Time-efficient measures of auditory frequency selectivity

References

• Bacon S.P. & Moore B.C.J. 1986. Temporal effects in masking and their influence on psychophysical tuning curves. J Acoust Soc Am, 80, 1638–1645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacon S.P. & Viemeister N.F. 1985. Simultaneous masking by gated and continuous sinusoidal maskers. J Acoust Soc Am, 78, 1220–1230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badri R., Siegel J.H. & Wright B.A. 2011. Auditory filter shapes and high-frequency hearing in adults who have impaired speech in noise performance despite clinically normal audiograms. J Acoust Soc Am, 129, 852–863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleveland W.S. 1979. Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J Am Stat Assoc, 74, 829–836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleveland W.S. 1994. The Elements of Graphing Data: Revisededition, Murray Hill, USA: AT&T Bell Laboratories.
   Google Scholar
• Florentine M., Buus S., Scharf B. & Zwicker E. 1980. Frequency selectivity in normally-hearing and hearing-impaired observers. J Speech Hear Res, 23, 646–669.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gaudrain E., Grimault N., Healy E.W. & Bera J.C. 2007. Effect of spectral smearing on the perceptual segregation of vowel sequences. Hear Res, 231, 32–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasberg B.R. & Moore B.C.J. 1986. Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments. J Acoust Soc Am, 79, 1020–1033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasberg B.R. & Moore B.C.J. 1990. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hear Res, 47, 103–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimault N. & Gaudrain E. 2006. The consequences of cochlear damage on auditory scene analysis. Curr Top Acoust Res, 4, 17–24.
   Google Scholar
• Haggard M.P., Lindblad A.C. & Foster J.R. 1986. Psychoacoustical and audiometric prediction of auditory disability for different frequency responses at listener-adjusted presentation levels. Audiology, 25, 277–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks M.L. & Bacon S.P. 1999. Psychophysical measures of auditory nonlinearities as a function of frequency in individuals with normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am, 105, 326–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby W.G. 2000. LOESS: A nonparametric, graphical tool for depicting relationships between variables. Elect Stud, 19, 577–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Davies D. & Patterson R.D. 1979. Psychophysical tuning curves: Restricting the listening band to the signal region. J Acoust Soc Am, 65, 765–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kishon-Rabin L., Segal O. & Algom D. 2009. Associations and dissociations between psychoacoustic abilities and speech perception in adolescents with severe-to-profound hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 52, 956–972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluk K. & Moore B.C.J. 2004. Factors affecting psychophysical tuning curves for normally-hearing subjects. Hear Res, 194, 118–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluk K. & Moore B.C.J. 2005. Factors affecting psychophysical tuning curves for hearing-impaired subjects with high-frequency dead regions. Hear Res, 200, 115–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluk K. & Moore B.C.J. 2006. Detecting dead regions using psychophysical tuning curves: A comparison of simultaneous and forward masking. Int J Audiol, 45, 463–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutman M.E., Gatehouse S. & Worthington A.G. 1991. Frequency resolution as a function of hearing threshold, level and age. J Acoust Soc Am, 89, 320–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutman M.E. & Wood E.J. 1985. A simple clinical measure of frequency resolution. Br J Audiol, 19, 1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malicka A.N., Munro K.J. & Baker R.J. 2009. Fast method for psychophysical tuning curve measurement in school-age children. Int J Audiol, 48, 546–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malicka A.N., Munro K.J. & Baker R.J. 2010. Diagnosing cochlear dead regions in children. Ear Hear, 31, 238–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markessis E., Poncelet L., Colin C., Coppens A., Hoonhorst I. et al. 2009. Frequency tuning curves derived from auditory steady state evoked potentials: A proof-of-concept study. Ear Hear, 30, 43–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. 1996. Perceptual consequences of cochlear hearing loss and their implications for the design of hearing aids. Ear Hear, 17, 133–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. 2001. Dead regions in the cochlea: Diagnosis, perceptual consequences, and implications for the fitting of hearing aids. Trends Amplif, 5, 1–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore, B.C.J. 2004. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing: 5th edition, London: Elsevier Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. 2007. Cochlear Hearing Loss: Physiological, Psychological and Technical Issues: 2nd edition, Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R. & Roberts B. 1984. Refining the measurement of psychophysical tuning curves. J Acoust Soc Am, 76, 1057–1066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Poon P.W., Bacon S.P. & Glasberg B. 1987. The temporal course of masking and the auditory filter shape. J Acoust Soc Am, 81, 1873–1880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Vickers D.A., Plack C.J. & Oxenham A.J. 1999. Inter-relationship between different psychoacoustic measures assumed to be related to the cochlear active mechanism. J Acoust Soc Am, 106, 2761–2778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakaichi T., Watanuki K. & Sakamoto S. 2003. A simplified measurement method of auditory filters for hearing-impaired listeners. Acoust Sci Technol, 24, 365–375.
   Google Scholar
• Oxenham A.J. & Shera C.A. 2003. Estimates of human cochlear tuning at low levels using forward and simultaneous masking. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 4, 541–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson J.D., Baer T. & Moore B.C.J. 2007. Using transposition to improve consonant discrimination and detection for listeners with severe high-frequency hearing loss. Int J Audiol, 46, 293–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sęk A., Alcantara J., Moore B.C.J., Kluk K. & Wicher A. 2005. Development of a fast method for determining psychophysical tuning curves. Int J Audiol, 44, 408–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sęk A. & Moore B.C.J. 2011. Implementation of a fast method for measuring psychophysical tuning curves. Int J Audiol, 50, 237–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sęk A., Wicher A. & Drgas S. 2007. A fast method for the determination of psychophysical tuning curves: Further refining. Arch Acoust, 32, 707–728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone M.A., Glasberg B.R. & Moore B.C.J. 1992. Simplified measurement of auditory filter shapes using the notched-noise method. Br J Audiol, 26, 329–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers V., Molis M.R., Musch H., Walden B.E., Surr R.K. et al. 2003. Identifying dead regions in the cochlea: Psychophysical tuning curves and tone detection in threshold-equalizing noise. Ear Hear, 24, 133–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temchin A.N., Rich N.C. & Ruggero M.A. 2008. Threshold tuning curves of chinchilla auditory-nerve fibers. I. Dependence on characteristic frequency and relation to the magnitudes of cochlear vibrations. J Neurophysiol, 100, 2889–2898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegel R.L. & Lane C.E. 1924. The auditory masking of one pure tone by another and its probable relation to the dynamics of the inner ear. Phys Rev, 23, 266–285.
   Google Scholar
• Wright B.A. & Dai H. 1994. Detection of unexpected tones in gated and continuous maskers. J Acoust Soc Am, 95, 939–948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwicker E. 1974. On a psychoacoustical equivalent of tunning curves. Zwicker & Terhardt (eds.) Facts and Models in Hearing, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 132–140.
   Google Scholar
• Zwicker E. & Schorn K. 1978. Psychoacoustical tuning curves in audiology. Audiology, 17, 120–140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar