Frequency selectivity of contralateral residual acoustic hearing in bimodal cochlear implant users, and limitations on the ability to match the pitch of electric and acoustic stimuli

References

• Baumann U. & Nobbe A. 2006. The cochlear implant electrode-pitch function. Hear Res, 213, 34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blamey P.J., Dooley G.J., Parisi E.S. & Clark G.M. 1996. Pitch comparisons of acoustically and electrically evoked auditory sensations. Hear Res, 99, 139–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boëx C., Baud L Cosendai G Sigrist A Kos M.I. . 2006. Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 7, 110–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown C.A. & Bacon S.P. 2009a. Achieving electric-acoustic benefit with a modulated tone. Ear Hear, 30, 489–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown C.A. & Bacon S.P. 2009b. Low-frequency speech cues and simulated electric-acoustic hearing. J Acoust Soc Am, 125, 1658–1665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlyon R.P., Lynch C. & Deeks J.M. 2010a. Effect of stimulus level and place of stimulation on temporal pitch perception by cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am, 127, 2997–3008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlyon R.P., Macherey O., Frijns J.H.M., Axon P.R., Kalkman, R.K. . 2010b. Pitch comparisons between electrical stimulation of a cochlear implant and acoustic stimuli presented to a normal-hearing contralateral ear. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 11, 625–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang J.E., Bai J.Y. & Zeng F.-G. 2006. Unintelligible low-frequency sound enhances simulated cochlear-implant speech recognition in noise. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 53, 2598–2601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching T.Y.C., Incerti P. & Hill M. 2004. Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears. Ear Hear, 25, 9–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching T.Y.C., van Wanrooy E. & Dillon H. 2007. Binaural-bimodal fitting or bilateral implantation for managing severe to profound deafness: A review. Trends Amplif, 11, 161–192.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cullington H.E. & Zeng F.-G. 2010. Bimodal hearing benefit for speech recognition with competing voice in cochlear implant subject with normal hearing in contralateral ear. Ear Hear, 31, 70–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorman M.F. & Ketten D. 2003. Adaptation by a cochlear-implant patient to upward shifts in the frequency representation of speech. Ear Hear, 24, 457–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorman M.F., Spahr T Gifford R Loiselle L McKarns S. . 2007. An electric frequency-to-place map for a cochlear implant patient with hearing in the nonimplanted ear. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 8, 234–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner A Ball V Rosen S Moore B.C.J. & Fourcin A. 1992. Speech pattern hearing-aids for the profoundly hearing-impaired: Speech-perception and auditory abilities. J Acoust Soc Am, 91, 2136–2155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner A. & Rosen S. 1999. Contributions of temporal encodings of voicing, voicelessness, fundamental frequency, and amplitude variation to audio-visual and auditory speech perception. J Acoust Soc Am, 106, 2063–2073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner A., Rosen S. & Moore B.C.J. 1990. Residual frequency selectivity in the profoundly hearing-impaired listener. Br J Audiol, 24, 381–392.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Firszt J.B., Reeder R.M. & Skinner M.W. 2008. Restoring hearing symmetry with two cochlear implants or one cochlear implant and a contralateral hearing aid. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 45, 749–767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick E.M., Seguin C., Schramm D., Chenier J. & Armstrong S. 2009. Users’ experience of a cochlear implant combined with a hearing aid. Int J Audiol, 48, 172–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu Q.-J. & Galvin J.J. 2003. The effects of short-term training for spectrally mismatched noise-band speech. J Acoust Soc Am, 113, 1065–1072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood D.D. 1990. A cochlear frequency-position function for several species: 29 years later. J Acoust Soc Am, 87, 2592–2605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketten D.R., Vannier M.W., Skinner M.W., Gates G.A., Wang G. . 1998. In vivo measures of cochlear length and insertion depth of nucleus cochlear implant electrode arrays. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 107, 1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong Y.Y. & Carlyon R.P. 2007. Improved speech recognition in noise in simulated binaurally combined acoustic and electric stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am, 121, 3717–3727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong Y.Y., Stickney G.S. & Zeng F.-G. 2005. Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am, 117, 1351–1361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laback B Pok S.M., Baumgartner W.D., Deutsch W.A. & Schmid K. 2004. Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors. Ear Hear, 25, 488–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman M.C. 1984. Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. I. Threshold shift and characteristic frequency shift. Hear Res, 16, 33–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luntz M Shpak T. & Weiss H. 2005. Binaural-bimodal hearing: Concomitant use of a unilateral cochlear implant and a contralateral hearing aid. Acta Otolaryngol, 125, 863–869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott H Sucher C. & Simpson A. 2009. Electro-acoustic stimulation acoustic and electric pitch comparisons. Audiol Neurootol, 14, 2–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mok MGrayden D Dowell R.C. & Lawrence D. 2006. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 49, 338–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiss L.A.J., Turner C.W., Erenberg S.R. & Gantz B.J. 2007. Changes in pitch with a cochlear implant over time. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 8, 241–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen S Faulkner A. & Wilkinson L. 1999. Adaptation by normal listeners to upward spectral shifts of speech: Implications for cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am, 106, 3629–3636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siciliano C.M., Faulkner A Rosen S. & Mair K. 2010. Resistance to learning binaurally mismatched frequency-to-place maps: Implications for bilateral stimulation with cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am, 127, 1645–1660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toner J McAnallen C Proops D Cooper H Raine C. . 2004. Criteria of candidacy for unilateral cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults. II: Cost-effectiveness analysis. Ear Hear, 25, 336–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeire K Nobbe A Schleich P Nopp P Voormolen M.H. . 2008. Neural tonotopy in cochlear implants: An evaluation in unilateral cochlear implant patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus. Hear Res, 245, 98–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang T Dorman M.F. & Spahr A.J. 2010. Information from the voice fundamental frequency (F0) region accounts for the majority of the benefit when acoustic stimulation is added to electric stimulation. Ear Hear, 31, 63–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar