Overall versus individual changes for otoacoustic emissions and audiometry in a noise-exposed cohort

References

• Altman D.G. 1995. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman & Hall, pp. 230–231.
   Google Scholar
• Attias J., Furst M., Furman V., Reshef I., Horowitz G. . 1995. Noise-induced otoacoustic emission loss with or without hearing loss, Ear Hear, 16, 612–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attias J. & Bresloff I. 1996. Noise induced temporary otoacoustic emission shifts. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol, 7, 221–233.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Attias J., Horovitz G., El-Hatib N. & Nageris, B. 2001. Detection and clinical diagnosis of noise-induced hearing loss by otoacoustic emissions. Noise Health, 3, 19–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Balatsouras D.G. 2004. The evaluation of noise-induced hearing loss with distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Med Sci Monit, 10, CR218–CR222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beattie R.C. & Bleech J. 2000. Effects of sample size on the reliability of noise floor and DPOAE. Br J Audiol, 34, 305–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beattie R.C., Kenworthy O.T. & Luna C.A. 2003. Immediate and short-term reliability of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Int J Audiol, 42, 348–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhagat S.P. & Davis A.M. 2008. Modification of otoacoustic emissions following ear-level exposure to MP3 player music. Int J Audiol, 47, 12, 751–760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies L. & Gather U. 1993. The identification of multiple outliers. J Am Stat Ass, 88, 782–792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai A., Reed D., Cheyne A., Richards S. & Prasher D. 1999. Absence of otoacoustic emissions in subjects with normal audiometric thresholds implies exposure to noise. Noise Health, 1, 58–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duvdevany A. & Furst M. 2007. The effect of longitudinal noise exposure on behavioral audiograms and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Int J Audiol, 46, 119–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckelbooth. http://www.eckeleurope.com/audiometric_booth.htm date last viewed 12/23/2010.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin D.J., McCoy M.J., Martin G.K. & Lonsbury-Martin B.L. 1992. Test/retest reliability of distortion-product and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions, Ear Hear, 13, 417–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorga M.P., Neely S.T., Jonhson T.A., Dierking D.M. & Garner C.A. 2007. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in relation to hearing loss. In: M.S. Robinette & T.J. Glattke (eds.), Otoacoustic Emissions, Clinical Applications. New York: Thieme, pp. 211–212.
   Google Scholar
• Hamdan A.L., Abouchacra K.S., Zeki AL Hazzouri A.G. & Zaytoun G. 2008. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds. Ear Hear, 29, 360–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helleman H.W., Jansen E.J. & Dreschler W.A. 2010. Otoacoustic emissions in a hearing conservation program: General applicability in longitudinal monitoring and the relation to changes in pure-tone thresholds. Int J Audiol, 49, 410–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Z.W., Luo Y., Wu Z., Tao Z., Jones R. . 2005. Paradoxical enhancement of active cochlear mechanics in long-term administration of salicylate. J Neurophysiol, 93, 2053–2061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization, 1989. ISO8253 - 1:1989. Acoustics: Audiometric test methods, Part 1: Basic pure-tone air and bone conduction threshold audiometry, Geneva: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• Job A., Raynal M., Kossowski M., Studler M., Ghernaouti C. . 2009. Otoacoustic detection of risk of early hearing loss in ears with normal audiograms: A three-year follow-up study. Hear Res, 251, 10–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakigi A., Hirakawa H., Harel N., Mount R.J. & Harrison R.V. 1998. Basal cochlear lesions result in increased amplitude of otoacoustic emissions, Audiol Neurootol, 3, 361–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keppler H., Dhooge I., Maes L., D'Haenens W., Bockstael A. . 2010. Transient-evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions: A short-term test-retest reliability study. Int J Audiol, 49, 99–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapsley Miller J.A., Marshall L. & Heller L.M. 2004. A longitudinal study of changes in evoked otoacoustic emissions and pure-tone thresholds as measured in a hearing conservation program. Int J Audiol, 43, 307–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapsley Miller J.A., Marshall L. Heller L.M. & Hughes L.M. 2006. Low-level otoacoustic emissions may predict susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am, 120, 280–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapsley Miller J.A. & Marshall L. 2007. Otoacoustic emissions as a preclinical measure of NIHL and susceptibility to NIHL. In: M.S. Robinette & T.J. Glattke (eds.), Otoacoustic Emissions, Clinical Applications. New York: Thieme, pp. 321–341.
   Google Scholar
• Lasky R.E., Snodgrass E. & Hecox K. 1994. Distortion-product otoacoustic emission input/output functions as a function of frequency in human adults. J Am Acad Audiol, 5, 183–194.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LePage E.L. & Murray N.M. 1998. Latent cochlear damage in personal stereo users: A study based on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Med J Aust, 169, 588–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall L., Lapsley Miller J.A., Heller L.M., Wolgemuth K.S., Hughes L.M. . 2009. Detecting incipient inner-ear damage from impulse noise with otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am, 125, 995–1013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mei L., Huang Z.W. & Tao Z.Z. 2009. Paradoxical long-term enhancement of distortion product otoacoustic emission amplitude after repeated exposure to moderate level, wide band noise in awake guinea pigs. J Laryngol Otol, 123, 1090–1096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng I.H.Y. & McPherson B. 2005. Test-retest reliability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the 1–7 kHz range. Audiol Med, 3, 108–115.
   Google Scholar
• Reuter K., Ordoñez R.P., De Toro M.A.A. & Hammershøi D. 2007. Artifact rejection of distortion product otoacoustic emissions measured after sound exposure. In: A.Calvo-Manzano, A. Pérez-López, J. Salvador Santiago (eds.) Proc. of 19th International Congress on Acoustics - ICA07:Acoustics of the 21st Century. Spanish Acoustical Society, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Roede J., Harris F.P. Probst R. & Xu L. 1993. Repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing humans. Audiology, 32, 273–281.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seixas N.S., Goldman B., Sheppard L., Neitzel R., Norton S. . 2005. Prospective noise induced changes to hearing among construction industry apprentices. Occup Environ Med, 62, 309–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shupak A., Tal D., Sharoni Z., Oren M., Ravid A. . 2007. Otoacoustic emissions in early noise-induced hearing loss. Otol Neurotol, 28, 745–752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sisto R., Chelotti S., Moriconi L., Pellegrini S., Citroni A. . 2007. Otoacoustic emission sensitivity to low levels of noise-induced hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am, 122, 387–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sockalingam R., Lee Choi J., Choi D. & Kei J. 2007. Test-retest reliability of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in children with normal hearing: A preliminary study. Int J Audiol, 46, 351–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart A., Passmore A.L., Culbertson D.S. & Jones S.M. 2009. Test-retest reliability of low-level evoked distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 52, 671–681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner W., Heppelmann G., Vonthein R. & Zenner H.P. 2008. Test-retest repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear, 29, 378–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir J.P. 2005. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res, 19, 231–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar