Ear and electrode effects reduce within-group variability in middle latency response amplitude measures

References

• American Academy of Audiology (2010). Clinical practice guidelines – diagnosis, treatment, and management of children and adults with central auditory processing disorder.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson S. & Kraus N. 2010. Objective neural indices of speech-in-noise perception. Trends Amplif, 14, 73–83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arehole S., Augustine L. & Simhadri R. 1995. Middle latency response in children with learning disabilities: Preliminary findings. J Commun Disord, 28, 21–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Speech Language Hearing Association (2005). (Central) auditory processing disorders: Working group on auditory processing disorders.
   Google Scholar
• Barajas J., Exposito M., Fernandez R. & Martin L. 1988. Middle latency response to a 500-Hz tone pip in normal-hearing and in hearing-impaired subjects. Scand Audiol, 17, 21–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baran J., Bothfeldt R. & Musiek F. 2004. Central auditory deficits associated with compromise of the primary auditory cortex. J Am Acad Audiol, 15, 106–116.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beattie R., Moretti M. & Warren V. 1984. Effects of rise-fall time, frequency, and intensity on the early/middle evoked response. J Speech Hear Disord, 49, 114–127.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bell S., Allen R. & Lutman M. 2001. The feasibility of maximum length sequences to reduce acquisition time of the middle latency response. J Acoust Soc Am, 109, 1073–1081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billiet C. & Bellis T. 2011. The relationship between brainstem temporal processing and performance on tests of central auditory function in children with reading disorders. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 54, 228–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacace A., Satya-Murti S. & Wolpaw J. 1990. Human middle-latency auditory evoked potentials: Vertex and temporal components. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 77, 6–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cottrell G. & Gans D. 1995. Auditory-evoked response morphology in profoundly-involved multi-handicapped children: Comparisons with normal infants and children. Audiology, 34, 189–206.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Counsell S.J., Maalouf E.F., Fletcher A.M., Duggan P., Battin M. 2002. MR imaging assessment of myelination in the very preterm brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 23, 872–881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalebout S. & Robey R. 1997. Comparison of the intersubject and intrasubject variability of exogenous and endogenous auditory evoked potentials. J Am Acad Audiol, 8, 342–354.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Filippini R. & Schochat E. 2009. Brainstem evoked auditory potentials with speech stimulus in the auditory processing disorder. Braz J Otorhinolarngol, 75, 449–455.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fischer C., Bognar L., Turjman F., Villanyi E. & Lapras C. 1994. Auditory early- and middle-latency evoked potentials in patients with quadrigeminal plate tumors. Neurosurgery, 35, 45–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geisler C., Frishkopf L. & Rosenblith W. 1958. Extracranial responses to acoustic clicks in man. Science, 128, 1210–1211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood L. 1990. Update on frequency specificity of AEP measurements. J Am Acad Audiol, 1, 125–129.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Howell D. 1997. Statistical Methods for Psychology (4th ed.). Belmont, USA: Duxbury.
   Google Scholar
• Jerger J. & Musiek F. 2000. Report of the consensus conference on the diagnosis of auditory processing disorders in school-aged children. J Am Acad Audiol, 11, 467–474.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaseda Y., Tobimatsu S., Morioka T. & Kato M. 1991. Auditory middle-latency responses in patients with localized and non-localized lesions of the central nervous system. J Neurol, 238, 427–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanagh K., Harker L. & Tyler R. 1984. Auditory brainstem and middle latency responses. I. Effect of response filtering and waveform identification. II. Threshold responses to a 500-Hz tone pip. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl, 108, 1–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kavanagh K., Domico W., Crews P. & McCormick V. 1988. Comparison of the intrasubject repeatability of auditory brain stem and middle latency responses elicited in young children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 97, 264–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kileny P., Paccioretti D. & Wilson A. 1987. Effects of cortical lesions on middle-latency auditory-evoked responses (MLR). Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 66, 108–120.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kraus N. & McGee T. 1988. Color imaging of the human middle latency response. Ear Hear, 9, 159–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus N. & McGee T. 1995. The middle latency response generating system. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 44, 93–101.
   Google Scholar
• Kraus N., McGee T. & Comeratore C. 1989. MLRs in children are consistently present during wakefulness, stage 1, and REM sleep. Ear Hear, 10, 339–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus N., McGee T., Littman T. & Nicol T. 1992. Reticular formation influences on primary and non-primary auditory pathways as reflected by the middle latency response. Brain Res, 587, 186–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus N., Ozdamar O., Hier D. & Stein L. 1982. Auditory middle latency responses (MLRs) in patients with cortical lesions. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 54, 275–287.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lauter J. & Karzon R. 1990. Individual differences in auditory electric responses: Comparisons of between-subject and within-subject variability. IV. Latency-variability comparisons in early, middle, and late responses. Scand Audiol, 19, 175–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauter J. & Karzon R. 1990. Individual differences in auditory electric responses: Comparisons of between-subject and within-subject variability. V. Amplitude-variability comparisons in early, middle, and late responses. Scand Audiol, 19, 175–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lembreghts M., Crasson M., el Ahmadi A. & Timsit-Berthier M. 1995. Interindividual variability of exogenous and endogenous auditory evoked potentials in a condition of voluntary attention. Neurophysiol Clin, 25, 203–223.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McFarland D. & Cacace A. 2004. Separating stimulus-locked and unlocked components of the auditory event-related potential. Hear Res, 193, 111–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarland W., Vivion M. & Goldstein R. 1977. Middle components of the AER to tone-pips in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. J Speech Hear Res, 20, 781–798.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McGee T., Kraus N., Littman T. & Nicol T. 1992. Contributions of medial geniculate body subdivisions to the middle latency response. Hear Res, 61, 147–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore J. & Guan Y. 2001. Cytoarchitectural and axonal maturation in human auditory cortex. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 2, 297–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore J. 2002. Maturation of human auditory cortex: Implications for speech perception. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl, 189, 7–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Musiek F. 1983. Assessment of central auditory dysfunction: The dichotic digit test revisited. Ear Hear, 4, 79–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiek F. & Baran J. 2007. The Auditory System: Anatomy, Physiology, and Clinical Correlates. New York: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Musiek F. & Geurkink N. 1981. Auditory brainstem and middle latency evoked response sensitivity near threshold. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 90, 236–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiek F. & Lee W.W. 1997. Conventional and maximum length sequences middle latency response in patients with central nervous system lesions. J Am Acad Audiol, 8, 173–180.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Musiek F., Geurkink N., Weider D. & Donnelly K. 1984. Past, present, and future applications of the auditory middle latency response. Laryngoscope, 94, 1545–1553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiek F., Charette L., Kelly T., Lee W. & Musiek E. 1999. Hit and false positive rates for the middle latency response in patients with central nervous system involvement. J Am Acad Audiol, 10, 124–132.
   Google Scholar
• Musiek F., Bellis T. & Chermak G. 2005. Nonmodularity of the central auditory nervous system: Implications for (central) auditory processing disorder. Am J Audiol, 14, 143–150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Naatanen R. & Teder W. 1991. Attention effects on the event-related potential. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl, 491, 161–166.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nagle S. & Musiek F. 2009. Morphological changes in the middle latency response using maximum length sequence stimuli. J Am Acad Audiol, 20, 492–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozdamar O., Kraus N. & Curry F. 1982. Auditory brainstem and middle-latency responses in a patient with cortical deafness. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 53, 224–230.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paus T., Zijdenbos A., Worsley K., Collins D., Blumenthal J. 1999. Structural maturation of neural pathways in children and adolescents: In vivo study. Science, 283, 1908–1911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrin J.S., Leonard G., Perron M., Pike G.B., Pitiot A. . Sex differences in the growth of white matter during adolescence. Neuroimage, 45, 1055–1066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitman E.J.G.. 1939. A note on normal correlation. Biometrika, 31, 9–12.
   Google Scholar
• Ponton C., Eggermont J.J., Khosla D., Kwong B. & Don M. 2002. Maturation of human central auditory system activity: Separating auditory evoked potentials by dipole source modeling. Clin Neurophysiol, 113, 407–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdy S., Kelly A. & Davies M. 2002. Auditory brainstem response, middle latency response, and late cortical-evoked potentials in children with learning disabilities. J Am Acad Audiol, 13, 367–382.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pynchon K., Tucker D., Ruth, R., Barrett K. & Herr D. 1998. Area-under-the-curve measure of the auditory middle latency response (AMLR) from birth to early adulthood. Am J Audiol, 7, 45–49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sano M., Kuan C.C., Kaga K., Itoh K., Ino K. . 2008. Early myelination patterns in the central auditory pathway of the higher brain: MRI evaluation study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 72, 1479–1486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schochat E. & Musiek F. 2006. Maturation of outcomes of behavioral and electrophysiologic tests of central auditory function. J Commun Disord, 39, 78–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shehata-Dieler W., Shimizu H., Soliman S. & Tusa R. 1991. Middle latency auditory-evoked potentials in temporal lobe disorders. Ear Hear, 12, 377–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su P., Kuan C.C., Kaga K., Sano M. & Mima K. 2008. Myelination progression in language-correlated regions in brain of normal children determined by quantitative MRI assessment. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolarngol, 72, 1751–1763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weihing J. & Musiek F. 2008. An electrophysiological measure of binaural hearing in noise. J Am Acad Audiol, 19, 481–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods D., Alain C., Covarrubias D. & Zaidel O. 1995. Middle latency auditory-evoked potentials to tones of different frequency. Hear Res, 85, 69–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakovlev P. & Lecours A. 1967. In: A. Minkowski (ed.), Regional Development of the Brain in Early Life. Boston: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
   Google Scholar