Comparison of auditory temporal resolution between monolingual Persian and bilingual Turkish-Persian individuals

References

• American National Standards Institute. 1996. Specification for Audiometers (ANSI S3.6). New York: American National Standards Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Arlotto A. 1981. Introduction to Historical Linguistics: Second Edition. New York: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Brandlow A. & Bent T. 2002. The clear speech effect for non-native listeners. J Acoustic Soc Am, 112, 272–284.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carlo M.A. 2008. Effects of Bilingualism on Speech Recognition Performance in Noise. Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders. South Florida, USA: Arts and Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Carmichael M.E., Hall S.E. & Phillips D.P. 2008. Ear and contralateral masker effects on auditory temporal gap detection thresholds. Hear Res, 245, 18–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke M., Garcia Lecumberri M. & Barker L. 2008. The foreign language cocktail party problem: Energetic and informational masking effects in non-native speech perception. J Acoust Soc Am, 123, 414–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crandell C.C. & Smaldino J.J. 1996. Speech perception in noise by children for whom English is a second language. Am J Audiol, 5, 47–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cutler A., Garcia Lecumberri M. & Cooki, M. 2008. Constant identification in noise by native and non-native listeners: Effects of local context. J Acoustic Soc Am, 124, 1264–1268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler A., Weber A., Smits R. & Cooper, N. 2004. Pattern of English phoneme confusions by native and non-native listeners. J Acoustic Soc Am, 116, 3668–3678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flege J.E., Mackay I.R.A. & Meador D. 1999. Native Italian speakers’ perception and production of English vowels. J Acoustic Soc Am, 106, 2973–2987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia Lecumberri M. & Cooke M. 2006. Effect of masker type on native and non-native consonant perception in noise. J Acoustic Soc Am, 119, 2445–2454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gat I.B. & Keith R.W. 1978. An effect of linguistic experience: Auditory word discrimination by native and non-native speakers of English. Audiology, 17, 339–345.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Golestani N., Rosen S. & Scott S.K. 2009. Native-language benefit for understanding speech in noise: The contribution of semantics. Cambridge, UK: Biling, 12, 385–392.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guion S.G., Flege J.E., Akahane-Yamada R. & Pruitt J.C. 2000. An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: The case of Japanese adults’ perception of English consonants. J Acoustic Soc Am, 107, 2711–2724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harley T. 2001. The Psychology of Language from Data to Theory: Second Edition. Hove and New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kang J. 1998. Comparison of speech intelligbility between English and Chinese. J Acoustic Soc Am, 103, 1213–1216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd G. Jr., Mason C.R., Deliwala P.S., Woods W.S. & Colburn H.S. 1994. Reducing informational masking by sound segregation. J Acoustic Soc Am, 95, 3475–3480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korami-Nouri R., Shojaei R.S., Moniri S., Gholami A.R., Moradi A.R. . 2008. The effect of childhood bilingualism on episodic and semantic memory tasks. Scand J Psychol, 49, 93–109.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lew H. & Jerger J. 1991. Effect of linguistic interference on sentence identification. Ear Hear, 12, 365–367.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lopez S.M., Martin F.N. & Thibodeau L.M. 1997. Performance of monolingual and bilingual speakers of English and Spanish on the Synthetic Sentence Identification Test. Am J Audiol, 6, 33–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mayo L.H., Florentine M. & Buus S. 1997. Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 40, 686–693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meader D., Flege J. & Mackay I. 2000. Factors affecting the recognition of words in a second language. Biling Lang Cogn, 3, 55–67.
   Google Scholar
• Mosleh M. 2001. Development and evaluation of a speech recognition test for Persian speaking adults. Iranian J Audiol, 15 & 16, 72–76.
   Google Scholar
• Nabelek A.K. & Donahue A.M. 1984. Perception of consonants in reverberation by native and non-native listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 75, 632–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson P., Kohnert K., Sabour S. & Shaw D. 2005. Classroom noise and children hearing through a second language: Double jeopardy? Lang Speech Hear Ser, 36, 219–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson J.A. 1998. Refinement of the leaky-integrator model for temporal auditory processing utilizing sinusoidal and rectangular-pulse modulation functions. University of Iowa.
   Google Scholar
• Oldfield R.C. 1971. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips D.P., Rappaport J.M., Gulliver J.M. 1994. Impaired word recognition in noise by patients with noise-induced cochlear hearing loss: Contribution of temporal resolution defect. Otol Neurotol, 15, 679–686.
   Google Scholar
• Rasouli S. & Nozohouri R. 2012. Pre-school education and bilinguality of home and school in bilingual regions of Iran. Procedia Soc Behav Sci, 32, 308–313.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers C.L., Lister J.J., Febo D.M., Besing J.M. & Abrams H.B. 2006. Effects of bilingualism, noise, and reverberation on speech perception by listeners with normal hearing. Appl Psycholinguist, 27, 465–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sbinn J.B. 2007. Temporal processing and temporal patterning tests. In: Musiek, Chermak (eds.). Handbook of Central Auditory Processing Disorder. San Diego: Plural Publishing, pp. 231–256.
   Google Scholar
• Shanks J. & Shohet J. 2009. Tympanometry in clinical practice. In: Katz, Medwetsky, Burkard, Hood, (eds.), Handbook of Clinical Audiology (6th ed.). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Shi L.F. & Sanchez D. 2010. Spanish/ English bilingual listeners on clinical word recognition test: What to expect and how to predict. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 53, 1096–1110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi L.F. 2009. Normal-hearing English-as-a-second-language listeners’ recognition of English words in competing signals. Int J Audiol, 48, 260–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimizu T., Makishima K., Yoshida M. & Yamagishi H. 2002. Effect of background noise on perception of English speech for Japanese listeners. Auris Nasus Larynx, 29, 121–125.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schlauch R.S. & Nelson P. 2009. Pure-tone evaluation. In: Katz, Medwetsky, Burkard, Hood (eds.), Handbook of Clinical Audiology (6th ed.). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, p.38.
   Google Scholar
• Studebaker G. 1985. A ʽrationalized’ arcsine transform. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 28, 455–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart A. 2004. An investigation of list equivalency of the Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 in interrupted broadband noise. Am J Audiol, 13, 23–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stuart A. 2005. Development of auditory temporal resolution in school-age children revealed by word recognition in continuous and interrupted noise. Ear Hear, 26, 78–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart A. 2008. Reception thresholds for sentences in quiet, continuous noise, and interrupted noise in school-age children. J Am Acad Audiol, 19, 135–146.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stuart A., Givens G.D., Walker L.J. & Elangovan S. 2006. Auditory temporal resolution in normal-hearing preschool children revealed by word recognition in continuous and interrupted noise. J Am Acad Audiol, 119, 1946–1949.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart A. & Phillips D.P. 1996. Word recognition in continuous and interrupted broadband noise by young normal-hearing, older normal-hearing, and presbycusic listeners. Ear Hear, 17, 478–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart A. & Phillips D.P. 1997. Word recognition in continuous noise, interrupted noise, and in quiet by normal-hearing listeners at two sensation levels. Scand Audiol, 26, 112–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart A. & Phillips D.P. 1998. Deficits in auditory temporal resolution revealed by a comparison of word recognition under interrupted and continuous noise masking. Semin Hear, 19, 333–344.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart A., Zhang J. & Swink S. 2010. Reception thresholds for sentences in quiet and noise for monolingual English and bilingual Mandarin-English listeners. J Am Acad Audiol, 21, 239–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takata Y. & Nabelek A.K. 1990. English consonant recognition in noise and in reverberation by Japanese and American listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 88, 663–666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Engen K.J. 2010. Similarity and familiarity: Second language sentence recognition in first- and second-language multi-talker babble,Speech Commun, 52, 943–953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wijngaarden S., Steeneken H. & Houtgast T. 2002. Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native listeners. J Acoustic Soc Am, 111, 1906–1916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Hapsburg D. & Bahng J. 2006. Acceptance of background noise levels in bilingual (Korean-English) listeners. J Am Acad Audiol, 17, 649–658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Hapsburg D., Champlin C.A. & Shetty S.R. 2004. Reception thresholds for sentences in bilingual (Spanish/English) and monolingual (English) listeners. J Am Acad Audiol, 15, 88–98.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Von Hapsburg D. & Pena E.D. 2002. Understanding bilingualism and its impact on speech audiometry. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 45, 202–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss D. & Dempsey J.J. 2008. Performance of bilingual speakers on the English and Spanish versions of the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT). J Am Acad Audiol, 19, 5–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J., Stuart A. & Swink S. 2011. Word recognition in continuous and interrupted noise by monolingual and bilingual speakers. Can J Speech Lan Pathol Audiol, 35, 322–331.
   Google Scholar