The applicability of a speech-in-noise screening test in occupational hearing conservation

References

• Albrecht J., Elewout L.v., Verhage L. & Verweij C. 2005. Oorcheck: de validering van een interactief screeningsinstrument. Internal report LUMC, Leiden.
   Google Scholar
• Arbouw. 2012. Bedrijfstakatlas 2012. Harderwijk: Stichting Arbouw.
   Google Scholar
• Arbouw. 1998. Arbouw-advies Lawaai in de bouw. Harderwijk: Stichting Arbouw.
   Google Scholar
• Deming W.E. 1964. Statistical Adjustment of Data. 2nd edition. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Dobie R.A. 1983. Reliability and validity of industrial audiometry: Implications for hearing conservation program design. Laryngoscope, 93, 906–927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grobbee D.E. & Hoes A.W. 2009. Diagnostic research. Clinical Epidemiology: Principles, Methods, and Applications for Clinical Research. Sudbury: Jones & Bartlett Learning, pp. 58–102.
   Google Scholar
• Helleman H.W. & Dreschler W.A. 2012. Overall versus individual changes for otoacoustic emissions and audiometry in a noise-exposed cohort. Int J Audiol, 51, 362–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong O. 2005. Hearing loss among operating engineers in American construction industry. Int Arch Occup Environ Health, 78, 565–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen S., Luts H., Wagener K.C., Frachet B. & Wouters J. 2010. The French digit triplet test: A hearing screening tool for speech intelligibility in noise. Int J Audiol, 49, 378–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leensen M.C.J., de Laat J.A.P.M. & Dreschler W.A. 2011a. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, Part 1: Test evaluation for noise-induced hearing loss identification. Int J Audiol, 50, 823–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leensen M.C.J., de Laat J.A.P.M., Snik, A.F.M. & Dreschler W.A. 2011b. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, Part 2: Improving test sensitivity for noise-induced hearing loss. Int J Audiol, 50, 835–848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leensen M.C.J., van Duivenbooden J.C. & Dreschler W.A. 2011c. A retrospective analysis of noise-induced hearing loss in the Dutch construction industry. Int Arch Occup Environ Health, 84, 577–590
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leensen M.C.J. & Dreschler W.A. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, Part 3: Test sensitivity for uncontrolled parameters in domestic usage. Int J Audiol, under review.
   Google Scholar
• Lusk S.L., Kerr M.J. & Kauffman S.A. 1998. Use of hearing protection and perceptions of noise exposure and hearing loss among construction workers. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J, 59, 466–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer-Bisch C. 1996. Epidemiological evaluation of hearing damage related to strongly amplified music (personal cassette players, discotheques, rock concerts): High-definition audiometric survey on 1364 subjects. Audiology, 35, 121–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neitzel R. & Seixas N. 2005. The effectiveness of hearing protection among construction workers. J Occup Environ Hyg, 2, 227–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp R. & Mimpen A.M. 1979. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology, 18, 43–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• R Development Core Team. 2008. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL: http://www.R-project.org.
   Google Scholar
• Rhebergen K.R., Versfeld N.J. & Dreschler W.A. 2008. Learning effect observed for the speech reception threshold in interrupted noise with normal hearing listeners. Int J Audiol, 47,185–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rösler G. 1994. Progression of hearing loss caused by occupational noise. Scand Audiol, 23, 13–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah S., Gopal B., Reis J. & Novak M. 2009. Hear today, gone tomorrow: An assessment of portable entertainment player use and hearing acuity in a community sample. J Am Board Fam Med, 22, 17–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits C., Kapteyn T.S. & Houtgast T. 2004. Development and validation of an automatic speech-in-noise screening test by telephone. Int J Audiol, 43, 15–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits C., Merkus P. & Houtgast T. 2006. How we do it: The Dutch functional hearing-screening tests by telephone and internet. Clin Otolaryngol, 31, 436–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smoorenburg G.F. 1992. Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram. J Acoust Soc Am, 91, 421–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenfelt S., Janssen T., Schirkonyer V. & Grandori F. 2011. E-health technologies for adult hearing screening. Audiology Research, 1, 55–57.
   Google Scholar
• Tak S. & Calvert G. 2008. Hearing difficulty attributable to employment by industry and occupation: an analysis of the National Health Interview Survey – United States, 1997 to 2003. J Occup Environ Med, 50, 46–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Molen H., van der Laan G., Lenderink A. & Spreeuwers D. 2010. Beroepsziekten in cijfers 2010. Amsterdam, Nederlands Centrum voor Beroepsziekten, Coronel Instituut voor Arbeid en Gezondheid, AMC, UvA.
   Google Scholar
• van der Molen H., van der Laan G., Lenderink A. & Spreeuwers D. 2011. Beroepsziekten in cijfers 2011. Amsterdam , Nederlands Centrum voor Beroepsziekten, Coronel Instituut voor Arbeid en Gezondheid, AMC, UvA.
   Google Scholar
• van Son N. & Jellema I.J. 2011. Analyse van de hoortesten van de Nationale Hoorstichting 2010. Intern rapport Nationale Hoorstichting, Leiden.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel I., Brug J., van der Ploeg C.P. & Raat H. 2009. Strategies for the prevention of MP3-induced hearing loss among adolescents: Expert opinions from a Delphi study. Pediatrics, 123, 1257–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir J.P. 2005. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res, 19, 231–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar D., Cohen A. & Azar N. 1980. Promoting increased use of ear protection in noise through information feedback. Hum Factors, 22, 69–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar