265
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Reliability of categorical loudness scaling in the electrical domain

, , &
Pages 409-417 | Received 18 Oct 2013, Accepted 23 Dec 2013, Published online: 10 Apr 2014

References

  • Al-Salim S.C., Kopun J.G., Neely S.T., Jesteadt W., Stiegemann B. et al. 2010. Reliability of categorical loudness scaling and its relation to threshold. Ear Hear, 31, 567–578.
  • Blamey P.J., Dooley G.J., James C.J. et al. 2000. Monaural and binaural loudness measures in CI with contralateral residual hearing. Ear Hear, 21, 6–17.
  • Brand T. & Hohmann V. 2001. Effect of hearing loss, center frequency, and bandwidth on the shape of loudness functions in categorical loudness scaling. Int J Audiol, 40, 92–103.
  • Brand T. & Hohmann V. 2002. An adaptive procedure for categorical loudness scaling. J Acoust Soc Am, 112, 1597–1604.
  • Chatterjee M. 1999. Effects of stimulation mode on threshold and loudness growth in multielectrode cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am, 105, 850–860.
  • Chatterjee M., Fu Q.J. & Shannon R.V. 2000. Effects of phase duration and electrode separation on loudness growth in cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 107, 1637–1644.
  • Chua T.E.H., Bachman M. & Zeng F. 2011. Intensity coding in electric hearing effect of electrode configuration and stimulation waveforms. Ear Hear, 32, 1–11.
  • Cohen L.T. 2009. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 1. Growth of loudness and ECAP amplitude with current. Hear Res, 247, 87–99.
  • Cox R.M., Alexander G.C., Taylor I.M. & Gray G.A. 1997. The contour test of loudness perception. Ear Hear, 18, 388–400.
  • Fu Q.J. 2005. Loudness growth in cochlear implants: effect of stimulation rate and electrode configuration. Hear Res, 202, 55–62.
  • Fu Q.J. & Shannon R.V. 1998. Effects of amplitude nonlinearity on phoneme recognition by cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 104, 2570–2577.
  • Gallégo S., Garnier S., Micheyl C. et al. 1999. Loudness growth functions and EABR characteristics in Digisonic cochlear implantees. Acta Otolaryngolog, 119, 234–238.
  • Hoth S. 2006. Indication for the need of flexible and frequency specific mapping functions in cochlear implant speech processors. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 264, 129–138.
  • Humes L.E., Pavlovic C., Bray V. & Barr M. 1996. Real-ear measurement of hearing threshold and loudness. Trends Amp, 1:121–35.
  • ISO/IEC 16832:2006: Acoustics – Loudness scaling by means of categories. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
  • Keidser G., Seymour J., Dillon H., Grant F. & Byrne D. 1998. An efficient, adaptive method of measuring loudness growth functions. Scand Audiol, 28, 3–14.
  • Kinkel M. 2007. The new ISO 16832 “Acoustics – Loudness scaling by means of categories.” 8th EFAS Congress/10th Congress of the German Society of Audiology, Heidelburg.
  • Marozeau J. & Florentine M. 2007. Loudness growth in individual listeners with hearing losses: A review. J Acoust Soc Am, 122, EL81.
  • McKay C.M., Henshall K.R., Farrell R.J. et al. 2003. A practical method of predicting the loudness of complex electrical stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am, 113, 2054–2063.
  • Potts L.G., Skinner M.W., Gotter B.D., Strube M.J. & Brenner C.A. 2007. Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T-and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients. Ear Hear, 28, 495–511.
  • Punch J., Joseph A. & Rakerd B. 2004. Most comfortable and uncomfortable loudness levels: Six decades of research. Am J Audiol, 13, 144–157.
  • Rasmussen A.N., Olsen S.O., Borgkvist B.V. & Nielsen L.H. 1998. Long-term test-retest reliability of category loudness scaling in normal- hearing subjects using pure-tone stimuli. Scand Audiol, 27, 161–167.
  • Robinson K. & Gatehouse S. 1996. Test-retest reliability of loudness scaling. Ear Hear, 17, 120–123.
  • Sanpetrino N.M. & Smith R.L. 2006. The Growth of Loudness Functions Measured in Cochlear Implant Listeners Using Absolute Magnitude Estimation and Compared Using Akaike's Information Criterion. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 1, 1642–1644.
  • Shannon R.V. 1985. Threshold and loudness functions for pulsatile stimulation of cochlear implants. Hear Res, 18, 35–143.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.