Will diminishing cochlear delay affect speech perception in noise?

References

• Cowan N., Leavitt L.A., Massaro D.W. & Kent R.D. 1982. A fluent backward talker. J Speech Hear Res, 25, 48–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dau T., Wegner O., Mellert V. & Kollmeier B. 2000. Auditory brainstem responses with optimized chirp signals compensating basilar-membrane dispersion. J Acoust Soc Am, 107, 1530–1540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer E. 1980. Auditory physics: Physical principles in hearing theory I. Phys Rep, 62, 87–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWeese M.R., Wehr M. & Zador A.M. 2003. Binary spiking in auditory cortex. J Neurosci, 23, 7940–7949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Don M., Kwong B., Tanaka C., Brackmann D. & Nelson R. 2005. The stacked ABR: A sensitive and specific screening tool for detecting small acoustic tumors. Audiol Neurootol, 10, 274–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Don M., Masuda A., Nelson R. & Brackmann D. 1997. Successful detection of small acoustic tumors using the stacked derived-band auditory brainstem response amplitude. Am J Otol, 18, 608–621; discussion 682–685.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Don M., Ponton C.W., Eggermont J.J. & Masuda A. 1994. Auditory brainstem response (ABR) peak amplitude variability reflects individual differences in cochlear response times. J Acoust Soc Am, 96, 3476–3491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durrant J.D. & Feth L.L. 2013. Hearing Sciences: A Foundational Approach. Boston, USA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Elberling C., Don M., Cebulla M. & Sturzebecher E. 2007. Auditory steady-state responses to chirp stimuli based on cochlear traveling wave delay. J Acoust Soc Am, 122, 2772–2785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fobel O. & Dau T. 2004. Searching for the optimal stimulus eliciting auditory brainstem responses in humans. J Acoust Soc Am, 116, 2213–2222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furukawa S., Xu L. & Middlebrooks J.C. 2000. Coding of sound-source location by ensembles of cortical neurons. J Neurosci, 20, 1216–1228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazan V. & Simpson A. 1998. The effect of cue-enhancement on the intelligibility of nonsense word and sentence materials presented in noise. Speech Commun, 24, 211–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heil P. & Irvine D.R. 1997. First-spike timing of auditory-nerve fibers and comparison with auditory cortex. J Neurophysiol, 78, 2438–2454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayser C., Logothetis N.K. & Panzeri S. 2010. Millisecond encoding precision of auditory cortex neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 107, 16976–16981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiang N.Y. 1975. Stimulus representation in the discharge patterns of auditory neurons. In: E.L. Eagles (ed.) Human Communication and Its Disorders. New York: Raven Press, pp. 81–96.
   Google Scholar
• Kimura D. & Folb S. 1968. Neural processing of backwards-speech sounds. Science, 161, 395–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Londei A., D”Ausilio A., Basso D., Sestieri C., Gratta C.D. et al. 2010. Sensory-motor brain network connectivity for speech comprehension. Hum Brain Mapp, 31, 567–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackersie C., Neuman A.C. & Levitt H. 1999. Response time and word recognition using a Modified-Rhyme monitoring task: List equivalency and time-order effects. Ear Hear, 20, 515–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely S.T., Norton S.J., Gorga M.P. & Jesteadt W. 1988. Latency of auditory brainstem responses and otoacoustic emissions using tone-burst stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am, 83, 652–656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niederjohn R.J. & Grotelueschen J. 1976. The enhancement of speech intelligibility in high noise levels by high-pass filtering followed by rapid amplitude compression. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 24, 277–282.
   Google Scholar
• Petoe M.A., Bradley A.P. & Wilson W.J. 2010. On chirp stimuli and neural synchrony in the suprathreshold auditory brainstem response. J Acoust Soc Am, 128, 235–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasetshwane D.M., Boston J.R., Durrant J.D., Yoo S.D., Li C.C. et al. 2011. Speech enhancement by combination of transient emphasis and noise cancelation. Digital Signal Processing Workshop and IEEE Signal Processing Education Workshop (DSP/SPE), 2011 IEEE, pp. 116–121.
   Google Scholar
• Rasetshwane D.M., Boston J.R., Li C.C. & Durrant J.D. 2007. Effects of pre-processing filters on a wavelet packet-based algorithm to identify speech transients. Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics, 2007 IEEE Workshop, pp. 179–182.
   Google Scholar
• Rasetshwane D.M., Boston J.R., Li C.C., Durrant J.D. & Genna G. 2009. Enhancement of speech intelligibility using transients extracted by wavelet packets. Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics, 2009. WASPAA “09. IEEE Workshop, pp. 173–176.
   Google Scholar
• Riedel H. & Kollmeier B. 2002. Comparison of binaural auditory brainstem responses and the binaural difference potential evoked by chirps and clicks. Hear Res, 169, 85–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggero M.A. & Temchin A.N. 2007. Similarity of traveling-wave delays in the hearing organs of humans and other tetrapods. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 8, 153–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shera C.A. & Guinan J.J. 2000. Frequency dependence of stimulus- frequency-emission phase: Implications for cochlear mechanics. In: H. Wada, T. Takasaka, K. Ikeda, K. Ohyama & T. Koike (eds.) Proceedings of the International Symposium on Recent Developments in Auditory Mechanics. Singapore: World Scientific, pp. 381–387.
   Google Scholar
• Skowronski M.D. & Harris J.G. 2006. Applied principles of clear and Lombard speech for automated intelligibility enhancement in noisy environments. Speech Commun, 48, 549–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft D.A., Grayden D.B. & Burkitt A.N. 2010. Across-frequency delays based on the cochlear traveling wave: Enhanced speech presentation for cochlear implants. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 57, 596–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tantibundhit C., Boston J.R., Ching Chung L. & El-Jaroudi A. 2005. Automatic speech decomposition and speech coding using MDCT-based hidden Markov chain and wavelet-based hidden Markov tree models. Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics, 2005. IEEE Workshop, pp. 207–210.
   Google Scholar
• Uppenkamp S., Fobel S. & Patterson R.D. 2001. The effects of temporal asymmetry on the detection and perception of short chirps. Hear Res, 158, 71–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojtczak M., Beim J.A., Micheyl C. & Oxenham A.J. 2012a. Perception of across-frequency asynchrony and the role of cochlear delays. J Acoust Soc Am, 131, 363–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojtczak M., Rai S., Beim J.A. & Oxenham A.J. 2012b. The effect of spectral asynchrony on speech recognition in demanding listening conditions. J Acoust Soc Am, 131, 3515.
   Google Scholar
• Wojtczak M., Beim J.A., Micheyl C. & Oxenham A.J. 2013a. Effects of temporal stimulus properties on the perception of across-frequency asynchrony. J Acoust Soc Am, 133, 982–997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojtczak M., Beim J.A., Micheyl C. & Oxenham A.J. 2013b. Perception of across-frequency asynchrony by listeners with cochlear hearing loss. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 14, 573–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y., DeWeese M.R., Otazu G.H. & Zador A.M. 2008. Millisecond-scale differences in neural activity in auditory cortex can drive decisions. Nat Neurosci, 11, 1262–1263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo S.D., Boston J.R., El-Jaroudi A., Li C.C., Durrant J.D. et al. 2007. Speech signal modification to increase intelligibility in noisy environments. J Acoust Soc Am, 122, 1138–1149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar