Increasing motivation changes subjective reports of listening effort and choice of coping strategy

References

• Backs R.W. & Seljos K.A. 1994. Metabolic and cardiorespiratory measures of mental effort: The effects of level of difficulty in a working memory task, Int J Psychophysiol, 16, 57–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahrick H.P., Fitts P.M. & Rankin R.E. 1952. Effect of incentives upon reactions to peripheral stimuli. J Exp Psychol, 44, 400.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brehm J.W. & Self E.A. 1989. The intensity of motivation. Annu Rev Psychol, 40, 109–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capa R.L., Audiffren M. & Ragot S. 2008a. The effects of achievement motivation, task difficulty, and goal difficulty on physiological, behavioral, and subjective effort. Psychophysiology, 45(5), 859–868.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Capa R.L., Audiffren M. & Ragot S. 2008b. The interactive effect of achievement motivation and task difficulty on mental effort. Int J Psychophysiol, 70(2), 144–150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cox R., Alexander G. & Gilmore C. 1987. Development of the connected speech test (CST). Ear Hear, 8(5 Suppl.), 119s–126s.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cox R., Alexander G., Gilmore C. & Pusakulich K. 1988. Use of the connected speech test (CST) with hearing-impaired listeners. Ear Hear, 9(4), 198–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci E.L. 1971. Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. J Pers Soc Psycholy, 18, 105–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci E.L., Koestner R. & Ryan R.M. 1999. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychol Bull, 125, 627–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demorest M.E. & Erdman S.A. 1986. Scale composition and item analysis of the communication profile for the hearing impaired. J Speech Hear Res, 29, 515–535.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Easterbrook J.A. 1959. The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychol Rev, 66, 183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastwick P.W., Hunt L.L. & Neff L.A. 2013. External validity, why art thou externally valid? Recent studies of attraction provide three theoretical answers. Soc Personal Psychol Compass, 7, 275–288.
   Google Scholar
• Erber N.P. 1969. Interaction of audition and vision in recognition of oral speech stimuli. J Speech Hear Res, 12, 423–425.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fowles D.C., Fisher A.E. & Tranel D.T. 1982. The heart beats to reward: The effect of monetary incentive on heart rate. Psychophysiology, 19, 506–513.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fraser S., Gagne J., Alepins M. & Dubois P. 2010. Evaluating the effort expended to understand speech in noise using a dual-task paradigm: The effects of providing visual speech cues. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 53, 18–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S. & Noble W. 2004. The speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol, 43, 85–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendolla G.H. & Richter M. 2005. Ego involvement and effort: Cardiovascular, electrodermal, and performance effects. Psychophysiology, 42, 595–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendolla G.H. & Richter M. 2006. Cardiovascular reactivity during performance under social observation: The moderating role of task difficulty. Int J Psychophysiol, 62, 185–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendolla G.H. & Richter M. 2010. Effort mobilization when the self is involved: Some lessons from the cardiovascular system. Rev Gen Psychol, 14, 212–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallberg L.R-M. & Carlsson S.G. 1991. A qualitative study of strategies for managing a hearing impairment. Br J Audiol, 25, 201–211.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hallberg L.R. & Barrenäs M-L. 1995. Coping with noise-induced hearing loss: Experiences from the perspective of middle-aged male victims. Br J Audiol, 29, 219–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetherington R. 1954. The Shellen chart as a test of visual acuity. Psychol Res, 24, 349–357.
   Google Scholar
• Hétu R., Riverin L., Lalande N., Getty L. & St-cyr C. 1988. Qualitative analysis of the handicap associated with occupational hearing loss. Br J Audiol, 22, 251–264.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hicks C. & Tharpe A. 2002. Listening effort and fatigue in school-age children with and without hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 45, 573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hockey R.G.J. 1997. Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: A cognitive-energetical framework. Biol Psychol, 45, 73–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsby B.W. 2013. The effects of hearing-aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands. Ear Hear, 34, 523–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys M.S. & Revelle W. 1984. Personality, motivation, and performance: A theory of the relationship between individual differences and information processing. Psychol Rev, 91, 153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman D. 1973. Attention and Effort. Englewood Cliffs, USA: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kühberger A., Schulte-Mecklenbeck M. & Perner J. 2002. Framing decisions: Hypothetical and real. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process, 89, 1162–1175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G.F., Weber E.U., Hsee C.K. & Welch N. 2001. Risk as feelings. Psychol Bull, 127, 267–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcora S.M., Staiano W. & Manning V. 2009. Mental fatigue impairs physical performance in humans. J Appl Physiol, 106, 857–864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy S., Tun P., Cox C., Colangelo M., Stewart R. et al. 2005. Hearing loss and perceptual effort: Downstream effects on older adults’ memory for speech. Q J Exp Psychol A, 58, 22–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara H. & Fisch R. 1964. Effect of high and low motivation on two aspects of attention. Percept Mot Skills, 19, 571–578.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meyer D. & Schvaneveldt R. 1971. Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. J Exp Psychol, 90, 227–234.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meyer D.R., Bahrick H.P. & Fitts P.M. 1953. Incentive, anxiety, and the human blink rate. J Exp Psychol, 45, 183–187.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murphy D., Craik F., Li K. & Schneider B. 2000. Comparing the effects of aging and background noise on short-term memory performance. Psychol Aging, 15, 323–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachtegaal J., Kuik D.J., Anema J.R., Goverts S.T., Festen J.M. et al. 2009. Hearing status, need for recovery after work, and psychosocial work characteristics: Results from an internet-based national survey on hearing. Int J Audiol, 48, 684–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng E.H.N., Rudner M., Lunner T., Pedersen M.S. & Rönnberg J. 2013. Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users. Int J Audiol, 52, 433–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picou E.M., Ricketts T.A. & Hornsby B.W. 2013. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort. Ear Hear, 34, e54–e62.
   Google Scholar
• Picou E.M., Ricketts T.A. & Hornsby B.W.Y. 2011. Visual cues and listening effort: Individual variability. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 54, 1416–1430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piquado T., Isaacowitz D. & Wingfield A. 2010. Pupillometry as a measure of cognitive effort in younger and older adults. Psychophysiology, 47, 560–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabbitt P. 1991. Mild hearing loss can cause apparent memory failures which increase with age and reduce with IQ. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 111, 167–176.
   Google Scholar
• Rabbitt P.M. 1968. Channel-capacity, intelligibility and immediate memory. Q J Exp Psychol, 20, 241–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringdahl A. & Grimby A. 2000. Severe-profound hearing impairment and health-related quality of life among post-lingual deafened Swedish adults. Scan Audiol, 29, 266–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roets A., Van Hiel A., Cornelis I. & Soetens B. 2008. Determinants of task performance and invested effort: A need for closure by relative cognitive capacity interaction analysis. Pers Soc Psychol Rev, 34, 779–792.
   Google Scholar
• Rudner M., Lunner T., Behrens T., Thoren E.S. & Ronnberg J. 2012. Working memory capacity may influence perceived effort during aided speech recognition in noise. J Am Acad Audiol, 23, 577–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarampalis A., Kalluri S., Edwards B. & Hafter E. 2009. Objective measures of listening effort: Effects of background noise and noise reduction. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 52, 1230–1240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scher H., Furedy J.J. & Heslegrave R.J. 1984. Phasic T-Wave amplitude and heart rate changes as indices of mental effort and task incentive. Psychophysiology, 21, 326–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tun P., McCoy S. & Wingfield A. 2009. Aging, hearing acuity, and the attentional costs of effortful listening. Psychol Aging, 24, 761–766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright R.A., Contrada R.J. & Patane M.J. 1986. Task difficulty, cardiovascular response, and the magnitude of goal valence. J Pers Soc Psychol, 51, 837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright R.A., Dill J.C., Geen R.G. & Anderson C.A. 1998. Social evaluation influence on cardiovascular response to a fixed behavioral challenge: Effects across a range of difficulty levels. Ann Behav Med, 20, 277–285.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zekveld A.A., Kramer S.E. & Festen J.M. 2011. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: The influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response. Ear Hear, 32, 498–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar