Assessing variability in audiovisual speech integration skills using capacity and accuracy measures

References

• Altieri N., Pisoni D.B. & Townsend J.T. 2011. Behavioral, clinical, and neurobiological constraints on theories of audiovisual speech integration: A review and suggestions for new directions. Seeing and Perceiving, 24, 513–539.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Altieri N., Pisoni D.B. & Townsend J.T. 2011. Some normative data on lip-reading skills. J Acoust Soc Am, 130, 1–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altieri N. & Townsend J.T. 2011. An assessment of behavioral dynamic information processing measures in audiovisual speech perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altieri N., Townsend J.T. & Wenger M.J. 2013. A dynamic assessment function for measuring age-related sensory decline in audiovisual speech recognition. Behav Res Methods.
   Google Scholar
• Altieri N. & Wenger M. 2013. Neural dynamics of audiovisual integration efficiency under variable listening conditions. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranyaiova-Frtusova J., Winneke A. & Phillips N. 2010. The effect of audio-visual speech information on working memory in younger and older adults. Cognitive Aging Conference (CAC), Atlanta, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Bent T., Buchwald & Pisoni D.B. 2009. Perceptual adaptation and intelligibility of multiple talkers for two types of degraded speech. J Acoust Soc Am, 126, 2660–2669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergeson T.R. & Pisoni D.B. 2004. Audiovisual speech perception in deaf adults and children following cochlear implantation. In: G. Calvert, C. Spence, B.E. Stein (eds.), The Handbook of Multisensory Processes. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press, pp. 749–771.
   Google Scholar
• Bergeson T.R., Pisoni D.B., Reese L. & Kirk K.I. 2003. Audiovisual speech perception in adult cochlear implant users: Effects of sudden vs. progressive hearing loss. Mid-Winter Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology; Daytona Beach, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein L.E., Demorest M.E. & Tucker P.E. 2000. Speech perception without hearing. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 233–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boothroyd A., Hanin L. & Hnath T. 1985. A Sentence Test of Speech Perception: Reliability, Set Equivalence, and Short-term Learning (internal report RCI 10). New York: City University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Braida L.D. 1991. Crossmodal integration in the identification of consonant segments. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, 647–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchan J.N. & Munhall K.G. 2012. The effect of a concurrent cognitive load task and temporal offsets on the integration of auditory and visual speech information, Seeing and Perceiving, 25, 87–106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clouser R.A. 1977. Relative phoneme visibility and lipreading performance. Volta Review, Jan.27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Erber N.P. 1969. Interaction of audition and vision in the recognition of oral speech stimuli. J Sp Hear Res, 12, 423–425.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Erber N.P. 1975. Auditory-visual perception of speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 40, 481–492.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Erber N.P. 2002. Hearing, Vision, Communication, and Older People. Clifton Hill, Australia: Clavis Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Erber N.P. 2003. Use of hearing aids by older people: Influence of non-auditory factors (vision, manual dexterity). Int J Audiol, 42, 2S21–2S26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feld J. & Sommers M.S. 2009. Lipreading, processing speed, and working memory in younger and older adults. J Sp Lang Hear Res, 52, 1555–1565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant K.W. 2002. Measures of auditory-visual integration for speech understanding: A theoretical perspective (L). J Acoust Soc Am, 112, 30–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant K.W. & Seitz P.F. 1998. Measures of auditory-visual integration in nonsense syllables and sentences. J Acoust Soc Am, 104, 2438–2450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant K.W. & Walden B.E. 1996. Evaluating the articulation index for audio-visual consonant recognition. J Acoust Soc Am, 100, 2415–2424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant K.W., Walden B.E. & Seitz P.F. 1998. Auditory-visual speech recognition by hearing impaired subjects: Consonant recognition, sentence recognition, and auditory-visual integration. J Acoust Soc Am, 103, 2677–2690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massaro D.W. 2004. From multisensory integration to talking heads and language learning. In: G. A. Calvert, C. Spence, B.E. Stein (eds.), The Handbook of Multisensory Processes, Cambridge, USA: The MIT Press, pp. 153–176.
   Google Scholar
• McGurk H. & Macdonald J.W. 1976. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746–748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller J. 1982. Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals. Cognit Psychol, 14, 247–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens E. & Blazek B. 1985. Visemes observed by hearing impaired and normal hearing adults viewers. J Sp Hear Res, 28, 381–393.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ratcliff R., Thapar A. & McKoon G. 2004. A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging on recognition memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 408–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherffert S., Lachs L. & Hernandez L.R. 1997. The Hoosier audiovisual multi-talker database. In: Research on Spoken Language Processing Progress Report No. 21, Bloomington, USA: Speech Research Laboratory, Psychology, Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Sommers M., Tye-Murray N. & Spehar B. 2005. Auditory-visual speech perception and auditory-visual enhancement in normal-hearing younger and older adults. Ear Hear, 26, 263–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumby W.H. & Pollack I. 1954. Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 26, 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Summerfield Q. 1987. Some preliminaries to a comprehensive account of audio-visual speech perception. In: B. Dodd, R. Campbell (eds.), The Psychology of Lip-Reading. Hillsdale, USA: LEA, pp. 3–50.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend J.T. & Altieri N. 2012. An accuracy-response time capacity assessment function that measures performance against standard parallel predictions. Psychol Rev, 119, 500–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend J.T. & Nozawa G. 1995. Spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: An investigation of parallel, serial, and coactive theories. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39, 321–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend J.T. & Wenger M.J. 2004. A theory of interactive parallel processing: New capacity measures and predictions for a response time inequality series. Psychol Rev, 111, 1003–1035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tye-Murray N., Sommers M. & Spehar B. 2007. Audiovisual integration and lip-reading abilities of older adults with normal and impaired hearing. Ear Hear, 28, 656–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson C.S., Qiu W., Chamberlain M.M. & Li X. 1996. Auditory and visual speech perception: Sources of individual differences in speech recognition. J Acoust Soc Am, 100, 1153–1162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger M.J., Negash S., Petersen R.C. & Petersen L. 2010. Modeling and estimating recall processing capacity: Sensitivity and diagnostic utility in application to mild cognitive impairment. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54, 73–89.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winneke A.H. & Phillips N.A. 2011. Does audiovisual speech offer a fountain of youth for old ears? An event-related brain potential study of age differences in audiovisual speech perception. Psychology and Aging, 26, 427–438.
   Google Scholar
• Zekveld A.A., George E.L.J., Houtgast T. & Kramer S.E. 2013. Cognitive abilities relate to-self-reported hearing disability. J Sp Lang Hear Res, 56, 1364–1372.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zekveld A.A., Kramer S.E., Kessens J.M., Vlaming M.S. & Houtgast T. 2009. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system. Ear Hear, 30, 262–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar