One-day measurement to assess the auditory risks encountered by noise-exposed workers

References

• Avan P. & Bonfils P. 1993. Frequency specificity of human distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Audiol, 32, 12–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campo P., Morata T. & Hong O. 2013. Chemical exposure and hearing loss. Disease-a-Month, 59, 4, 119–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallos P. 1992. The active cochlea. J Neurosci, 12, 4575–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis H. 1983. An active process in cochlear mechanics. Hear Res, 9, 79–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Directive 2003/10/EC. On the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (noise). Official Journal of the European Communities, L042, 38–44.
   Google Scholar
• Finlayson P. & Kaltenbach J. 2009. Alterations in the spontaneous discharge patterns of single units in the dorsal cochlear nucleus following intense sound exposure. Hear Res, 256, 104–117.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gaskill S. & Brown A. 1990. The behavior of the acoustic distortion product 2f1-f2 from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity. J Acoust Soc Am, 88, 821–839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamernik R., Patterson J., Turrentine G. & Ahroon W. 1989. The quantitative relation between sensory cell loss and hearing thresholds. Hear Res, 38, 199–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Job A., Raynal M., Kossowski M., Studler M., Ghernaouti C. et al. 2009. Otoacoustic detection of risk of early hearing loss in ears with normal audiograms: A three-year follow-up study. Hear Res, 251, 10–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaltenbach J. & Zhang J. 2007. Intense-sound plasticity in the dorsal cochlear nucleus of rats: Evidence for cholinergic receptor upregulation. Hear Res, 226, 232–243.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laroche C., Hétu R. & Poirier S. 1989. The growth of and recovery from TTS in human subjects exposed to impact noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 85, 1681–90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lonsbury-Martin B., Cutler W. & Martin G. 1991. Evidence for influence of aging on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humansJ Acoust Soc Am, 89, 1749–1759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonsbury-Martin B., Whitehead M. & Martin G. 1993. Distortion- product otoacoustic emissions in normal and impaired ears: Insight into generation processes. Prog Brain Res, 97, 77–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Poveda E. & Johannesen P. 2009. Otoacoustic emission theories and behavioral estimates of human basilar membrane motion are mutually consistent. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 10, 511–523.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marshall L., Lapsley Miller J. & Heller M. 2001. Distortion- product otoacoustic emissions as a screening tool or noise-induced hearing loss. Noise Health, 3, 12, 43–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McBride D. & Williams S. 2013. Audiometric notch as a sign of noise-induced hearing loss. Occup Environ Med, 2001, 58, 46–51.
   Google Scholar
• Mulders W. & Robertson D. 2013. Development of hyperactivity after acoustic trauma in the guinea pig inferior colliculus. Hear Res, 298, 104–108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Müller J. & Janssen T. 2008. Impact of occupational noise on pure-tone threshold and distortion product otoacoustic emissions after one workday. Hear Res, 246, 9–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely S., Johnson T. & Kopun, J. 2009. Distortion-product otoacoustic emission I/O characteristics in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears. J Acoust Soc Am, 126, 728–738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson D., Nelson R., Concha-Barrientos M. & Fingerhut M. 2005. The global burden of occupational noise-induced hearing loss. Am J Ind Med, 48, 446–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NORA. National Occupational Research Agenda. 1996. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. pp. 1–73.
   Google Scholar
• Oeken J., Lenk A. & Bootz F. Influence of age and presbycusis on DPOAE. Acta Otolaryngol, 2000, 120, 396–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OSHA. 1910. 95 Occupational Safety and Health Standards, available on line at https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table = STANDARDS&p_id = 9735
   Google Scholar
• Ruggero M., Rich N., Recio A. & Narayan S. 1997. Basilar- membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am, 101, 2151–2163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seixas N., Kujawa S., Norton S., Sheppard L., Neitzel R. et al. 2013. Predictors of hearing threshold levels and distortion product otoacoustic emissions among noise exposed young adults. Occup Environ Med, 61, 899–907.
   Google Scholar
• Syka J. 2002. Plastic changes in the central auditory system after hearing loss, restoration of function, and during learning. Physiol Rev, 82, 601–628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venet T., Rumeau C., Campo P., Rieger B., Thomas A. et al. 2011. Neuronal circuits involved in the middle-ear acoustic ref. Tox Sci, 119, 146–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venet T., Campo P., Rumeau C., Eluecque H. & Parietti- Winkler C. 2012. EchoScan: A new system to objectively assess peripheral hearing disorders. Noise Health, 14, 60, 253–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wagner W., Heppelmann G., Müller J., Janssen T. & Zenner H.P. 2007. Olivocochlear reflex effect on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions is largest at frequencies with distinct fine structure dips. Hear Res, 223, 83–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead W., McCoy M., Lonsbury-Martin B. & Martin G. 1995. Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. Effects of decreasing L2 below L1. J Acoust Soc Am, 97, 2346–2358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar