Hearing dummies: Individualized computer models of hearing impairment

References

• Brown G.J., Ferry R.T. & Meddis R. 2010. A computer model of auditory efferent suppression: Implications for the recognition of speech in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 127, 943–954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce I.C., Sachs M.B. & Young E.D. 2003. An auditory-periphery model of the effects of acoustic trauma on auditory nerve responses. J Acoust Soc Am, 113, 369–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark N.R., Brown G., Jürgens T. & Meddis R. 2012. A frequency- selective feedback model of auditory efferent suppression and its implications for the recognition of speech in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 123, 1535–1541.
   Google Scholar
• Dubno J.R., Eckert M.A., Lee F.S., Matthews L.J. & Schmiedt R.A. 2013. Classifying human audiometric phenotypes of age-related hearing loss from animal models. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 14, 687–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feuerstein J.F. 2002. Occupational hearing conservation. In: J. Katz (ed.), Handbook of Clinical Audiology. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Heinz M.G., Zhang X., Bruce I.C. & Carney L.H. 2001. Auditory nerve model for predicting performance limits of normal and impaired listeners. Acoustics Research Letters Online, 2, 91–96.
   Google Scholar
• Jepsen M.L. & Dau T. 2011. Characterizing auditory processing and perception in individual listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am, 129, 262–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecluyse W. & Meddis R. 2009. A simple single-interval adaptive procedure for estimating thresholds in normal and impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 126, 2570–2579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecluyse W., Tan C.M., McFerran D. & Meddis R. 2013. Acquisition of auditory profiles for good and impaired hearing. Int J Audiol, 52, 596–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Poveda E.A. & Meddis R. 2001. A human nonlinear cochlear filterbank. J Acoust Soc Am, 110, 3107–3118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meddis R. 2006. Auditory-nerve first-spike latency and auditory absolute threshold: A computer model. J Acoust Soc Am, 119, 406–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meddis R., Lecluyse W., Tan C.W., Panda M.R. & Ferry R.T. 2010. Beyond the audiogram: Identifying and modeling patterns of hearing deficits. In: E.A. Lopez-Poveda, A.R. Palmer, R. Meddis (eds.). The Neurophysiological Bases of Auditory Perception. New York: Springer, pp. 631–640.
   Google Scholar
• Mills D.M., Norton S.J. & Rubel E.W. 1993. Vulnerability and adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions to endocochlear potential variation. J Acoust Soc Am, 94, 2108–2122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. & Alcántara J.I. 2001. The use of psychophysical tuning curves to explore dead regions in the cochlea. Ear Hear, 22, 268–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panda M.R. 2010. Computer Models of Normal and Impaired Hearing. PhD thesis, University of Essex, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggero M.A. & Rich N.C. 1991. Furosemide alters organ of corti mechanics: Evidence for feedback of outer hair cells upon the basilar membrane. J Neurosci, 11, 1057–1067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmiedt R.A., Lang H., Okamura H.O. & Schulte B.A. 2002. Effects of furosemide applied chronically to the round window: A model of metabolic presbyacusis. J Neurosci, 22, 9643–9650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuknecht H.F. 1964. Further observations on the pathology of presbycusis. Arch Otolaryngol, 80, 369–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuknecht H.F. & Gacek M.R. 1993. Cochlear pathology in presbycusis. Acta Oto Rhinol Laryngol, 102, 1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan C.M., Lecluyse W., McFerran D. & Meddis R. 2013. Tinnitus patterns and hearing loss. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 14, 275–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zilany M.S.A. & Bruce I.C. 2006. Modeling auditory-nerve responses for high sound pressure levels in the normal and impaired auditory periphery. J Acoust Soc Am, 120, 1446–1466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar