Repeatability, agreement, and feasibility of using the threshold equalizing noise test and fast psychophysical tuning curves in a clinical setting

References

• ANSI S3.1-1999. Maximum permissible ambient noise levels for audiometric test rooms.
   Google Scholar
• Baer T., Moore B.C.J. & Kluk K. 2002. Effects of low pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without DRs at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am, 112, 1133–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland J.M. & Altman D.G. 1986. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet, 1, 307–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Society of Audiology (BSA). 2011. Recommended procedure: Pure tone air- and bone-conduction threshold audiometry with and without masking and determination of uncomfortable loudness levels.
   Google Scholar
• Cairns S., Frith R., Munro K.J. & Moore B.C.J. 2007. Repeatability of the TEN(HL) test for detecting cochlear DRs. Int J Audiol, 46, 575–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R.M., Alexander G.C., Johnson J. & Rivera I. 2011. Cochlear dead regions in typical hearing aid candidates: Prevalence and implications for use of high-frequency speech cues. Ear Hear, 32, 339–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R.M., Alexander G.C., Johnson J. & Rivera I. 2012. Implication of high-frequency cochlear dead regions for fitting hearing aids to adults with mild to moderately severe hearing loss. Ear Hear, 33, 573–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasberg B.R. & Moore B.C.J. 1986. Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments. J Acoust Soc Am, 79, 1020–1033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluk K. & Moore B.C.J. 2004. Factors affecting psychophysical tuning curves for normally hearing subjects. Hear Res, 194, 118–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluk K. & Moore B.C.J. 2005. Factors affecting psychophysical tuning curves for hearing impaired subjects with high-frequency DRs. Hear Res, 200, 115–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluk K. & Moore B.C.J. 2006b. Detecting dead regions using psychophysical tuning curves: A comparison of simultaneous and forward masking. Int J Audiol, 45, 463–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackersie C.L., Crocker T.L. & Davis R.A. 2004. Limiting high-frequency hearing aid gain in listeners with and without suspected cochlear DRs. J Am Acad Audiol, 15, 498–507.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malicka A.N., Munro K.J. & Baker R.J. 2009. Fast method for psychophysical tuning curve measurement in school-age children. Int J Audiol, 48, 546–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malicka A.N., Munro K.J. & Baker, R.J. 2010. Diagnosing cochlear dead regions in children. Ear Hear, 31, 238–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. & Alcantara J.I. 2001. The use of psychophysical tuning curves to explore dead regions in the cochlea. Ear Hear, 22, 268–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Huss M., Vickers D.A., Glasberg B.R. & Alcantara J.I. 2000. A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea. Br J Audiol, 34, 205–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R. & Stone M.A. 2004. New version of the TEN-test with calibrations in dB HL. Ear Hear, 25, 478–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. 2001. Dead regions in the cochlea: Diagnosis, perceptual consequences, and implications for the fitting of hearing aids. Trends Amplif, 5, 1–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. 2002. Psychoacoustics of normal and impaired hearing. British Medical Bulletin, 63, 121–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. 2004. DRs in the cochlea: Conceptual foundations, diagnosis, and clinical applications. Ear Hear, 25, 98–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro K.J., Felthouse C. & Moore B.C.J. 2005. Reassessment of cochlear dead region in hearing-impaired teenagers with severe-to-profound hearing loss. Int J Audiol, 44, 8, 470–477.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pepler A., Munro K.J., Lewis K. & Kluk K. 2014. Prevalence of new referrals and existing hearing aid users. Ear Hear, 35, 289–386.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Preminger J.E., Carpenter R. & Ziegler C.H. 2005. A clinical perspective on cochlear dead regions: Intelligibility of speech and subjective hearing aid benefit. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 600–613.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sek A., Alcantara J., Moore B.C.J., Kluk K. & Wicher A. 2005. Development of a fast method for determining psychophysical tuning curves. Int J Audiol, 44, 408–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sek A. & Moore B.C.J. 2011. Implementation of a fast method for measuring psychophysical tuning curves. Int J Audiol, 50, 237–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers V., Molis M.R., Musch H., Walden B.E., Surr R.K. et al. 2003. Identifying dead regions in the cochlea: Psychophysical tuning curves and tone detection in threshold-equalising noise. Ear Hear, 24, 133–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickers D.A., Moore B.C.J. & Baer T. 2001. Effects of low-pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am, 110, 1164–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vestergaard M.D. 2003. Dead regions in the cochlea: Implications for speech recognition and applicability of articulation index theory. Int J Audiol, 42, 249–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinay & Moore B.C.J. 2007. Prevalence of dead regions in subjects with sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear, 28, 231–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warnaar B. & Dreschler W. 2012. Agreement between psychophysical tuning curves and the threshold equalising noise test in dead region identification. Int J Audiol, 51, 456–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warnaar B. & Dreschler W. 2013. Simulating psychophysical tuning curves in listeners with dead regions. Int J Audiol, 52, 533–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwicker E. & Schorn K. 1978. Psychoacoustical tuning curves in audiology. Audiol, 17, 120–140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar