Adaptive tests of temporal resolution: Comparison with the gaps-in-noise test in normal-hearing young adults

References

• American Academy of Audiology. 2010. Diagnosis, treatment and management of children and adults with central auditory processing disorder. Available from http://www.audiology.org/resources/documentlibrary/Pages/CentralAuditoryProcessingDisorder.aspx
   Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 1996. Central auditory processing: Current status of research and implications for clinical practice. Am J Audiol, 5, 41–54.
   Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 2005. (Central) auditory processing disorders - The role of the audiologist. Available from www.asha.org/policy.
   Google Scholar
• Bamiou D.E., Musiek F.E., Stow I., Stevens J., Cipolotti L. et al. 2006. Auditory temporal processing deficits in patients with insular stroke. Neurol, 67, 614–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland J.M. & Altman D.G. 1986. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet, i, 307–310.
   Google Scholar
• Chan A.W.H. 2008. Gaps-in-noise test: Norms for Cantonese adults in Hong Kong. Unpublished Master of Science (Audiology) dissertation, The University of Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Chan P.H.L. 2008. Mandarin dichotic digit test: Normative findings for Mandarin-speaking young adults. Unpublished Master of Science (Audiology) dissertation, The University of Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Chermak G.D. & Lee J. 2005. Comparison of children's performance on four tests of temporal resolution. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 554–563.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chermak G.D., Silva M.E., Nye J., Hasbrouck J. & Musiek F.E. 2007. An update on professional education and clinical practices in central auditory processing. J Am Acad Audiol, 18, 428–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R.M. 1985. A structured approach to hearing-aid selection. Ear Hear, 6, 226–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R.M. 1989. Comfortable loudness level: Stimulus effects, long-term reliability, and predictability. J Speech Hear Res, 32, 816–828.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jerger J. & Musiek F. 2000. Report of the consensus conference on the diagnosis of auditory processing disorders in school-aged children. J Am Acad Audiol, 11, 467–474.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keith K.W. 2000. Random Gap Detection Test. St. Louis: Auditec.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer S.E., Kapteyn T.S., Festen J.M. & Tobi H. 1995. Factors in subjective hearing disability. Audiol, 34, 311–320.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levitt H. 1971. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am, 49, 467–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lister J.J. & Roberts R.A. 2010. Adaptive Tests of Temporal Resolution (ATTR): University of South Florida Hearing Clinic Protocol. University of South Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Lister J.J., Roberts R.A., Krause J.C., DeBiase D. & Carlson H. 2011a. An adaptive clinical test of temporal resolution: Within-channel and across-channel gap detection. Int J Audiol, 50, 375–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lister J.J., Roberts R.A. & Lister F.L. 2011b. An adaptive clinical test of temporal resolution: Age effects. Int J Audiol, 50, 367–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lister J.J., Roberts R.A., Shackelford J. & Rogers C.L. 2006. An adaptive clinical test of temporal resolution. Am J Audiol, 15, 133–140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCroskey R.L. & Keith R.W. 1996. Auditory Fusion Test - Revised: Instructions and User's Manual. St. Louis: Auditec.
   Google Scholar
• Musiek F.E., Shinn J.B., Jirsa R., Bamiou D.E., Baran J.A. et al. 2005. GIN (gaps-in-noise) test performance in subjects with confirmed central auditory nervous system involvement. Ear Hear, 26, 608–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson P.B. & Thomas S.D. 1997. Gap detection as a function of stimulus loudness for listeners with and without hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 40, 1387–1394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson M., Soli S.D. & Sullivan J.A. 1994. Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 95, 1085–1099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxenham A.J. 2000. Influence of spatial and temporal coding on auditory gap detection. J Acoust Soc Am, 107, 2215–2223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulovicks J. 2008. The gaps-in-noise (GIN) test and its diagnostic significance. Hear J, 61, 67.
   Google Scholar
• Philips D.P. 1999. Auditory gap detection, perceptual channels, and temporal resolution in speech perception. J Am Acad Audiol, 10, 343–354.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Philips D.P., Taylor T.L., Hall S.E., Carr M.M. & Mossop J.E. 1997. Detection of silent intervals between noises activating different perceptual channels: Some properties of “central” auditory gap detection. J Acoust Soc Am, 101, 3694–3705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp R. 1964. Rate of decay of auditory sensation. J Acoust Soc Am, 36, 277–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts R.A. & Lister J.J. 2004. Effects of age and hearing loss on gap detection and the precedence effect: Broadband stimuli. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 47, 965–978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samelli A.G. & Schochat E. 2008. The gaps-in-noise test: Gap detection thresholds in normal-hearing young adults. Int J Audiol, 47, 238–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinn J.B. 2003. Temporal processing: The basics. Hear J, 56(7), 52.
   Google Scholar
• Shinn J. 2007. Temporal processing and temporal patterning tests. In: F.E. Musiek, G.D. Chermak (eds). Handbook of (Central) Auditory Processing Disorder:. Vol. 1. San Diego: Plural Publishing, pp. 231–256.
   Google Scholar
• Shinn J.B., Chermak G.D. & Musiek F.E. 2009. GIN (gaps-in-noise) performance in the pediatric population. J Am Acad Audiol, 20, 229–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor M., Forbes S. & Creelman C. 1983. PEST reduces bias in forced-choice psychophysics. J Acoust Soc Am, 74, 1367–1374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan K.K. & Wong L.L.N. 2002. Tympanometric norms for Chinese young adults. Ear Hear, 23, 416–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weihing J.A., Musiek F.E. & Shinn J.B. 2007. The effect of presentation level on the gaps-in-noise (GIN) test. J Am Acad Audiol, 18, 141–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yim P.K. 2003. Random Gap Detection Test: Normative values for Hong Kong young adults. Unpublished Bachelor of Science (Speech and Hearing Sciences) dissertation, The University of Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar