Prosody perception and musical pitch discrimination in adults using cochlear implants

References

• Arnoldner C., Riss D., Brunner M., Durisin M., Baumgartner W-D. et al. 2007. Speech and music perception with the new fine structure speech coding strategy: Preliminary results. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 127, 1298–1303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum K. & Nowicki S. 1998. Perception of emotion: Measuring decoding accuracy of adult prosodic cues varying in intensity. J Nonverbal Behav, 22, 89–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma P. & Weenink D. 2001. PRAAT, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot Int, 5, 341–345.
   Google Scholar
• Carlyon R.P., Deeks J.M. & McKay C.M. 2010. The upper limit of temporal pitch for cochlear-implant listeners: Stimulus duration, conditioner pulses, and the number of electrodes stimulated. J Acoust Soc Am, 127, 1469–1478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlyon R.P., van Wieringen A., Long C.J., Deeks J.M. & Wouters J. 2002. Temporal pitch mechanisms in acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am, 112, 621–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H. & Zeng F-G. 2004. Frequency modulation detection in cochlear implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am, 116, 2269–2277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun D.M. 2002. Discourse Intonation in L2 from Theory and Research to Practice. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper W.E. & Paccia-Cooper J. 1980. Syntax and Speech. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper W.B., Tobey E. & Loizou P.C. 2008. Music perception by cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners as measured by the Montreal battery for evaluation of amusia. Ear Hear, 29, 618–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coutinho E. & Dibben N. 2013. Psychoacoustic cues to emotion in speech prosody and music. Cogn Emot, 27, 658–684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson L.S., Geers A.E. & Brenner C. 2010. Cochlear implant characteristics and speech perception skills of adolescents with long-term device use. Otol Neurotol, 31, 1310–1314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drennan W.R. & Rubinstein J.T. 2008. Music perception in cochlear implant users and its relationship with psychophysical capabilities. J Rehabil Res Dev, 45, 779–789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu Q-J., Galvin J.J. III. & Wang X. 2001. Recognition of time-distorted sentences by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 109, 379–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin J.J. III., Fu Q-J. & Nogaki G. 2007. Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners. Ear Hear, 28, 302–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurts L. & Wouters J. 2004. Better place-coding of the fundamental frequency in cochlear implants. J Acous Soc Am, 115, 844–852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gfeller K., Turner C., Mehr M., Woodworth G., Fearn R. et al. 2002a. Recognition of familiar melodies by adult cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults. Cochlear Implants Int, 3, 29–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gfeller K., Witt S., Woodworth G., Mehr M.A. & Knutson J. 2002b. Effects of frequency, instrumental family, and cochlear implant type on timbre recognition and appraisal. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 111, 349–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gfeller K., Woodworth G., Robin D.A., Witt S. & Knutson J.F. 1997. Perception of rhythmic and sequential pitch patterns by normally-hearing adults and adult cochlear implant users. Ear Hear, 18, 252–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gharahdaghi N. 2013. Receptive Prosody in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Master's thesis, University of Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Green T., Faulkner A. & Rosen S. 2002. Spectral and temporal cues to pitch in noise-excited vocoder simulations of continuous-interleaved-sampling cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am, 112, 2155–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green T., Faulkner A., Rosen S. & Macherey O. 2005. Enhancement of temporal periodicity cues in cochlear implants: Effects on prosodic perception and vowel identification. J Acoust Soc Am, 118, 375–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heng J., Cantarero G., Elhilali M. & Limb C.J. 2011. Impaired perception of temporal fine structure and musical timbre in cochlear implant users. Hear Res, 280, 192–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschberg J. 2002. Communication and prosody: Functional aspects of prosody. Speech Commun, 36, 31–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden L.K., Skinner M.W., Holden T.A. & Demorest M.E. 2002. Effects of stimulation rate with the Nucleus 24 ACE speech coding strategy. Ear Hear, 23, 463–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopyan-Misakyan T.M., Gordon K.A., Dennis M. & Papsin B.C. 2009. Recognition of affective speech prosody and facial affect in deaf children with unilateral right cochlear implants. Child Neuropsychol, 15, 136–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopyan T., Peretz I., Chan L.P., Papsin B.C. & Gordon K.A. 2012. Children using cochlear implants capitalize on acoustical hearing for music perception. Front Psychol, 3, 425–446.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson D.H. 1980. The relationship between spike rate and synchrony in responses of auditory-nerve fibers to single tones. J Acoust Soc Am, 68, 1115–1122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefer J., Hohl S., Stürzebecher E., Pfennigdorff T. & Gstöettner W. 2001. Comparison of speech recognition with different speech coding strategies (SPEAK, CIS, and ACE) and their relationship to telemetric measures of compound action potentials in the nucleus CI 24M cochlear implant system. Audiology, 40, 32–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koelsch S., Wittfoth M., Wolf A., Müller J. & Hahne A. 2004. Music perception in cochlear implant users: An event-related potential study. Clin Neurophysiol, 115, 966–972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong Y.Y. & Carlyon R.P. 2010. Temporal pitch perception at high rates in cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am, 127, 3114–3123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong Y., Cruz R., Jones J. & Zeng F. 2004. Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing. Ear Hear, 25, 173–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong Y., Stickney G. & Zeng F. 2005. Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am, 117, 1351–1361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kral A., Hartmann R., Mortazavi D. & Klinke R. 1998. Spatial resolution of cochlear implants: The electrical field and excitation of auditory afferents. Hear Res, 121, 11–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krumhansl C.L. & Iverson P. 1992. Perceptual interactions between musical pitch and timbre. J Exp Psychol, 18, 739–751.
   Google Scholar
• Landwehr M., Pyschny V., Walger M., von Wedel H. & Meister H. 2007. Prosody perception in cochlear implant recipients wearing a hearing aid in the contralateral ear. Paper presented at the 8th EFAS Congress, Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Laneau J., Wouters J. & Moonen M. 2004. Relative contributions of temporal and place pitch cues to fundamental frequency discrimination in cochlear implantees. J Acoust Soc Am, 116, 3606–3619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leal M., Shin Y., Laborde M., Calmels M., Vergas S. et al. 2003. Music perception in adult cochlear implant recipients. Acta Otolaryngol, 123, 826–835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litovsky R.Y., Johnstone P.M. & Godar S.P. 2006. Benefits of bilateral cochlear implants and/or hearing aids in children. Int J Audiol, 45, 78–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looi V. 2008. The effect of cochlear implantation on music perception: A review. Otorinolaryngol, 58, 169–190.
   Google Scholar
• Looi V., McDermott H., McKay C. & Hickson, L. 2004. Pitch discrimination and melody recognition by cochlear implant users. International Congress Series, 1273, 197–200.
   Google Scholar
• Looi V.W., McDermott H., McKay C. & Hickson L. 2008. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing-aid users. Ear Hear, 29, 421–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo X., Fu Q-J. & Galvin, J J. 2007. Vocal emotion recognition by normal- hearing listeners and cochlear implant users. Trends Amplif, 11, 301–315.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Markham R. & Adams K. 1992. The effect of type of task on children's identification of facial expressions. J Nonverbal Behav, 16, 21–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott H.J. 2004. Music perception with cochlear implants: A review. Trends Amplif, 8, 49–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McKay C.M. & McDermott H.J. 1993. Perceptual performance of subjects with cochlear implants using the Spectral Maxima Sound Processor (SMSP) and the Mini Speech Processor (MSP). Ear Hear, 14, 350–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meister H., Landwehr M., Pyschny V., Walger M. & von Wedel H. 2009. The perception of prosody and speaker gender in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant recipients. Int J Audiol, 48, 38–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller J.D., Watson C.S., Kistler D.J., Wightman F.L. & Preminger J.E. 2008. Preliminary evaluation of the speech perception assessment and training system (SPATS) with hearing-aid and cochlear-implant users. Proc Meet Acoust, 2, 1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mok M., Grayden D., Dowell R.C. & Lawrence, D. 2006. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 49, 338–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. 2003. Coding of sounds in the auditory system and its relevance to signal processing and coding in cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol, 24, 243–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. & Carlyon R.P. 2005. Perception of pitch by people with cochlear hearing loss and by cochlear implant users. In: C.J. Plack., A.J. Oxenham., R.R. Fay & A.N. Popper (eds.), Pitch: Neural Coding and Perception. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 234–277.
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. & Glasberg B. 1988. Gap detection with sinusoids and noise in normal, impaired, and electrically stimulated ears. J Acous Soc Am, 83, 1093–1101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Most T. & Aviner C. 2009. Auditory, visual, and auditory-visual perception of emotions by individuals with cochlear implants, hearing aids, and normal hearing. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ, 14, 449–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Most T., Harel T., Shpak T. & Luntz M. 2011. Perception of suprasegmental speech features via bimodal stimulation: Cochlear implant on one ear and hearing aid on the other. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 54, 668–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Most T. & Peled M. 2007. Perception of suprasegmental features of speech by children with cochlear implants and children with hearing aids. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ, 12, 350–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray I.R. & Arnott J.L. 1993. Toward a simulation of emotion in synthetic speech: A review of the literature on human vocal emotion. J Acoust Soc Am, 93, 1097–1108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakata T., Trehub S.E. & Kanda Y. 2012. Effect of cochlear implants on children's perception and production of speech prosody. J Acoust Soc Am, 131, 1307–1314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxenham A.J. 2008. Pitch perception and auditory stream segregation: Implications for hearing loss and cochlear implants. Trends Amplif, 12(4), 316–331.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peng S.C., Tomblin J.B. & Turner C.W. 2008. Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing. Ear Hear, 29, 336–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peppé S. 1998. Investigating Linguistic Prosodic Ability in Adult Speakers of English. PhD thesis, University College London.
   Google Scholar
• Peretz I., Champod A.S. & Hyde K. 2003. Varieties of musical disorders: The Montreal battery of evaluation of amusia. New York Academy of Sciences, 999, 58–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinstein J.T., Wilson B.S., Finley C.C. & Abbas P.J. 1999. Pseudospontaneous activity: Stochastic independence of auditory nerve fibers with electrical stimulation. Hear Res, 127, 108–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saarni C. 1999. The Development of Emotional Competence. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saindon M.R. 2010. Music Processing in Deaf Adults with Cochlear Implants. Master's thesis. University of Toronto. Available: https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/25790/6/Saindon_Mathieu_R_201011_MA_thesis.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sammeth C.A., Bundy S.M. & Miller D.A. 2011. Bimodal hearing or bilateral cochlear implants: A review of the research literature. Semin Hear, 32, 3–31.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon R. 1993. Psychophysics. In: R.S. Tyler(ed.), Cochlear Implants: Audiological Foundations. San Diego: Singular Publishing, pp. 357–389.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner M.W., Clark G.M., Whitford L.A., Seligman P.M., Staller S.J. et al. 1994. Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 channel cochlear implant. Am J Otol, 15, 15–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skinner M.W., Holden L.K., Whitford L.A., Plant K.L., Psarros C. et al. 2002. Speech recognition with the Nucleus 24 SPEAK, ACE, and CIS speech coding strategies in newly implanted adults. Ear Hear, 23, 207–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith Z., Delgutte B. & Oxenham A.J. 2002. Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception. Nature, 416, 87–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straatman L.V., Rietveld A.C., Beijen J., Mylanus E.A. & Mens L.H. 2010. Advantage of bimodal fitting in prosody perception for children using a cochlear implant and a hearing aid. J Acoust Soc Am, 128, 1884–1895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torppa R., Faulkner A., Huotilainen M., Jarvikivi J., Lipsanen J. et al. 2014. The perception of prosody and associated auditory cues in early- implanted children: The role of auditory working memory and musical activities. Int J Audiol, 53, 182–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torppa R., Faulkner A., Jarvikivi J. & Vainio M. 2010. Acquisition of focus by normal hearing and cochlear-implanted children: The role of musical experience. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference of Speech Prosody, Chicago. Available: http://speechprosody2010.illinois.edu/papers/100977.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van Hoesel R.J.M. & Tyler R.S. 2003. Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implant. J Acoust Soc Am, 113, 1617–1630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandali A.E., Whitford L.A., Plant K.L. & Clark G.M. 2000. Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: Using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Ear Hear, 21, 608–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells B. & Peppe S. 2003. Intonational abilities of children with speech and language impairments. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 46, 5–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson B. 2000. Strategies for representing speech information with cochlear implants. In: J. Niparko, N.K. Meller, A. Robbins, D. Tucci & B. Wilson (eds.), Cochlear Implants: Principals and Practices. Philadelphia: Lippencott, Williams & Wilkins, pp. 129–170.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson B.L., Finley C.C., Lawson D.T., Wolford R.D., Eddington D.K. et al. 1991. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature, 352, 236–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson B.S., Finley C.C., Lawson D.T. & Zerbi M. 1997. Temporal representations with cochlear implants. Am J Otol, 8 (Suppl.), s30–34.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe J., Schafer E.C., Heldner B., Mülder H., Ward E. et al. 2009. Evaluation of speech recognition in noise with cochlear implants and dynamic FM. J Am Acad Audiol, 20, 409–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Won J.H., Drennan W.R., Nie K., Jameyson E.M. & Rubinstein J.T. 2011. Acoustic temporal modulation detection and speech perception in cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 130, 376–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright R. & Uchanski R.M. 2012. Music perception and appraisal: Cochlear implant users and simulated CI listening. J Am Acad Audiol, 23, 350–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng F-G. 2002. Temporal pitch in electric hearing. Hear Res, 174, 101–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng F-G. 2004. Trends in cochlear implants. Trends Amplif, 8, 1–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar