A process evaluation of implementing a vocational enablement protocol for employees with hearing difficulties in clinical practice

References

• Backenroth G.A.M., Wennberg A.F. & Klinteberg G. 2003. Personality and work life: A comparison between hearing-impaired persons and normal-hearing population. Social Behaviour and Personality, 31, 191–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chisolm T.H., Abrams H.B. & McArdle R. 2004. Short- and long-term outcomes of adult audiological rehabilitation. Ear Hear, 25, 464–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cima R.F., Maes I.H., Joore M.A., Scheyen D.J., El R.A. et al. 2012. Specialised treatment based on cognitive behaviour therapy versus usual care for tinnitus: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 379, 1951–1959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins M.P., Souza P.E., Liu C.F., Heagerty P.J., Amtmann D. et al. 2009. Hearing aid effectiveness after aural rehabilitation: Individual versus group (HEARING) trial: RCT design and baseline characteristics. BMC Health Serv Res, 9, 233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danermark B. 2005. A review of the psychosocial effects of hearing impairment in the working-age population. In: D. Stephens & L. Jones (eds.), The Impact of Genetic Hearing Impairment. 106–136.
   Google Scholar
• Danermark B. & Gellerstedt L.C. 2004. Psychosocial work environment, hearing impairment and health. Int J Audiol, 43, 383–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durlak J.A. & DuPre E.P. 2008. Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. Am J Community Psychol, 41, 327–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friberg E., Rosenhall U. & Alexanderson K. 2013. Sickness absence due to otoaudiological diagnoses: A descriptive nationwide study. BMC Public Health, 13, 635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getty L. & Hetu R. 1991. Development of a rehabilitation program for people affected with occupational hearing loss. 2. Results from group intervention with 48 workers and their spouses. Audiology, 30, 317–329.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glasgow R.E., Klesges L.M., Dzewaltowski D.A., Bull S.S. & Estabrooks P. 2004. The future of health behavior change research: What is needed to improve translation of research into health promotion practice? Ann Behav Med, 27, 3–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimby A. & Ringdahl A. 2000. Does having a job improve the quality of life among post-lingually deafened Swedish adults with severe-profound hearing impairment? Br J Audiol, 34, 187–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gussenhoven A.H.M., Anema J.R., Goverts S.T., Bosmans J.E., Festen J.M. et al. 2012. Cost-effectiveness of a vocational enablement protocol for employees with hearing impairment: Design of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health, 12, 151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gussenhoven A.H.M., Jansma E.P., Goverts S.T., Festen J.M., Anema J.R. et al. 2013. Vocational rehabilitation services for people with hearing difficulties: A systematic review of the literature. Work, 46, 151–164.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hickson L., Meyer C., Lovelock K., Lampert M. & Khan A. 2014. Factors associated with success with hearing aids in older adults. Int J Audiol, 53 Suppl. 1, S18–S27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen N.W., Kant I.J. & van den Brandt P.A. 2002. Need for recovery in the working population: Description and associations with fatigue and psychological distress. Int J Behav Med, 9, 322–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvelin M.R., Maki-Torkko E., Sorri M.J. & Rantakallio P.T. 1997. Effect of hearing impairment on educational outcomes and employment up to the age of 25 years, in northern Finland. Br J Audiol, 31, 165–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan-Neeman R., Muchnik C., Hildesheimer M. & Henkin Y. 2012. Hearing aid satisfaction and use in the advanced digital era. Laryngoscope, 122, 2029–2036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudsen L.V., Oberg M., Nielsen C., Naylor G. & Kramer S.E. 2010. Factors influencing help seeking, hearing-aid uptake, hearing-aid use, and satisfaction with hearing aids: A review of the literature. Trends Amplif, 14, 127–154.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kramer S.E., Kapteyn T.S. & Houtgast T. 2006a. Occupational performance: Comparing normally-hearing and hearing-impaired employees using the Amsterdam Checklist for Hearing and Work. Int J Audiol, 45, 503–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer S.E. 2006b. Hearing at Work: How do we Deal with That? CD-rom infomation package for professionals, patients, and significant others.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer S.E. 2008. Hearing impairment, work, and vocational enablement. Int J Audiol, 47 Suppl 2, S124–S130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer S.E., Allessie G.H., Dondorp A.W., Zekveld A.A. & Kapteyn T.S. 2005. A home education program for older adults with hearing impairment and their significant others: A randomized trial evaluating short- and long-term effects. Int J Audiol, 44, 255–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer S.E., Goverts S.T., van Til M.J. & Festen J.M. 2009. The challenge of aging in the workforce: Hearing impairment and vocational enablement. In: Hearing Care for Adults 2009; The Challenge of Aging. Phonak (ed.), 221–230.
   Google Scholar
• Lambeek L.C., van Mechelen W., Knol D.L., Loisel P. & Anema J.R. 2010. Randomised controlled trial of integrated care to reduce disability from chronic low back pain in working and private life. BMJ, 340, c1035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnan L. & Steckler A. 2002. Process evaluation for public health interventions and research: An overview. In:Process Evaluation for Public-health Interventions and Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod B., Upfold L. & Broadbent C. 2001. An investigation of the applicability of the inventory, satisfaction with amplification in daily life, at two weeks post hearing-aid fitting. Ear Hear, 22, 342–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murta S.G., Sanderson K. & Oldenburg B. 2007. Process evaluation in occupational stress management programs: A systematic review. Am J Health Promot, 21, 248–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachtegaal J., Festen J.M. & Kramer S.E. 2012. Hearing ability in working life and its relationship with sick leave and self-reported work productivity. Ear Hear, 33, 94–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachtegaal J., Kuik D.J., Anema J.R., Goverts S.T., Festen J.M. et al. 2009. Hearing status, need for recovery after work, and psychosocial work characteristics: Results from an internet-based national survey on hearing. Int J Audiol, 48, 684–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakley A., Strange V., Bonell C., Allen E. & Stephenson J. 2006. Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. BMJ, 332, 413–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oude Hengel K.M., Blatter B.M., van der Molen H.F., Joling C.I., Proper K.I. et al. 2011. Meeting the challenges of implementing an intervention to promote work ability and health-related quality of life at construction worksites: A process evaluation. J Occup Environ Med, 53, 1483–1491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope C. & Mays N. 1995. Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: An introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ, 311, 42–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preminger J.E. & Meeks S. 2010. Evaluation of an audiological rehabilitation program for spouses of people with hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol, 21, 315–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringdahl A. & Grimby A. 2000. Severe-profound hearing impairment and health-related quality of life among post-lingual deafened Swedish adults. Scand Audiol, 29, 266–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rychetnik L., Frommer M., Hawe P. & Shiell A. 2002. Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health, 56, 119–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders R.P., Evans M.H., & Joshi P. 2005. Developing a process- evaluation plan for assessing health promotion program implementation: A how-to guide. Health Promot Pract, 6, 134–147.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schuman H. & Presser S. 1979. The open and closed question. American Sociological Review, 44, 692–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw L., Jennings M.B. & Kramer S.E. 2013a. Work transition tips: Inclusion for workers with hearing loss: Actions for work practice professionals. Work, 46, 205–206.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shaw L., Tetlaff B., Jennings M.B. & Southall K.E. 2013b. The standpoint of persons with hearing loss on work disparities and workplace accommodations. Work, 46, 193–204.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strijk J.E., Proper K.I., van der Beek A.J. & van Mechelen W. 2011. A process evaluation of a worksite vitality intervention among ageing hospital workers. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, 8, 58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thodi C., Parazzini M., Kramer S.E., Davis A., Stenfelt S. et al. 2013. Adult hearing screening: follow-up and outcomes. Am J Audiol, 22, 183–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gils R.F., Groenewoud K., Boot C.R., Rustemeyer T., van Mechelen W. et al. 2012. Process evaluation of an integrated, multidisciplinary intervention programme for hand eczema. Contact Dermatitis, 66, 254–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeek J.H., de Boer A.G., van der Weide W.E., Piirainen H., Anema J.R. et al. 2005. Patient satisfaction with occupational health physicians, development of a questionnaire. Occup Environ Med, 62, 119–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yueh B., Collins M.P., Souza P.E., Boyko E.J., Loovis C.F. et al. 2010. Long-term effectiveness of screening for hearing loss: The screening for auditory impairment - Which hearing assessment test (SAI-WHAT) randomized trial. J Am Geriatr Soc, 8, 427–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar