Hearing threshold levels for an otologically screened population in Spain

References

• Agrawal Y., Platz E.A. & Niparko J.K. 2008. Prevalence of hearing loss and differences by demographic characteristics among US adults. Arch Intern Med, 168, 1522–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen P.D. & Eddins D.A. 2010. Presbycusis phenotypes form a heterogeneous continuum when ordered by degree and configuration of hearing loss. Hear Res, 264, 10–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 1994. Guidelines for the audiologic management of individuals receiving cochleotoxic drug therapy. ASHA, 36, 11–19.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchet C., Pommie C. & Mondain M. et al. 2008. Pure-tone threshold description of an elderly French screened population. Otol Neurotol, 29, 432–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burén M., Solem B.S. & Laukli E. 1992. Threshold of hearing (0.125–20 kHz) in children and youngsters. Br J Audiol, 26, 23–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clark J.G. 1981. Uses and abuses of hearing loss classification. ASHA, 23, 493–500.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Corso J.F. 1963. Age and sex differences in pure-tone thresholds. Survey of hearing levels from 18 to 65 years. Arch Otolaryngol, 77, 385–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Seta E., Bertoli G.A. & Filipo R. 1985. High-frequency audiometry above 8 kHz. Comparative results of normative thresholds obtained with a headphone system and a quasi-free-field system. Audiology, 24, 254–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engdahl B., Tambs K., Borchgrevink H.M. et al. 2005. Screened and unscreened hearing threshold levels for the adult population: Results from the Nord-Trøndelag Hearing Loss Study. Int J Audiol, 44, 213–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EU Work Group on Genetics of Hearing Impairment (A. Martini, ed.). 1996. European Commission Directorate, Biomedical and Health Research Programme Hereditary Deafness, Epidemiology and Clinical Research (HEAR). Infoletter.
   Google Scholar
• Fausti S.A., Erickson D.A., Frey R.H. et al. 1981. The effects of noise upon human hearing sensitivity from 8 to 20 kHz. J Acoust Soc Am, 69, 1343–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glorig A. & Nixon J. 1962. Hearing loss as a function of age. Laryngoscope, 72, 1596–610.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goycoolea M.V., Goycoolea H.G. & Farfan C.R. et al. 1986. Effect of life in industrialized societies on hearing in natives of Easter Island. Laryngoscope, 96, 1391–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green D.M., Kidd Jr. G. & Stevens K.N. 1987. High-frequency audiometric assessment of a young adult population. J Acoust Soc Am, 81, 485–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinchcliffe R. 1959. The threshold of hearing as a function of age. Acustica, 9, 303–308.
   Google Scholar
• Hinchcliffe R. & Jones W.I. 1968. Hearing level of a suburban Jamaican population. Int Audiol, 7, 239–258.
   Google Scholar
• International Electrotechnical Commission. 2001. Electroacoustics. Audiological equipment - Part 1: Pure-tone audiometers. IEC 60645-1. Geneva: IEC.
   Google Scholar
• International Electrotechnical Commission. 2009. Electroacoustics - Simulators of human head and ear - Part 1: Ear Simulator for the Calibration of Supra-aural Earphones. IEC 60318-1. Geneva: IEC.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. 1987. Acoustics. Normal Equal-Loudness-level Contours. ISO 226. Geneva: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. 1998. Acoustics. Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment. Part 1: Reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for pure tones and supra-aural earphones. ISO 389-1. Geneva: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. 2000. Acoustics. Statistical distribution of hearing thresholds as a function of age. ISO 7029. Geneva: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. 2003. Acoustics. Normal Equal-Loudness-level Contours. ISO 226. Geneva: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. 2009. Acoustics. Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment - Part 9: Preferred test conditions for the determination of reference hearing threshold levels. ISO 389-9. Geneva: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. 2010. Acoustics. Audiometric test methods - Part 1: Pure-tone air and bone conduction audiometry. ISO 8253-1. Geneva: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• Jatho K. & Heck K.H. 1959. Audiometric threshold studies on progression and characteristics of presbycusis in various stages of life; with a contribution to the pathogenesis of presbycusis. Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol, 38, 72–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johansson M.S.K. & Arlinger S.D. 2002. Hearing threshold levels for an ontologically unscreened, non-occupationally noise-exposed population in Sweden. Int J Audiol, 41, 180–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kell R.L., Pearson J.C.G. & Taylor W. 1970. Hearing thresholds of an island population in north Scotland. Int Audiol, 9, 334–349.
   Google Scholar
• Lee J., Dhar S., Abel R. et al. 2012. Behavioral hearing thresholds between 0.125 and 20 kHz using depth-compensated ear simulator calibration. Ear Hear, 3, 315–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutman M.E. & Davis A.C. 1994. The distribution of hearing threshold levels in the general population aged 18–30 years. Audiology, 33, 327–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Osterhammel D. & Osterhammel P. 1979. High-frequency audiometry: Age and sex variations. Scand Audiol, 8, 73–81.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pearson J.D., Morrell C.H., Gordon-Salant S. et al. 1995. Gender differences in a longitudinal study of age-associated hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am, 97, 1196–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuter W., Schonfeld U., Mansmann U. et al. 1998. Extended high frequency audiometry in pre-school children. Audiology, 37, 285–94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robinson D.W. & Dadson R.S. 1956. A re-determination of the equal-loudness relations for pure tones. Br J Appl Phys, 7, 166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson D.W. & Sutton G.J. 1978. A comparative analysis of data on the relation of pure-tone audiometric thresholds to age. NPL Acoustic report Ac84.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson D.W. & Sutton G.J. 1979. Age effect in hearing: A comparative analysis of published threshold data. Audiology, 18, 320–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roche A.F., Siervogel R.M., Himes J.H. et al. 1976. Longitudinal study of human hearing: Its relationship to noise and other factors. AMRL-TR-76-110.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez Valiente A., Trinidad A., García Berrocal J.R. et al. 2014. Extended high-frequency (9–20 kHz) audiometry reference thresholds in 645 healthy subjects. Int J Audiol, 53, 531–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez Valiente A., García Berrocal J.R., Roldán Fidalgo A. et al. 2014. Earphones in extended high-frequency audiometry and ISO 389-5. Int J Audiol, 53, 595–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen S., Bergman M., Plester D. et al. 1962. Presbycusis study of a relatively noise-free population in the Sudan. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 71, 727–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen S., Plester D., El-Mofty A. et al. 1964. High frequency audiometry in presbycusis. Arch Otolaryngol, 79, 18–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenhall U., Pedersen K., Svanborg A. 1990. Presbycusis and noise-induced hearing loss. Ear Hear, 11, 257–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth T.N., Hanebuth D. & Probst R. 2011. Prevalence of age-related hearing loss in Europe: A review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 268, 1101–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schechter M.A., Fausti S.A. & Rappaport B.Z. et al. 1986. Age categorization of high-frequency auditory threshold data. J Acoust Soc Am, 79, 767–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spoor A. 1967. Presbycusis values in relation to noise-induced hearing loss. Int Audiol, 6, 48–57.
   Google Scholar
• Stelmachowicz P.G., Beauchaine K.A., Kalberer A. et al. 1989. Normative thresholds in the 8- to 20-kHz range as a function of age. J Acoust Soc Am, 86, 1384–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenklev N.C. & Laukli E. 2004. Presbycusis-hearing thresholds and ISO 7029. Int J Audiol, 43, 295–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor W., Pearson J. & Nair A. 1967. Hearing thresholds of a non-noise-exposed population in Dundee. Br J Ind Med, 24, 114–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wiley T.L., Cruickshanks K.J., Nondahl D.M. et al. 1998. Aging and high-frequency hearing sensitivity. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 41, 1061–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley T.L., Torre P., Cruickshanks K.J. et al. 2001. Hearing sensitivity in adults screened for selected risk factors. J Am Acad Audiol, 12, 337–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization. 1991. Report of the Informal Working Group on Prevention of Deafness and Hearing Impairment Programme Planning. Geneva.
   Google Scholar