International Collegium of Rehabilitative Audiology (ICRA) recommendations for the construction of multilingual speech tests

References

• Bench J., Kowal Å. & Bamford J. 1979. The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children. Br J Audiol, 13(3), 108–112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brand T. & Kollmeier B. 2002. Efficient adaptive procedures for threshold and concurrent slope estimates for psychophysics and speech intelligibility tests, J Acoust Soc Am, 111, 2801–2810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagerman B. 1982. Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. Scand Audiol, 11, 79–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagerman B. 1984. Clinical measurements of speech reception threshold in noise. Scand Audiol, 13, 57–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagerman B. & Kinnefors C. 1995. Efficient adaptive methods for measuring speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. Scand Audiol, 24, 71–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochmuth S., Jürgens T., Brand T. & Kollmeier B. 2015. Influence of noise type on speech reception thresholds across four languages measured with matrix sentence tests. Int J Audiol, submitted.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO 8253-3. 2012. Acoustics - Audiometric test methods - Part 3: Speech audiometry. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen S., Luts H., Dejonckere P., Van Wieringen A. & Wouters J. 2013. Efficient hearing screening in noise-exposed listeners using the Digit Triplet test. Ear Hear, 34(6), 773–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen S., Luts H., Wagener K.C., Frachet B. & Wouters J. 2010. The French digit triplet test: A hearing screening tool for speech intelligibility in noise. Int J Audiol, 49, 378–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmeier B. 1990. Messmethodik, Modellierung und Verbesserung der Verständlichkeit von Sprache (in German). (Methodology, modeling, and improvement of speech intelligibility measurements). Habilitation, Universität Göttingen, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Kollmeier B., Warzybok A., Hochmuth S., Zokoll M., Uslar V. et al. 2015. The multilingual matrix test: Principles, applications and comparison across languages: A review. Int J Audiol. online first, http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2015.1020971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmeier B. & Wesselkamp M. 1997. Development and evaluation of a German sentence test for objective and subjective speech intelligibility assessment. J Acoust Soc Am, 102(4), 2412–2421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacPherson A. & Akeroyd M.A. 2014. Variations in the slope of the psychometric functions for speech intelligibility: A systematic survey. Trends Hear, 18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann K., Baumeister N., Baumann U., Sick U., Euler H.A. et al. 2012. Speech audiometry in quiet with the Oldenburg Sentence Test for Children. Int J Audiol, 51(3), 157–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp R. & Mimpen A.M. 1979. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiol, 18(1), 43–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Risberg A. 1976. Diagnostic rhyme test for speech audiometry with severely hard of hearing and profoundly deaf children. Speech Transmission Laboratory Quarterly Progress and Status Report, 2, 3, 40–55.
   Google Scholar
• Smits C. & Houtgast T. 2006. Measurements and calculations on the simple up-down adaptive procedure for speech-in-noise tests. J Acoust Soc Am, 120, 1608–1621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits C., Kapteyn T.S. & Houtgast T. 2004. Development and validation of an automatic speech-in-noise screening test by telephone. Int J Audiol, 43(1), 15–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soli S.D. & Wong L.L.N. 2008. Assessment of speech intelligibility in noise with the Hearing in Noise Test. Int J Audiol, 47, 356–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotscheck J. 1985. Sprachverständlichkeit bei additiven Störungen. Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 57(4–5), 257–267.
   Google Scholar
• Voiers W.D. 1983. Evaluating processed speech using the diagnostic rhyme test. Speech Technology, 1(4), 30–39.
   Google Scholar
• von Wallenberg E.L. & Kollmeier B. 1989. Sprachverständlichkeitsmessungen für die Audiologie mit einem Reimtest in deutscher Sprache: Erstellung und Evaluation von Testlisten. Audiol Akustik, 28, 50–65.
   Google Scholar
• Wagener K. & Kollmeier B. 2005. Evaluation des Oldenburger Satztests mit Kindern und Oldenburger Kinder-Satztest. Z Audiol, 44(3), 134–143.
   Google Scholar
• Wagener K., Brand T. & Kollmeier B. 1999a. Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests in deutscher Sprache Teil II: Optimierung des Oldenburger Satztests (in German). (Development and evaluation of a German sentence test - Part II: Optimization of the Oldenburg sentence tests). Z Audiol, 38, 44–56.
   Google Scholar
• Wagener K., Brand T. & Kollmeier B. 1999b. Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests für die deutsche Sprache Teil III: Evaluation des Oldenburger Satztests (in German). (Development and evaluation of a German sentence test - Part III: Evaluation of the Oldenburg sentence test). Z Audiol, 38, 86–95.
   Google Scholar
• Wagener K., Kühnel V. & Kollmeier B. 1999c. Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests in deutscher Sprache I: Design des Oldenburger Satztests (in German). (Development and evaluation of a German sentence test - Part I: Design of the Oldenburg sentence test). Z Audiol, 38, 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Wichmann F.A. & Hill N.J. 2001a. The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Percept Psychophys, 63, 1293–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wichmann F.A. & Hill N.J. 2001b. The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling. Percept Psychophys, 63, 1314–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zokoll M., Wagener K.C., Brand T., Buschermöhle M. & Kollmeier B. 2012. Internationally comparable screening tests for listening in noise in several European languages: The German digit triplet test as an optimization prototype. Int J Audiol, 51, 697–707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zokoll M.A., Hochmuth S., Warzybok A., Wagener K.C., Buschermöhle M. et al. 2013. Speech-in-noise tests for multilingual hearing screening and diagnostics. Am J Audiol, 22(1), 175–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar