Motion sickness and sopite syndrome associated with parabolic flights: a case report

References

• Clément G. & Ngo-Anh J.T. 2013. Space physiology II: Adaptation of the central nervous system to space flight-past, current, and future studies. Eur J Appl Physiol, 113, 1655–1672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demertzi A., Van Ombergen A., Tomilovskaya E.S., Jeurissen B., Pechenkova E., Di Perri C. et al. 2015. Cortical reorganization in an astronaut’s brain after long-duration spaceflight (in press). Brain Struct. Funct.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gianaros P. & Muth E. 2001. A questionnaire for the assessment of the multiple dimensions of motion sickness. Aviat Space Environ Med 72, 115–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golding J.F. 2006. Motion sickness susceptibility. Auton Neurosci Basic Clin, 129, 67–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graybiel A. & Knepton J. 1976. Sopite syndrome: a sometimes sole manifestation of motion sickness. Aviat Space Environ Med 47, 873–882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harm D.L. & Schlegel T.T. 2002. Predicting motion sickness during parabolic flight. Auton Neurosci Basic Clin, 97, 116–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hettinger L.J., Berbaum K.S., Kennedy R.S., Dunlap W.P. & Nolan M.D. 1990. Vection and simulator sickness. Mil Psychol, 2, 171–181.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hilbig R., Anken R.H., Bauerle A. & Rahmann H. et al. 2002. Susceptibility to motion sickness in fish: a parabolic aircraft flight study. J Gravit Physiol, 9, 29–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johns M.W. 1991. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep, 14, 540–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy R., Stanney K., & Lawson B. 1998. Independence of different cybersickness aftereffects: basis for a theory. Aviat Sp Env Med, 43, 181–192.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy R.S., Drexler J., & Kennedy R.C. 2010. Research in visually induced motion sickness. Appl Ergon, 41, 494–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiniorski E.T., Weider SK., Finley J.R., Fitzgerald E.M., Howard JC., Di Nardo P.A. et al. 2004. Sopite symptoms in the optokinetic drum. Aviat Space Environ Med, 75, 872–875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lackner J.R. 2014. Motion sickness: More than nausea and vomiting. Exp Brain Res, 232, 2493–2510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lackner J.R. & DiZio P. 2006. Space motion sickness. Exp Brain Res, 175, 377–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson B.D. & Mead A.M. 1998. The sopite syndrome revisited: Drowsiness and mood changes during real or apparent motion. Acta Astronaut, 43, 181–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsangas P., Johnston J., McCauley M.E. & Miller NL. 2010. Personnel physical activity levels on naval vessels – evidence for soporific and fatigue effects? In Proceedings of the International Conference of Human Performance at Sea (HPAS).
   Google Scholar
• Matsangas P. & McCauley M. 2014a. Sopite syndrome: a revised definition. Aviat Space Environ Med , 85, 672–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsangas P. & McCauley M. 2014b. Yawning as a behavioral marker of mild motion sickness and sopite syndrome. . Aviat Space Environ Med, 85, 658–661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsangas P., McCauley M., & Becker W. 2014. The effect of mild motion sickness and sopite syndrome on multitasking cognitive performance. Hum. Factors, 75, 872–875.
   Google Scholar
• McMaster S.B. & Carney J.M. 1985. Changes in drug sensitivity following acute and chronic exercise. Pharmacol Biochem Behav, 23, 191–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller E.F. & Graybiel A. 1970. A provocative test for grading susceptibility to motion sickness yielding a single numerical score. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl, 274, 1–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Ombergen A., Jeurissen B., Demertzi A., Heine L., Sinitsyn V, Mershina E. et al. 2013. Neuroplasticity in astronauts and patients with vestibular lesions studied with novel MRI methods: proof of concept. In 19th IAA Humans in Space: linking the challanges of space exploration with medicine on Earth. Cologne, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Price N.M., Schmitt L.G., McGuire J., Shaw J.E. & Trobough G. 1981. Transdermal scopolamine in the prevention of motion sickness at sea. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 29, 414–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlegel T.T., Brown T.E., Wood S.J., Benavides E.W., Bondar R.L., Stein F. et al. 2001. Orthostatic intolerance and motion sickness after parabolic flight. J Appl Physiol, 90, 67–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmäl F. 2013. Neuronal mechanisms and the treatment of motion sickness. Pharmacology, 91, 229–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons R.G., Phillips J.B., Lojewski RA., Wang Z., Boyd J.L., Putcha L. 2010. The efficacy of low-dose intranasal scopolamine for motion sickness. Aviat Space Environ Med, 81, 405–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strewe C., Feuerecker M., Nichiporuk I., Kaufmann I., Hauer D., Morukov B. et al. 2012. Effects of parabolic flight and spaceflight on the endocannabinoid system in humans. Rev Neurosci, 23, 673–680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suri K.B., Crampton G.H., & Daunton N.G. 1979. Motion sickness in cats: A symptom rating scale used in laboratory and flight tests. Aviat Space Environ Med, 50, 614–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson D., Clark L.A. & Tellegen A. 1988. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol, 54, 1063–1070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerts A.P., Pattyn N., Putcha L., Hoag S.W., Van Ombergen A., Hallgren E. et al. 2015. Restricted sedation and absence of cognitive impairments after administration of intranasal scopolamine. J Appl Physiol, 119, 213–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood C.D., Manno J.E., Manno BR., Redetzki H.M., Wood M., Vekovius W.A. 1984. Side effects of antimotion sickness drugs. Aviat Space Environ Med, 55, 113–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar