Emerging technologies with potential for objectively evaluating speech recognition skills

References

• Anderson S., Parbery-Clark A., White-Schwoch T. & Kraus N. 2013. Auditory brainstem response to complex sounds predicts self-reported speech-in-noise performance. J Speech, Lang, and Hear Res, 56, 31–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bankowski, E., Meitzler, T., Zielinski, S., Slavin, A. & Tiberkevich, V. 2011. Antenna Development for Multifunctional Armor Applications Using Embedded spin-Torque nano-Oscillator (STNO) as a Microwave Detector (No. TARDEC-21952). Army Tank Automative Research Development and Enginnering Center Warren, MI, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Bramhall N., Ong B., Ko J. & Parker M. 2015. Speech Perception Ability in Noise is Correlated with Auditory Brainstem Response Wave I Amplitude. J Am Acad Audiol, 26, 509–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan A.M., Halgren E., Marinkovic K. & Cash S.S. 2011. Decoding word and category-specific spatiotemporal representations from MEG and EEG. Neuroimage, 54, 3028–3039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang E.F., Rieger J.W., Johnson K., Berger M.S., Barbaro N.M. et al. 2010. Categorical speech representation in human superior temporal gyrus. Nat Neurosci, 13, 1428–1432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi Y.M., Wang Y.T., Wang Y., Maier C., Jung T.P. et al. 2012. Dry and noncontact EEG sensors for mobile brain–computer interfaces. Neural Syst Rehab Eng IEEE Trans, 20, 228–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, Y.M., Wang, Y., Wang, Y.T., Jung, T.P., Kerth, T. et al. 2013. A practical mobile dry EEG system for human computer interfaces. In: D.D. Schmorrow, & C.M. Fidopiastis (eds.) Foundations of Augmented Cognition. Springer: Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 649–655
   Google Scholar
• Chizeck, H.J. & Bonaci, T. 2014. U.S. Patent Application 14/174,818.
   Google Scholar
• Correia, J. M., Jansma, B., Hausfeld, L., Kikkert, S., & Bonte, M. 2015. EEG decoding of spoken words in bilingual listeners: from words to language invariant semantic-conceptual representations. Frontier Psych, 6. http://www.cognionics.com/index.php/products/hd-eeg-systems/64-channel-system Viewed online on Oct 20, 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denning T., Matsuoka Y. & Kohno T. 2009. Neurosecurity: security and privacy for neural devices. Neurosurg Focus, 27, E7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Veterans Affairs. 1999. Schedule for rating disabilities; Diseases of the ear and other sense Organs. 38 CFR Part 4 RIN 2900 -AF22, Final rule. Federal Register Tuesday May 11, 1999; 64(90): 25202–25209.
   Google Scholar
• Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA): Department of Defense Fiscal Year 2010 Budget Estimates. Washington, DC: Department of Defense, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Fan J.A., Yeo W.H., Su Y., Hattori Y., Lee W. et al. 2014. Fractal design concepts for stretchable electronics. Nat Commun, 5, 3266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farahany, N.A. 2012. Incriminating thoughts. Stanford Law Rev, 64, 351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, M., Hwu, T., Jain, S., Knight, R., Martinovic, I. et al. 2013. Subliminal Probing for Private Information via EEG-Based BCI Devices. arXiv Preprint arXiv, 1312, 6052
   Google Scholar
• Fuente A., Mcpherson B. & Hickson L. 2013. Auditory dysfunction associated with solvent exposure. BMC Public Health, 13, 39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujihira H. & Shiraishi K. 2015. Correlations between word intelligibility under reverberation and speech auditory brainstem responses in elderly listeners. Clinl Neurophysiol, 126, 96–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallun F.J., Diedesch A.C., Kubli L.R., Walden T.C., Folmer R.L. et al. 2012. Performance on tests of central auditory processing by individuals exposed to high-intensity blasts. J Rehab Res Dev., 49, 1005–1025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guenther F.H., Brumberg J.S., Wright E.J., Nieto-Castanon A., Tourville J.A. et al. 2009. A wireless brain-machine interface for real-time speech synthesis. PLoS One, 4, e8218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimaraes M.P., Wong D.K., Uy E.T., Grosenick L. & Suppes P. 2007. Single-trial classification of MEG recordings. Biomed Eng IEEE Trans, 54, 436–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurgel R.K., Jackler R.K., Dobie R.A. & Popelka G.R. 2012. A new standardized format for reporting hearing outcome in clinical trials. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 147, 803–807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herff C., Heger D., De_Pesters A., Telaar D., Brunner P. et al. 2015. Brain-to-text: Decoding spoken phrases from phone representations in the brain. Front Neuroeng, 8, 217 article 12 pages.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong J.W., Kim M.K., Cheng H., Yeo W.H., Huang X. et al. 2014. Capacitive Epidermal Electronics for Electrically Safe, Long‐Term Electrophysiological Measurements. Adv Healthcare Mater, 3, 642–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong J.W., Shin G., Park S.I., Yu K.J., Xu L. et al. 2015. Soft Materials in Neuroengineering for Hard Problems in Neuroscience. Neuron, 86, 175–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson A.C., Morata T.C., Lindblad A.C., Nylén P.R., Svensson E.B. et al. 2006. Audiological findings in workers exposed to styrene alone or in concert with noise. Noise Health, 8, 45–57.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kamada K., Sato D., Ito Y., Natsukawa H., Okano K. et al. 2015. Human magnetoencephalogram measurements using newly developed compact module of high-sensitivity atomic magnetometer. Jap J Appl Physics, 54, 026601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim D.-H., Lu N., Ma R., Kim Y.-S., Kim R.H. et al. 2011. Epidermal electronics. Science (New York, N.Y.), 333, 838–843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitching, J., Knappe, S., Shah, V., Schwindt, P., Griffith, C. et al. 2008. Microfabricated atomic magnetometers and applications. In Frequency Control Symposium, 2008 IEEE International (pp. 789–794). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Kohonen T. 1988. The ‘neural' phonetic typewriter. Computer, 21, 11–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohonen T. 2006. Self-organizing neural projections. Neural Netw, 19, 723–733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskinen M., Viinikanoja J., Kurimo M., Klami A., Kaski S. et al. 2013. Identifying fragments of natural speech from the listener's MEG signals. Hum Brain Mapp, 34, 1477–1489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kujawa S.G. & Liberman M.C. 2009. Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after “temporary” noise-induced hearing loss. J Neurosci, 29, 14077–14085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kujawa S.G. & Liberman M.C. 2015. Synaptopathy in the noise-exposed and aging cochlea: Primary neural degeneration in acquired sensorineural hearing loss. Hear Res, in press 330, Part B, 191–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.P.C.G Lobarinas E. (2015). Strategies for assessing antioxidant efficacy in clinical trials. In: J.M. Miller, C.G. Le Prell & L.P. Rybak (eds.) Oxidative Stress in Applied Basic Research and Clinical Practice: Free Radicals in ENT Pathology. New York: Humana Press, pp. 163–192.
   Google Scholar
• Levy B.R., Pilver C., Chung P.H. & Slade M.D. 2014. Subliminal strengthening: Improving older individuals’ physical function over time with an implicit-age-stereotype intervention. Psychol Sci, 25, 2127–2135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo H. & Poeppel D. 2007. Phase patterns of neuronal responses reliably discriminate speech in human auditory cortex. Neuron, 54, 1001–1010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macrae, J.H. 1991. A Procedure for Determining Percentage Loss of Hearing of Clients with Abnormally Poor Speech Discrimination. National Acoustic Laboratories Report No. 124. Canberra, Australia: Department of Community Services and Health, Australian Government Publishing Service
   Google Scholar
• Malech, R.G. 1976. U.S. Patent No. 3,951,134. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
   Google Scholar
• Mardirossian, A. 2000. Communication system and method including brain wave analysis and/or use of brain activity. U.S. Patent No. 6,011,991. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
   Google Scholar
• Martin S., Brunner P., Holdgraf C., Heinze H.J., Crone N.E. et al. 2014. Decoding spectrotemporal features of overt and covert speech from the human cortex. Front Neuroeng, 7, 14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martinovic, I., Davies, D., Frank, M., Perito, D., Ros, T. et al. 2012. On the Feasibility of Side-Channel Attacks with Brain-Computer Interfaces. In USENIX Security Symposium (pp. 143–158).
   Google Scholar
• Mesgarani N., Cheung C., Johnson K. & Chang E.F. 2014. Phonetic feature encoding in human superior temporal gyrus. Science, 343, 1006–1010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morata T.C. & Johnson A.C. 2012. Effects of exposure to chemicals on noise-induced hearing loss. In: C.G. Le Prell, D. Henderson, R.R. Fay & A.N. Popper (eds.) Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: Scientific Advances, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research. New York: Springer Science + Business Media, LLC, pp. 223–254.
   Google Scholar
• Norton J.J., Lee D.S., Lee J.W., Lee W., Kwon O. et al. 2015. Soft, curved electrode systems capable of integration on the auricle as a persistent brain–computer interface. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 112, 3920–3925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasley B.N., David S.V., Mesgarani N., Flinker A., Shamma S.A. et al. 2012. Reconstructing Speech from Human Auditory Cortex. PLoS Biol, 10, e1001251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, A.J. & Goswami, I. 2013. Stimulus reconstruction using EEG reveals impaired low frequency speech envelope encoding (< 8 Hz) in developmental dyslexia. Neuroscience 2013 Nov 9-13, San Diego, California. (Poster number 533.01/S7).
   Google Scholar
• Rawool V.W. 1989. Speech recognition scores and ABR in cochlear impairment. Scand Audiol, 18, 113–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawool V.W. 2012. Workers’ compensation for noise-induced hearing loss and forensic audiology. In: Rawool (ed.) Hearing Conservation: In Occupational, Recreational, Educational, and Home Settings. New York: Thieme, pp. 242–265.
   Google Scholar
• Rawool V.W. 2015. Future Trends in Objective Evaluation of Auditory Processing of Speech Stimuli. Audiol Today, 27, 22–29.
   Google Scholar
• Rawool V.W. 2016a. Auditory processing deficits due to exposure to ototoxins In Rawool (ed.). Auditory Processing Deficits: Assessment and Intervention. New York: Thieme, pp. 429–455.
   Google Scholar
• Rawool V.W. 2016b. Assessment of the processing of monaural low-redundancy speech. In: Rawool (ed.). Auditory Processing Deficits: Assessment and Intervention. New York: Thieme, pp. 201–224.
   Google Scholar
• Rawool V.W. 2016c. Screening and diagnostic procedures and considerations. In: Rawool (ed.). Auditory Processing Deficits: Assessment and Intervention. New York: Thieme, pp. 85–120.
   Google Scholar
• Rawool V.W. 2016d. Assessing and documenting peripheral auditory status. In: Rawool (ed.). Auditory Processing Deficits: Assessment and Intervention. New York: Thieme, pp. 43–83.
   Google Scholar
• Sander T.H., Preusser J., Mhaskar R., Kitching J., Trahms L. et al. 2012. Magnetoencephalography with a chip-scale atomic magnetometer. Biomed Opt Exp, 3, 981–990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah V.K. & Wakai R.T. 2013. A compact, high performance atomic magnetometer for biomedical applications. Phys Med Biol, 58, 8153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro B. & Waks E. 2014. BRAIN EAGER: Wireless measurement of neuronal currents using spin- torque nano oscillators. https://www.collectiveip.com/grants/NSF:1450921
   Google Scholar
• Soman S. & Murthy B.K. 2015. Using Brain Computer Interface for Synthesized Speech Communication for the Physically Disabled. Proc Comput Sci, 46, 292–298.
   Google Scholar
• Suppes P., Han B. & Lu Z.L. 1998. Brain-wave recognition of sentences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA , 95, 15861–15866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suppes P., Han B., Epelboim J. & Lu Z.L. 1999. Invariance between subjects of brain wave representations of language. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 96, 12953–12958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suppes P., Lu Z.L. & Han B. 1997. Brain wave recognition of words. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA , 94, 14965–14969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suppes P., Perreau-Guimaraes M. & Wong D.K. 2009. Partial orders of similarity differences invariant between EEG-recorded brain and perceptual representations of language. Neural Comput, 21, 3228–3269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardlaw J.M., Davies H., Booth T.C., Laurie G., Compston A. et al. 2015. Acting on incidental findings in research imaging. BMJ, 351, h5190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberg I.N., Waks, E. & Shapiro, B. 2015. Neuroparticle with a spin-torque device. U.S. Patent No. 2015/0238110. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
   Google Scholar
• Wickenden A.E., Fazi, C., Huebschman, B., Kaul, R., Perrella, A.C. et al. 2009. Spin torque nano oscillators as potential terahertz (thz) communications devices (No. ARL-TR-4807). Army Research Lab Adelphi MD Sensors and Electron Devices Directorate,
   Google Scholar
• Wu Q.Z., Li D.M., Kuang W.H., Zhang T.J., Lui S. et al. 2011. Abnormal regional spontaneous neural activity in treatment‐refractory depression revealed by resting‐state fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp, 32, 1290–1299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang M., Sheth S.A., Schevon C.A., II, G.M.M. & Mesgarani N. 2015. Speech reconstruction from human auditory cortex with deep neural networks. In Sixteenth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association. 06–10 September 2015/Germany, Dresden.
   Google Scholar