Study of the frequency parameters of EEG influenced by zone-dependent local ELF-MF exposure on the human head

References

• Bell G., Marino A., Chesson A., Struve F.. Electrical states in the rabbit brain can be altered by light and electromagnetic fields. Brain Res.. 1992a; 570 1–2: 307–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell G. B., Marino A. A., Chesson A. L.. Alterations in brain electrical activity caused by magnetic fields: Detecting the detection process. Electroencephalog. Clin. Neurophysiol.. 1992b; 83 6: 389–397.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bell G. B., Marino A. A., Chesson A. L.. Frequency-specific blocking in the human brain caused by electromagnetic fields. NeuroReport.. 1994a; 5 4: 510–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell G. B., Marino A. A., Chesson A. L.. Frequency-specific responses in the human brain caused by electromagnetic fields. J. Neurolog. Sci.. 1994b; 123 1–2: 26–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belova N. A., Ermakova O. N., Ermakov A. M., . 2007. The bioeffects of extremely weak power-frequency alternating magnetic fields. Environmentalist.. 27 4: 411–416.
   Google Scholar
• Blackman C. F., Benane S. G., House D. E.. 2001. The influence of 1.2 μT, 60 Hz magnetic fields on melatonin- and tamoxifen-induced inhibition of MCF-7 cell growth. Bioelectromagnetics.. 22 2: 122–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budzynski T.. 2009. Introduction to Quantitative EEG and Neurofeedback: Advanced Theory and Applications. Amsterdam, Boston: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Cook C. M., Saucier D. M., Thomas A. W., Prato F. S.. 2009. Changes in human EEG alpha activity following exposure to two different pulsed magnetic field sequences. Bioelectromagnetics.. 30 1: 9–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook C. M., Thomas A. W., Prato F. S.. 2004. Resting EEG Is affected by exposure to a pulsed ELF magnetic field. Bioelectromagnetics.. 25 3: 196–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cvetkovic D., Cosic I.. 2006. Automated ELF magnetic field stimulation of the human EEG activity. Int. Comp. Aided Eng.. 13 4: 313–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cvetkovic D., Cosic I.. 2009. Alterations of human electroencephalographic activity caused by multiple extremely low frequency magnetic field exposures. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput.. 47 10: 1063–1073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghione S., Del Seppia C., Mezzasalma L., Bonfiglio L.. 2005. Effects of 50 Hz electromagnetic fields on electroencephalographic alpha activity, dental pain threshold and cardiovascular parameters in humans. Neurosci. Lett.. 382 1–2: 112–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham C., Cook M. R.. 1999. Human sleep in 60 Hz magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics.. 20 5: 277–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunkelman J. D., Johnstone J.. 2005. Neurofeedback and the brain. J. Adult Develop.. 12 2–3: 93–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurgul S., Erdal N., Yilmaz S. N., . 2008. Deterioration of bone quality by long-term magnetic field with extremely low frequency in rats. Bone.. 42 1: 74–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyton A. C., Hall J. E.. 2000. Textbook of Medical Physiology. Philadelphia: Saunders.
   Google Scholar
• Hale T. S., Smalley S. L., Hanada G., . 2009. Atypical alpha asymmetry in adults with ADHD. Neuropsychologia.. 47 10: 2082–2088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond D. C.. 2006. What is neurofeedback?. J. Neurother.. 10 4: 25–36.
   Google Scholar
• Heusser K., Tellschaft D., Thoss F.. 1997. Influence of an alternating 3 Hz magnetic field with an induction of 0.1 millitesla on chosen parameters of the human occipital EEG. Neurosci. Lett.. 239 2–3: 57–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kato M.. 2006. Electromagnetics in biology. Tokyo: Springer208–219.
   Google Scholar
• Lyskov E., Juutilainen J., Jousmaki V., . 1993. Influence of short-term exposure of magnetic field on the bioelectrical processes of the brain and performance. International J. Psychophysiol.. 14 3: 227–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyskov E. B., Juutilainen J., Jousmaki V., . 1993. Effects of 45-Hz magnetic fields on the functional state of the human brain. Bioelectromagnetics.. 14 2: 87–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marino A. A., Bell G. B., Chesson A.. 1996. Low-level EMFs are transduced like other stimuli. J. Neurolog. Sci.. 144 1–2: 99–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novikov V. V., Novikov G. V., Fesenko E. E.. 2009. Effect of weak combined static and extremely low-frequency alternating magnetic fields on tumor growth in mice inoculated with the Ehrlich ascites carcinoma. Bioelectromagnetics.. 30 5: 343–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novikov V. V., Sheiman I. M., Fesenko E. E.. 2008. Effect of weak static and low-frequency alternating magnetic fields on the fission and regeneration of the planarian dugesia (Girardia) tigrina. Bioelectromagnetics.. 29 5: 387–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Othmer S. F.. 2005. Interhemispheric EEG training. J. Neurother.. 9 2: 87–96.
   Google Scholar
• Podd J., Abbott J., Kazantzis N., Rowland A.. 2002. Brief exposure to a 50 Hz, 100 μT magnetic field: Effects on reaction time, accuracy, and recognition memory. Bioelectromagnetics.. 23 3: 189–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rush S., Driscoll D. A.. 1969. EEG electrode sensitivity–an application of reciprocity. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.. 16 1: 15–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sert C., Deniz M., Duz M. Z., . 2002. The preventive effect on bone loss of 50-Hz, 1-mT electromagnetic field in ovariectomized rats. J. Bone Min. Metabol.. 20 6: 345–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sime A.. 2004. Case study of trigeminal neuralgia using neurofeedback and peripheral biofeedback. J. Neurother.. 8 1: 59–70.
   Google Scholar
• Trimmel M., Schweiger E.. 1998. Effects of an ELF (50 Hz, 1 mT) electromagnetic field (EMF) on concentration in visual attention, perception and memory including effects of EMF sensitivity. Lett.. 96–97:377–382.
   Google Scholar