Effects of 50 Hz pulsed electromagnetic fields on the growth and cell cycle arrest of mesenchymal stem cells: an in vitro study

References

• Akan Z., Aksu B., Tulunay A., . 2010. Extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields affect the immune response of monocyte-derived macrophages to pathogens. Bioelectromagnetics. 31:603–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen S. G., Blackwell R. P., Chadwick P. J., . 1994. Review of occupational exposure to optical radiation and electric and magnetic fields with regard to the proposed CEC physical agents directive. Chilton, NRPB-R265. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Chang K., Chang W. H. S., Yu Y. H., . 2004. Pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation of bone marrow cells derived from ovariectomized rats affects osteoclast formation and local factor production. Bioelectromagnetics. 25:134–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang W. H., Chen L. T., Sun J. S., . 2004. Effect of pulse-burst electromagnetic field stimulation on osteoblast cell activities. Bioelectromagnetics. 25:457–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen G., Upham B. L., Sun W., . 2000. Effect of electromagnetic field exposure on chemically induced differentiation of friend erythroleukemia cells. Environ. Health Perspect. 108:967–972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cridland N. A., Haylock R. G., Saunders R. D.. 1999. 50 Hz magnetic field exposure alters onset of S-phase in normal human fibroblasts. Bioelectromagnetics. 20:446–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Mattei M., Caruso A., Traina G. C., . 1999. Correlation between pulsed electromagnetic fields exposure time and cell proliferation increase in human osteosarcoma cell lines and human normal osteoblast cells in vitro. Bioelectromagnetics. 20:177–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng X. L., Lau C. P., Lai K., . 2007. Cell cycle-dependent expression of potassium channels and cell proliferation in rat mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow. Cell Prolif.. 40:656–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diniz P., Shomura K., Soejima K., . 2002. Effects of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) stimulation on bone tissue like formation are dependent on the maturation stages of the osteoblasts. Bioelectromagnetics. 23:398–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eleuteri A. M., Amici M., Bonfili L., . 2009. 50 Hz extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields enhance protein carbonyl groups content in cancer cells: effects on proteasomal systems. J. Biomed. Biotechnol.. 2009 834239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzsimmons R. J., Ryaby J. T., Magee F. P., . 1995. IGF-II receptor number is increased in TE-85 osteosarcoma cells by combined magnetic fields. J. Bone Miner. Res.. 10:812–819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannay G., Leavesley D., Pearcy M.. 2005. Timing of pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation does not affect the promotion of bone cell development. Bioelectromagnetics. 26:670–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu T., Li H., Zhang X., . 2008. Exposure of aortic vascular smooth muscle cells to low-frequency electromagnetic field inhibits osteopontin expression and matrix metalloproteinase activity. Int. Heart J.. 49:597–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korbling M., Estrov Z.. 2003. Adult stem cells for tissue repair: a new therapeutic concept?. N. Engl. J. Med.. 349:570–582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H. M., Kwon U. H., Kim H., . 2010. Pulsed electromagnetic field stimulates cellular proliferation in human intervertebral disc cells. Yonsei Med. J.. 51:954–959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J. K., Lin J. C., Liu H. C., . 2006. Comparison of ultrasound and electromagnetic field effects on osteoblast growth. Ultrasound Med. Biol.. 32:769–775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmann C. H., Schwartz Z., Liu Y., . 2003. Pulsed electromagnetic fields affect phenotype and connexin 43 protein expression in MLO-Y4 osteocyte-like cells and ROS 17/2.8 osteoblast-like cells. J. Orthop. Res.. 21:326–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmann C. H., Schwartz Z., Liu Y., . 2000. Pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation of MG63 osteoblast-like cells affects differentiation and local factor production. J. Orthop. Res.. 18:637–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackay A. M., Beck S. C., Murphy J. M., . 1998. Chondrogenic differentiation of cultured human mesenchymal stem cells from marrow. Tissue Eng.. 4:415–428.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Masiuk M., Rakoczy R., Masiuk S., . 2008. The expression and intranuclear distribution of nucleolin in HL-60 and K-562 cells after repeated, short-term exposition to rotating magnetic fields. Int. J. Radiat. Biol.. 84:752–760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen M., Friedenstein A. J.. 1988. Stromal stem cells: Marrow-derived osteogenic precursors. Ciba Found Symp.. 136:42–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pittenger M. F., Mackay A. M., Beck S. C., . 1999. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science. 284:143–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz Z., Simon B. J., Duran M. A., . 2008. Pulsed electromagnetic fields enhance BMP-2 dependent osteoblastic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. J. Orthop. Res.. 26:1250–1255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selvamurugan N., Kwok S., Vasilov A., . 2007. Effects of BMP-2 and pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) on rat primary osteoblastic cell proliferation and gene expression. J. Orthop. Res.. 25:1213–1220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolfa S., Skorvánek M., Stolfa P., . 2007. In vitro exposure of human chondrocytes to pulsed EMFs. Eur. J. Histochem.. 51:203–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sul A. R., Park S. N., Suh H.. 2006. Effects of sinusoidal electromagnetic field on structure and function of different kinds of cell lines. Yonsei Med. J.. 47 6: 852–861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan K., Balin A. K., Allen R. G.. 2011. Effects of static magnetic fields on the growth of various types of human cells. Bioelectromagnetics. 32:140–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun L. Y., Hsieh D. K., Lin P. C., . 2010. Pulsed electromagnetic fields accelerate proliferation and osteogenic gene expression in hMSCs during osteogenic differentiation. Bioelectromagnetics. 31:209–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun L. Y., Hsieh D. K., Yu T. C., . 2009. Effect of pulsed electromagnetic field on the proliferation and differentiation potential of hMSCs. Bioelectromagnetics. 30:251–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokalov S. V., Gutzeit H. O.. 2004. Weak electromagnetic fields (50 Hz) elicit a stress response in human cells. Environ. Res.. 94:145–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai M. T., Li W. J., Tuan R. S., . 2009. Modulation of osteogenesis in human mesenchymal stem cells by specific pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation. J. Orthop. Res.. 27:1169–1174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei Y., Xiaolin H., Tao S.. 2008. Effects of extremely low-frequency-pulsed electromagnetic field on different-derived osteoblast-like cells. Electromagn. Biol. Med.. 27:298–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winker R., Ivancsits S., Pilger A., . 2005. Chromosomal damage in human diploid fibroblasts by intermittent exposure to extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields. Mutat. Res.. 585:43–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaghoobi M. M., Mowla S. J., Tarihi T., . 2005. Nucleostemin, a coordinator of self renewal, is expressed in rat marrow stromal cells and turns off after induction of neural differentiation. Neurosci. Lett.. 890:81–86.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X., Zhang J., Qu X., . 2007. Effects of different extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields on osteoblasts. Electromagn. Biol. Med.. 26:167–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar