Measurement and analysis of electromagnetic pollution generated by GSM-900 mobile phone networks in Erciyes University, Turkey

References

• Abdel-Rassoul G., El-Fateh O. A., Salem M. A., . 2007. Neurobehavioral effects among inhabitants around mobile phone base stations. Neurotoxicology. 28:434–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adey R.. 1996. Bioeffects of mobile communications fields: possible mechanisms for cumulative dose. In: Kuster N., Balzano Q., Lin J. C.. editors. Mobile Communications Safety. New York: Chapman & Hall103–132.
   Google Scholar
• Ammoscato A., Corsale R., Dardanelli G., . GPS-GIS integrated system for electromagnetic pollution, 21. International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS) Congress, Beijing. 2008491–499.
   Google Scholar
• Balmori A.. 2009. Electromagnetic pollution from phone masts. Effects on wildlife. Pathophysiology. 16:191–199.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Balmori A.. 2005. Possible effects of electromagnetic fields from phone masts on a population of white stork (Ciconia ciconia). Electromagn. Biol. Med. 24:109–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmori A., Hallberg O.. 2007. The urban decline of the house sparrow (Passer domesticus): a possible link with electromagnetic radiation. Electromagn. Biol. Med. 26:141–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Telecommunication Standards Institute. 1997. European Telecommunication Standard Reference: DE/SMG-110606Q, France.
   Google Scholar
• Everaert J., Bauwens D.. 2009. A possible effect of electromagnetic radiation from mobile phone base stations on the number of breeding house sparrows (Passer domesticus). Electromagn. Biol. Med.. 26:63–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Evaluating compliance with fcc guidelines for human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields. FCC OET Bulletin 65. 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Communications Commission (FCC). 1999. Office of Engineering & TechnologyQuestions and Answers about Biological Effects and Potential Hazards of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields OET Bulletin 56 Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Frank D. V.. 2010. Review “Dirty Electricity”: what, where, and should we care?. J. Exposure Sci. Environ. Epidemiol.. 20:399–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galeev A. L.. 2000. The effects of microwave radiation from mobile telephones on humans and animals. Neurosci. Behav. Physiol.. 30:187–194.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Havas M.. 2006. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: biological effects of dirty electricity with emphasis on diabetes and multiple sclerosis. Environ. Resour. Stud.. 25:259–268.
   Google Scholar
• Hutter H. P., Moshammer H., Wallner P., . 2006. Subjective symptoms, sleeping problems, and cognitive performance in subjects living near mobile phone base stations. Occup. Environ. Med.. 63:307–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICNIRP. 1998. International commission on non-ionizing radiation protection, Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Phys. 74:494–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEEE (2004). International Committee On Electromagnetic Safety, IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields. 3 kHz to 300 GHz, New York, USA..
   Google Scholar
• IEEE (1991). Recommended practice for the measurement of potentially hazardous electromagnetic fields—RF and microwave. IEEE C95.3, New York, USA..
   Google Scholar
• Information Technologies and Communications Authority' (2001). Regulation on determination, measurement methods and supervision of the limit values of the electromagnetic field force from the fixed telecommunication devices operating within the frequency range of 10 kHz-60 GHz. No. 24460. Turkey's Official Gazette December 7, 2001..
   Google Scholar
• Kemerov S., Marinkev M., Getova D.. 1999. Effects of low-intensity electromagnetic fields on behavioral activity of rats. Folia Med.. 41:75–80.
   Google Scholar
• Khurana V. G., Teo C., Kundi M., . 2009. Cell phones and brain tumors: a review including the long-term epidemiologic data. Surg. Neurol.. 72:205–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramarenko A. V., Tan U.. 2003. Effects of high-frequency electromagnetic fields on human EEG: a brain mapping study. Int. J. Neurosci.. 113:1007–1019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai H.. 2005. Biological effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic field, Encyclopaedia of Biomat. Biomed. Eng. 10:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Magras I. N., Xenos T. D.. 1997. Radiation-induced changes in the prenatal development of mice. Bioelectromagnetics. 18:455–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann K., Roschkle J.. 1996. Effects of pulsed high-frequency electromagnetic fields on human sleep. Neuropsychobiology. 33:41–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marino A. A., Nilsen E., Frilot C.. 2003. Nonlinear changes in brain electrical activity due to cell phone radiation. Bioelectromagnetics. 24:339–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meltz M. L.. 2003. Radiofrequency exposure and mammalian cell toxicity, genotoxicity, and transformation. Bioelectromagnetics. 6:196–213.
   Google Scholar
• Milham S., Morgan L. L.. 2008. A new electromagnetic exposure metric: high frequency voltage transients associated with increased cancer incidence in teachers in a California school. Amer. J. Ind. Med.. 51:579–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro E. A., Segura J., Portoles M., . 2003. The microwave syndrome: a preliminary study in Spain. Electromagn. Biol. Med.. 22:161–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NCRP. A practical guide to the determination of human exposure to radiofrequency fields. NCRP Reports No. 119. 1993 USAAmericanNationalCouncilonRadiationProtectionMeasurements.
   Google Scholar
• Nikolaevich N., Igorevna A., Vasil G.. 2001. Influence of high-frequency electromagnetic radiation at non-thermal intensities on the human body (A review of work by Russian and Ukrainian researchers). No Place to Hide. 3:1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Oberfeld G., Navarro E., Portoles M., . The microwave syndrome-further aspects of a Spanish study. 3^rd International Workshop on Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields. 20042–9 Kos.
   Google Scholar
• Otto M., Von Muhlendahl K. E.. 2007. Electromagnetic fields (EMF): do they play a role in children's environmental health. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health. 210:635–644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pak N. K.. Electromagnetic waves and human health, frequently asked questions and answers. 20011–22 The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey, Bulletin.
   Google Scholar
• Paolino L., Sebillo M., Tortora G., . 2001. Monitoring electromagnetic pollution: A GIS-based visual approach. Lecture Notes Comput. Sci.. 2184:90–104.
   Google Scholar
• Samuel M.. 2010. Dirty electricity: electrification and the diseases of civilization. Bloomington, NY: Universe Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Samuel M.. 1985. Mortality in workers exposed to electromagnetic fields. Environ. Health Perspect.. 62:297–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santini R., Santini P., Danze J. M., . 2002. Symptoms experienced by people in the vicinity of base stations: I/incidences of distance and sex. Pathol. Biol.. 50:369–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santini R., Santini P., Danze J. M., . Survey study of people living in the vicinity of cellular phone base stations. Electromagn. Biol. Med.. 2003a; 22:41–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santini R., Santini P., Danze J. M., . Symptoms experienced by people in vicinity of base stations: II/Incidences of age, duration of exposure, location of subjects in relation to the antennas and other electromagnetic factors. Pathol. Biol.. 2003b; 51:412–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulaby F. T.. 2001. Fundamentals of Applied Electromagnetics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations (1992). Report of The United nations conference on environment and development, Rio de Janeiro, Annex I: Rio declaration on environment and development A/CONF. 151/26..
   Google Scholar
• Verschaeve L.. 2009. Genetic damage in subjects exposed to radiofrequency radiation. Mutat. Res.. 681:259–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschaeve L., Maes A.. 1998. Genetic, carcinogenic and teratogenic effects of radiofrequency fields. Mutat. Res.. 410:141–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar