Chronic exposure to a 2 mT static magnetic field affects the morphology, the metabolism and the function of in vitro cultured swine granulosa cells

References

• Barboni B, Martelli A, Berardinelli P, Russo V, Turriani M, Bernabò N, Lucidi P, Mattioli M. 2004. Ovarian follicle vascularization in fasted pig. Theriogenology. 62:943–957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernabò N, Berardinelli P, Mauro A, Russo V, Lucidi P, Mattioli M, Barboni B. 2011. The role of actin in capacitation-related signaling: an in silico and in vitro study. BMC Syst Biol. 5:47.
   Google Scholar
• Bernabò N, Tettamanti E, Pistilli MG, Nardinocchi D, Berardinelli P, Mattioli M, Barboni B. 2007. Effects of 50 Hz extremely low frequency magnetic field on the morphology and function of boar spermatozoa capacitated in vitro. Theriogenology. 67:801–815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernabò N, Tettamanti E, Russo V, Martelli A, Turriani M, Mattioli M, Barboni B. 2010. Extremely low frequency electromagnetic field exposure affects fertilization outcome in swine animal model. Theriogenology. 73:1293–1305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chionna A, Tenuzzo B, Panzarini E, Dwikat MB, Abbro L, Dini L. 2005. Time dependent modifications of Hep G2 cells during exposure to static magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 26:275–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eguchi Y, Ogiue M. 2003. Control of orientation of rat schwann cells using 8-T static magnetic field. Neurosci Lett. 351:130–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etienne-Manneville S. 2004. Actin and microtubules in cell motility: which one is in control?. Traffic. 5:470–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forgacs G, Yook SH, Janmey PA, Jeong H, Burd CG. 2004. Role of the cytoskeleton in signaling networks. J Cell Sci. 117:2769–2775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardel ML, Schneider IC, Aratyn-Schaus Y, Waterman CM. 2010. Mechanical integration of actin and adhesion dynamics in cell migration. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 26:315–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong FT. 1995. Magnetic field effects on biomolecules, cells, and living organisms. Biosystems. 36:187–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IARC. 2002. Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Non-ionizing radiation, Part 1: Static and extremely low-frequency (ELF) electric and magnetic fields. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancervol. 80 Monograph.
   Google Scholar
• Janmey PA. 1998. The cytoskeleton and cell signaling: component localization and mechanical coupling. Physiol Rev. 78:763–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S, Im WS, Kang L, Lee ST, Chu K, Kim BI. 2008. The application of magnets directs the orientation of neurite outgrowth in cultured human neuronal cells. J Neurosci Methods. 174:91–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leszczynski D. 2005. Report: cellular, animal and epidemiological studies of the effects of static magnetic fields relevant to human health. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 87:247–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung PCK, Adashi EJ. 2004. The ovaryElsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Lock JG, Wehrle-Haller B, Strömblad S. 2007. Cell-matrix adhesion complexes: master control machinery of cell migration. Semin Cancer Biol. 18:65–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucidi P, Bernabò N, Turriani M, Barboni B, Mattioli M. 2003. Cumulus cells steroidogenesis is influenced by the degree of oocyte maturation. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 1:45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miyakoshi J. 2005. Effects of static magnetic fields at the cellular level. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 87:213–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pate K, Benghuzzi H, Tucci M, Puckett A, Cason Z. 2003. Morphological evaluation of MRC-5 fibroblasts after stimulation with static magnetic field and pulsating electromagnetic field. Biomed Sci Instrum. 39:460–465.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Portela VM, Zamberlam G, Price CA. 2010. Cell plating density alters the ratio of estrogenic to progestagenic enzyme gene expression in cultured granulosa cells. Fertil Steril. 93:2050–2055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repacholi MH, Greenebaum B. 1999. Interaction of static and extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields with living systems: health effects and research needs. Bioelectromagnetics. 20:133–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzuto R, Bernardi P, Pozzan T. 2000. Mitochondria as all-round players of the calcium game. J Physiol. 1:37–47.
   Google Scholar
• Schenck JF. 2000. Safety of strong, static magnetic fields. J Magn Reson Imag. 12 1: 2–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz MA. 2010. Integrins and extracellular matrix in mechanotransduction. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2:a005066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafrir Y, Ben-Avraham D, Forgacs G. 2000. Trafficking and signaling through the cytoskeleton: a specific mechanism. J Cell Sci. 113:2747–2757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teodori L, Albertini MC, Uguccioni F, Falcieri E, Rocchi MB, Battistelli M, Coluzza C, . 2005. Static magnetic fields affect cell size, shape, orientation, and membrane surface of human glioblastoma cells, as demonstrated by electron, optic, and atomic force microscopy. Cytometry A. 69:75–85.
   Google Scholar
• Teodori L, Grabarek J, Smolewski P, Ghibelli L, Bergamaschi A, De Nicola M, Darzynkiewicz Z. 2002. Exposure of cells to static magnetic field accelerates loss of integrity of plasma membrane during apoptosis. Cytometry. 49:113–118.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ueno S, Iwasaka M. 1996. Magnetic nerve stimulation and effects of magnetic fields in biological, chemical and physical processes. In: Ueno S. editors. Biological effects of magnetic and electromagnetic fieldsSpringer1–21.
   Google Scholar