Drosophila oogenesis as a bio-marker responding to EMF sources

References

• Avendaño, C., Mata, A., Sanchez Sarmiento, C. A., Doncel, G. F. (2012). Use of laptop computers connected to internet through Wi-Fi decreases human sperm motility and increases sperm DNA fragmentation. Fertil. Steril. 97:39–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behari, J. (2010). Biological responses of mobile phone frequency exposure. Indian. J. Exp. Biol. 48:959–981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belyaev, I. Y., Koch, C. B., Terenius O., et al. (2006). Exposure of rat brain to 915 MHz GSM microwaves induces changes in gene expression but not double stranded DNA breaks or effects on chromatin conformation. Bioelectromagnetics. 27:295–306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank, M., Goodman, R. (1997). Do electromagnetic fields interact directly with DNA? Bioelectromagnetics. 18:111–115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank, M., Goodman, R. (2008). A mechanism for stimulation of biosynthesis by electromagnetic fields: charge transfer in DNA and base pair separation. J. Cell Physiol. 214:20–26 [Review]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank, M., Goodman, R. (2009). Electromagnetic fields stress living cells. Pathophysiology. 16:71–78
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blank, M., Goodman, R. (2011). DNA is a fractal antenna in electromagnetic fields. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 87:409–415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank, M., Goodman, R. M. (2012). Electromagnetic fields and health: DNA-based dosimetry. Electromagn. Biol. Med. 31:243--249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavaliere, V., Taddei, C., Gargiulo, G. (1998). Apoptosis of nurse cells at the late stages of oogenesis of Drosophila melanogaster. Dev. Genes Evol. 208:106--112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan, V., Qutob, S. S., Lui, S., et al. (2007). Analysis of gene expression in two humanderived cell lines exposed in vitro to a 1.9 GHz pulse modulated radiofrequency field. Proteomics. 7:3896–3905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chavdoula, E. D., Panagopoulos, D. J., Margaritis, L. H. (2010). Comparison of biological effects between continuous and intermittent exposure to GSM-900-MHz mobile phone radiation: detection of apoptotic cell-death features. Mutat. Res. 700:51–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Iuliis, G. N., Newey, R. J., King, B. V., Aitken, R. J. (2009). Mobile phone radiation induces reactive oxygen species production and DNA damage in human spermatozoa in vitro. PLoS One. 4:e6446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diem, E., Schwarz, C., Adlkofer, F., et al. (2005). Non-thermal DNA breakage by mobile-phone radiation (1800 MHz) in human fibroblasts and in transformed GFSH-R-17 granulosa cells in vitro. Mutat. Res. 583:178–183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmekaya, M. A., Ozer, C., Seyhan, N. (2011). 900 MHz pulse-modulated radiofrequency radiation induces oxidative stress on heart, lung, testis and liver tissues. Gen. Physiol. Biophys. 30:84–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, J., Kraus, S., Hauptman, Y., et al. (2007). Mechanism of short-term ERK activation by electromagnetic fields at mobile phone frequencies. Biochem. J. 405:559–568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fragopoulou, A., Grigoriev, Y., Johansson, O., et al. (2010a). Scientific panel on electromagnetic field health risks – consensus points, recommendations and rationales. Rev. Environ. Health 25:307–317
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fragopoulou, A. F., Miltiadous, P., Stamatakis, A., et al. (2010b). Whole body exposure with GSM 900 MHz affects spatial memory in mice. Pathophysiology. 17:179–187
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fragopoulou, A. F., Samara, A., Antonelou, M. H., et al. (2012). Brain proteome response following whole body exposure of mice to mobile phone or wireless DECT base radiation. Electromagn. Biol. Med. 31:250–274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonet, B., Kosik-Bogacka, D. I., Kuźna-Grygiel, W. (2009). Effects of extremely low-frequency magnetic fields on the oviposition of Drosophila melanogaster over three generations. Bioelectromagnetics. 30:687–689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, R., Bassett, C. A. L., Henderson, A. (1983). Pulsing electromagnetic fields induce cellular transcription. Science. 220:1283–1285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J.H., Fletcher, D., Tigue, J., McDonald, M. (2000). Growth and developmental stability of Drosophila melanogaster in low frequency magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 21:465–472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardell, L., Mild, K. H., Carlberg, M., Hallquist, A. (2004). Cellular and cordless telephone use and the association with brain tumors in different age groups. Arch. Environ. Health 59:132–137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardell, L., Mild, K. H., Carlberg, M., Söderqvist, F. (2006). Tumour risk associated with use of cellular telephones or cordless desktop telephones. World. J. Surg. Oncol. 4:74
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hardell, L., Carlberg, M. (2009). Mobile phones, cordless phones and the risk for brain tumours. Int. J. Oncol. 35:5–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardell, L., Carlberg, M., Hansson, M. K., Eriksson, M. (2011). Case-control study on the use of mobile and cordless phones and the risk for malignant melanoma in the head and neck region. Pathophysiology. 18:325–333
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huttunen, P., Savinainen, A., Hanninen, O., Myllyla, R. (2011). Involuntary human hand movements due to FM radio waves in a moving van. Acta Physiol. Hung. 98:157–164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juutilainen, J., Höytö, A., Kumlin, T., Naarala, J. (2011). Review of possible modulation-dependent biological effects of radiofrequency fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 32:511–534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICNIRP. (1998). Guide lines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Phys. 74:494–522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khurana, V. G., Hardell, L., Everaert, J., et al. (2010). Epidemiological evidence for a health risk from mobile phone base stations. Int. J. Occup. Environ. Health. 16:263–267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumlin, T., Iivonen, H., Miettinen, P., et al. (2007). Mobile phone radiation and the developing brain: behavioral and morphological effects in juvenile rats. Radiat. Res. 168:471–479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwee, S., Raskmark, P., Velizarov, S. (2001). Changes in cellular proteins due to environmental non-ionizing radiation. I. Heat-shock proteins. Electro. Magnetobiol. 20:141–152
   Google Scholar
• Lai, H., Singh, N. P. (1996). Single- and double-strand DNA breaks in rat brain cells after acute exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 69:513–521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. S., Choi, J. S., Hong, S. Y., et al. (2008). Mobile phone electromagnetic radiation activates MAPK signaling and regulates viability in Drosophila. Bioelectromagnetics. 29:371–379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lixia, S., Yao, K., Kaijun, W., et al. (2006). Effects of 1.8 GHz radiofrequency field on DNA damage and expression of heat shock protein 70 in human lens epithelial cells. Mutat. Res. 602:135–142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manta, A. K., Stravopodis, D. J., Papassideri, I. S., Margaritis, L. H. (2013). Reactive oxygen species elevation and recovery in Drosophila bodies and ovaries following short term and long term exposure to DECT base EMF. Electromagn. Biol. Med. (In Press)
   Google Scholar
• Margaritis, L. H., Kafatos, F. C., Petri, W. H. (1980). The eggshell of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Fine structure of the layers and regions of the wild-type eggshell. J. Cell. Sci. 43:1–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margaritis, L. H. (1985). Structure and physiology of the eggshell. In: Gilbert, L. I., Kerkut, G. A. Comprehensive Insect Biochemistry. Vol. 1. Pergammon, Oxford, New York: Physiology and Pharmacology. pp. 151–230
   Google Scholar
• Margaritis, L. H. (1986). The eggshell of Drosophila melanogaster. New staging characteristics and fine structural analysis of choriogenesis. Can. J. Zool. 64:2152–2175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCall, K. (2004). Eggs over easy: Cell death in the Drosophila ovary. Dev. Biol. 274:3–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirabolghasemi, G., Azarnia, M. (2002). Developmental changes in Drosophila melanogaster following exposure to alternating electromagnetic fields. Biolelectromagnetics. 23:416–420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nezis, I. P., Stravopodis, D. J., Papassideri, I., et al. (2000). Stage-specific apoptotic patterns during Drosophila oogenesis. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 79:610–620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nezis, I. P., Stravopodis, D. J., Papassideri, I., Margaritis, L. H. (2001). Actin cytoskeleton reorganization of the apoptotic nurse cells during the late developmental stages of oogenesis in Dacus oleae. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton. 48:224–233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nezis, I. P., Stravopodis, D. J., Papassideri, I., et al. (2002). The dynamics of apoptosis in the ovarian follicle cells during the late stages of Drosophila oogenesis. Cell Tissue Res. 307:401–409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntzouni, M. P., Stamatakis, A., Stylianopoulou, F., Margaritis, L. H. (2011). Short term memory in mice is affected by mobile phone radiation. Pathophysiology. 18:193–199
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ntzouni, M. P., Skouroliakou, A., Kostomitsopoulos, N., Margaritis, L. H. (2013). Transient and cumulative memory impairements induced by GSM 1.8 GHz cell phone signal in a mouse model. Electromagn. Biol. Med. 32:95–120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nylund, R., Leszczynski, D. (2006). Mobile phone radiation causes changes in gene and protein expression in human endothelial cell lines and the response seems to be genome- and proteome-dependent. Proteomics. 6:4769–4780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nylund, R., Tammio, H., Kuster, N., Leszczynski D. (2009). Proteomic analysis of the response of human endothelial cell line EA.hy926 to 1800 GSM mobile phone radiation. J. Proteom. Bioinform. 2:455–462
   Google Scholar
• Ono, T., Saito, Y., Komura, J., et al. (2004). Absence of mutagenic effects of 2.45 GHz radiofrequency exposure in spleen, liver, brain and testis of lacZ-transgenic mouse exposed in utero. Tohoku. J. Exp. Med. 202:93–103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos, D. J., Chavdoula, E. D., Nezis, I. P., Margaritis. L. H. (2007). Cell death induced by GSM 900 MHz and DCS 1800 MHz mobile telephony radiation. Mutat. Res. 626:69–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos, D. J., Margaritis, L. H. (2008). Mobile telephony radiation effects on living organisms. In: Harper, A. C., Burees, R. V. Mobile Telephones, Network Applications and Performance. New York: Nova Science Publishers Inc. pp. 107–149. [Review]
   Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos, D. J., Margaritis, L. H. (2010). The effect of exposure duration on the biological activity of mobile telephony radiation. Mutat. Res. 699:17–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papageorgiou, C. C., Hountala, C. D., Maganioti, A. E., et al. (2011). Effects of wi-fi signals on the p300 component of event-related potentials during an auditory hayling task. J. Integr. Neurosci. 10:189–202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, J. L., Singh, N. P., Lai H. (2009). Electromagnetic fields and DNA damage. Pathophysiology. 16:79–88
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poulletier de Gannes, F., Haro, E., Hurtier, A., et al. (2012). Effect of in utero Wi-Fi exposure on the pre- and postnatal development of rats. Birth Defects Res. B Dev. Reprod. Toxicol. 95:130–136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez, E., Monteagudo, J. L., Garcia-Gracia, M., Delgado, J. M. (1983). Oviposition and development of Drosophila modified by magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 4:315–326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remondini, D., Nylund, R., Reivinen, J., et al. (2006). Gene expression changes in human cells after exposure to mobile phone microwaves. Proteomics. 6:4745–4754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, M. R., O’Connor, A., Wallace, L., et al. (2011). Behaviors of young children around microwave ovens. J. Trauma. 71:534–536
   Google Scholar
• Ruediger, H. W. (2009). Genotoxic effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. Pathophysiology. 16:89–102
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shallom, J. M., DiCarlo, A. L., Ko, D., et al. (2002). Microwave exposure induces hsp70 and confers protection against hypoxia in chick embryos. J. Cell Biochem. 86:490–496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spradling, A. C. (1993). Developmental genetics of oogenesis. In: Bate, M., Martinez-Arias, A. The Development of Drosophila melanogaster. Vol. I. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. pp. 1–70
   Google Scholar
• Trougakos, I. P., Margaritis, L. H. (2002). Novel morphological and physiological aspects of insect eggs. In: Hilker, M., Meiners, T. Chemoecology of Insect Eggs and Egg Deposition. Berlin: Blackwell. pp. 3–36
   Google Scholar
• Tzaphlidou, M., Fotiou, E., Gousias, Ch., Matthopoulos, D. P. (2004). Development of a reliable and low-cost system for the study of EMF biological effects. Scientific World Journal. 20:100–104
   Google Scholar
• Velentzas, A. D., Nezis, I. P., Stravopodis, D. J., et al. (2006). Mechanisms of programmed cell death during oogenesis in Drosophila virilis. Cell Tissue Res. 327:399–414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschaeve, L. (2005). Genetic effects of radiofrequency radiation (RFR). Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 207:336–341 [Review]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weisbrot, D., Lin, H., Ye, L., et al. (2003). Effects of mobile phone radiation on reproduction and development in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Cell Biochem. 89:48–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, T. Y., Zou, S. P., Knapp, P. E. (2007). Exposure to cell phone radiation up-regulates apoptosis genes in primary cultures of neurons and astrocytes. Neurosci. Lett. 412:34–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar