Electric Properties of Wet Whole Bone

References

• Yasuda I. Fundamental aspect of fracture treatment. J. Kyoto Med. Soc. 1953; 4: 395–406
   Google Scholar
• Bassett C. A. L. Pulsing electromagnetic fields: A new method to modify cell behavior in calcified and noncalcified tissues. Calcif. Tiss. Int. 1982; 34: 1–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassett C. A. L., Pawluk R. J. Noninvasive method for stimulating osteogenesis. J. Biomed. Mat. Res. 1975; 9: 371–374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassett C. A. L., Sharon Mitchell N., Gaston S. R. Pulsing electromagnetic field treatment in ununited fracture and failed arthrodeses. J. Med. Assoc. 1983; 247: 623–628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brighton C. T., Katz M. J., Pollack S. R. Prevention of denervation/disuse osteoporosis in the rat with a capacitively coupled electric field. Trans. Biol. Repair Growth Soc. 1982; 2: 51
   Google Scholar
• Brighton C. T. Electrically stimulated induced 0steogenesis. Orthop. Clin. N. Am. 1984; 15
   Google Scholar
• Miller G. B., Berchardt H., Enneking W. F., Tylkarski C. M. Electromagnetic stimulation of canine bone graft. J. Bone Joint Surg. e 1984; 69‐A: 693
   Google Scholar
• Paterson D. C., Simons R. B. Electrical stimulation in the treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. J. Bone Joint Surg. 1985; 67‐B: 454–469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downes E. M., Watson J. Development of the iron‐cored electromagnet treatment of non‐union and delayed union. J. Bone Joint Surg. E 1984; 66‐B: 774–779
   Google Scholar
• Singh S., Katz J. L. Scientific basis of electro‐stimulation. J. Bioelectricity 1986; 5: 285–327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Reds Th. J. G. Electric and Electromagnetic Stimulation of Bone‐Growth. S. Karger, New York 1985
   Google Scholar
• Becker R. O. The significance of electrically stimulated osteogenesis: More questions than answers. Clin. Orthop. 1979; 141: 266–274
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Singh S., Saha S. Electrical properties of bone: A review. Clin. Orthop. 1984; 186: 249–270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh S., Saha S. Electrical characteristics of electrode‐bone interface. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 1987; 25: 448–452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakkalakal D. A., Johnson M. W., Harper R. H., Katz J. L. Dielectric properties of fluid saturated bone. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1980; 27: 95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosterich J. D., Foster K. R., Pollack S. R. Dielectric permittivity and electrical conductivity of fluid saturated bone. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1983; 30: 81–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy G. N., Saha S. Electric and dielectric properties of wet bone as a function of frequency. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1984; 31: 296–303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh S., Behari J. Frequency dependence of electrical properties of human bone. J. Bioelectricity 1984; 3: 347–356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakkalakal D. A., Johnson H. W. Electrical properties of compact bone. Clin. Orthop. 1981; 161: 133–143
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Katz J. L., Yoon H. S. The structure and anisotropic mechanical properties of bone. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1984; 31: 878–884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stan S., Sansen W., Mullier J. C. Experimental study on the electrical impedance of bone and the effect of direct current on the healing of fracture. Clin. Orthop. 1976; 120: 264–267
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwan H. P. Electrode polarization impedance and measurements in biological materials. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1968; 148: 191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sansen W., DeDijecker F., Stan S., Mullier J. C. Four point measurement of the impedance of bone in‐vivo. Electrical Stimulation of Bone‐Growth and Repair, F. Burney, et al. Springer‐Verlag, New York 1978; 15–18
   Google Scholar
• Geddes L. A. Electrodes and the Measurement of Bioelectric Events. Wiely‐Interscience, New York 1972
   Google Scholar
• Behari J., Singh S. Bioelectric characteristics of unstressed in‐vivo bone. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 1981; 19: 49–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha S., Reddy G. N., Albright J. A. Factors affecting the measurement of bone impedance. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 1984; 22: 123–129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand B., Christel P., Assailey J. In‐vitro study of electric impedance of bone. Stimulation of Bone Growth and Repair, F. Bumey, et al. Springer‐Verlag, Berlin 1978; 19
   Google Scholar
• Liboff A. R., Rinaldi R. A., Lavine L. S., Shamos M. H. On electrical conduction in living bone. Clin. Orthop. 1975; 106: 303
   Google Scholar
• Singh S., Behari J. Electrical properties of living bone under direct current. IEEE Frontiers of Engineering and Computing Health Care 1984; 168–171
   Google Scholar
• Hastings G. W. Structural and mechanical consideration in the strain‐related electrical behavior of bone. Natural and Living Biomaterials, G. W. Hastings, C. Chem, P. Ducheyne, Boca Raton, Florida 1984; 151
   Google Scholar
• Singh S., Behari J. Physical characteristics of bone composite materials. J. Biol. Phys. 1984; 12: 1–8
   Google Scholar
• Singh S., Ranu H. S. Characterization of bone materials as ultrasonic transducers. Biomaterials 1986; 7: 432–437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar