210
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Prenatal dolichocephaly: Sign of trouble? –A variant of Miller–Dieker syndrome

, , , , , & show all
Pages 308-311 | Received 21 Aug 2012, Accepted 20 Nov 2012, Published online: 10 Jan 2013

REFERENCES

  • Allanson JE, Cunniff C, Hoyme HE, Elements of morphology: standard terminology for the head and face. Am J Med Genet A 2009;149A:6–28 .
  • Moh W, Graham JM, Wadhawan I, Sanchez-Lara PA. Extrinsic factors influencing fetal deformations and intrauterine growth restriction. J Pregnancy 2012;2012: 11, doi:10.1155/2012/750485.
  • Cohen MM. Editorial: perspectives on craniosynostosis. Am J Med Genet A 2005;136A:313–326.
  • Huang MHS, Mouradian WE, Cohen SR, Gruss JS. The differential diagnosis of abnormal head shapes: separating craniosynostosis from positional deformities and normal variants. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1998;35:204–211.
  • Toyo-oka K, Shionoya A, Gambello MJ, 14–3-3[epsi] is important for neuronal migration by binding to NUDEL: a molecular explanation for Miller–Dieker syndrome. Nat Genet 2003;34:274–285.
  • Menten B, Maas N, Thienpont B, Emerging patterns of cryptic chromosomal imbalance in patients with idiopathic mental retardation and multiple congenital anomalies: a new series of 140 patients and review of published reports. J Med Genet 2006;43:625–633.
  • Cardoso C, Leventer RJ, Ward HL, Refinement of a 400-kb critical region allows genotypic differentiation between isolated lissencephaly, Miller–Dieker syndrome, and other phenotypes secondary to deletions of 17p13.3. Am J Hum Genet 2003;72:918–930.
  • Sreenath Nagamani SC, Zhang F, Shchelochkov OA, Microdeletions including YWHAE in the Miller–Dieker syndrome region on chromosome 17p13.3 result in facial dysmorphisms, growth restriction, and cognitive impairment. J Med Genet 2009;46:825–833.
  • Brown DL, DiSalvo DN, Frates MC, Placental surface cysts detected on sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2002;21:641–646.
  • Feller SM. Crk family adaptors–signalling complex formation and biological roles. Oncogene 2001;20:6348–6371.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.