Emergency planning and preparedness for the deliberate release of toxic industrial chemicals

References

• The Chemical Abstracts Service. http://www.cas.org/expertise/cascontent/registry/index.html. Accessed 15 March 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold JL. Disaster medicine in the 21st century: future hazards, vulnerabilities and risk. Prehosp Disaster Med 2002; 17(1):3–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• European Social Investment Forum. Chemical sector report 2005. http://www.eurosif.org/publications/sector_theme_reports/chemical. Accessed 18 February 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Workshop on Human Factors in Chemical Accidents and Incidents, Potsdam: Germany, 8–9 May 2007. OECD-CCA. Paris: OECD-CCA (Environment Directorate, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development).
   Google Scholar
• Culminant P. Epidemiological assessment of health effects from chemical incidents. J Occup Environ Med 2002; 59:567–572.
   Google Scholar
• de Souza AB Jr. Emergency planning for hazardous industrial areas: a Brazilian case study. Risk Anal 2000; 20(4):483–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Kemp I, van der Velden PG, Stellato RK, Roorda J, Loon JV, Kleber RJ, Gersons BBR, Lebret E. Physical and mental health shortly after a disaster: first results from the Enschede firework disaster study. Eur J Public Health 2006; 16(3):253–259.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dechy N, Bourdeaux T, Ayrault N, Kordek MA, Le Coze JC. First lessons of the Toulouse ammonium nitrate disaster, 21st September 2001, AZF plant, France. J Hazard Mater 2006; 111:131–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell D, Saunders P. The UK experience with health impact assessment of disasters. Eur J Public Health 2007; 17(1):4–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allanou R, Hansen BG, van der Bilt Y. Public availability of data on EU High Production Volume Chemicals. European Commission Joint Research Centre. Institute for Health and Consumer Protection; 1999. http://ecb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/Data-Availability-Documents/datavail.pdf. Accessed 10 October 2009.
   Google Scholar
• The United States Environment Protection Agency (USEPA). High Production Volume Challenge. http://www.epa.gov/chemrtk/pubs/general/basicinfo.htm. Accessed 13 October 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Dhara R. Health effects of the Bhopal gas leak: a review. Epidemiol Prev 1992; 143(52):22–31.
   Google Scholar
• Dhara VR, Dhara R. The union carbide disaster in Bhopal: a review of health effects. Arch Environ Health 2002; 57:391–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grievink L, van der Velden PG, Stellato RK, Dusseldorb A, Gersons BPR, Kleber RJ, Lebret E. A longitudinal comparative study of the physical and mental health problems of affected residents of the firework disaster Enschede, The Netherlands. Public Health 2007; 121(5):367–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu C-Y, Raymond DJ. Lessons learned from hazardous chemical incidents – Louisiana hazardous substances emergency events surveillance (HSEES) system. J Hazard Mater 2004; 115:33–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palaszewska-Tkacz A. Releases of dangerous chemicals in Poland in 2005 in the context of the hazardous substances emergency events surveillance (HSEES) system developed in the US. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2008; 21(4):277–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health Protection in the 21st Century. Understanding the Burden of Disease; Preparing for the Future. The Health Protection Agency; 2005. www.hpa.org.uk/publications. Accessed 9 October 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Toxic Industrial Chemicals. J R Army Med Corps 2002; 148:371–381.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marrs TC, Maynard RL, Sidell FR, eds. Chemical Warfare Agents: Toxicology and Treatment. 2nd ed. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Okumura T, Takasu N, Ishimatsu S, Miyanoki S, Mitsuhashi A, Kumada K, Tanaka K, Hinohara S. Report on 640 victims of the Tokyo subway sarin attack. Ann Emerg Med 1996; 28:129–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishiwaki Y, Maekawa K, Ogawa Y, Asukai N, Minami M, Omae K, Sarin Health Effects Study Group. Effects of sarin on the nervous system in rescue team staff members and police officers 3 years after the Tokyo subway sarin attack. Environ Health Perspect 2001; 109:1169–1173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/6660585.htm. Accessed 10 October 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hauschild VD, Bratt GM. Prioritizing industrial chemical hazards. J Toxicol Environ Health Part A 2005; 68:857–876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medical Preparedness for Terrorism and Other Disasters. Chicago: American Medical Association; 2008. http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/no-index/about-ama/13632.shtml. Accessed 10 March 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Vesell ES. Pharmacogenetic perspectives on susceptibility to toxic industrial chemicals. Br J Ind Med 1987; 44(8):505–509.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Calabrese EJ. Sex differences in susceptibility to toxic industrial chemicals. Br J Ind Med 1986; 43:577–579.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldman LR. Chemicals and children’s environment: what we don’t know about risks. Environ Health Perspect 1998; 106(3):875–880.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moudgal CJ, Garrahan K, Brady-Roberts E, Gravelis N, Arbogast M, Dun S. Human health risk assessment database, “the NHSRC toxicity value database”: supporting the risk assessment process at US EPA’s National Homeland Security Research Center. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2008; 233(1):25–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manual for the Public Health Management of Chemical incidents. World Health Organisation; 2009. http://www.who.int/entity/environmental_health_emergencies/publications/Manual_Chemical_ Incidents/en/. Accessed 9 October 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Orum P. Preventing Toxic Terrorism. How Some Chemical Facilities are Removing Danger to American Communities. Center for American Progress; 2006. http://dev.aar.org/~/media/AAR/PositionPapers/chem_ survey.ashx. Accessed 4 October 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Perry RW, Lindell MK. Preparedness for the emergency response: guidelines for the emergency planning process. Disasters 2003; 27(4):336–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Council of the European Union. COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 96/82/EC on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances; 1996. http://mahbsrv.jrc.ec.europa.eu/Framework-Seveso2-LEG-EN.html. Accessed 2 October 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford IWF, Mackway-Jones K, Russell DR, Carley SD. Delphi based consensus study into planning for chemical incidents. Emerg Med J 2004; Doi: 10.1136/emj.2003.003087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Environment Programme. Explaining APELL. Background to Awareness and Preparedness for Emergencies at the Local Level. http://www.unep.fr.htm. Accessed 13 October 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Young EJ. Health aspects of emergency planning in Canada. Can J Public Health 1961; 52:380–388.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Development of an Alerting System for Chemical Health Threats. The Health Protection Agency and European Commission. http://www.hpa.org.uk/web/HPAweb&HPAwebStandard/HPAweb_C/1217490135828. Accessed 3 October 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen DJ. DOE emergency planning & emergency management using emergency planning guidelines (ERPGS) and temporary emergency exposure levels (TEELS). Drug Chem Toxicol 1999; 22(1):15–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acute Exposure Guideline Levels. United States Environment Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/oppt/aegl/index.htm. Accessed 2 October 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Russell DR, Blain PG, Rice P. Clinical management of casualties exposed to lung damaging agents: a critical review 2006. Emerg Med J 2006; 23:421–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwenk M, Kluge S, Jaroni H. Toxicological aspects of preparedness and aftercare for chemical-incidents. Toxicology 2005; 214:232–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar