Allergic Reaction to Drugs Used Topically

References

• Aagren‐Jonsson S., Magnusson B. Sensitization to propantheline bromide, trichlorcarbanilide and propylene glycol in an antiperspirant. Contact Dermatitis 1976; 2: 79–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• A clinical cooperative study: Photochemotherapy for psoriasis. Arch. Dermatol. 1979; 115: 576–579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams R. M. Photoallergic contact dermatitis to chloro‐2‐phenylphenol. Arch. Dermatol. 1972; 106: 711–714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aeling J. L., Panagotacos P. J., Andreozzi R. J. Allergic contact dermatitis to vitamin E aerosol deodorant, (letter). Arch. Dermatol. 1974; 108: 579–580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afzelius H., Thulin H. Allergic reactions to benzalkonium chloride. Contact Dermatitis 1979; 5: 60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrup G. Hand eczema and other hand dermatoses in South Sweden. Acta Derm.‐Venereol. 1969; 49: 61, Suppl.
   Google Scholar
• Agrup G., Fregert S., Ovrum P. Importance of pure chemicals in investigations of cross sensitivity. Acta Derm.‐Venereol. 1969; 49: 417–421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alani M. D., Alani S. D. Allergic contact dermatitis to corticosteroids. Ann. Allergy 1972; 30: 181–185
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alani S. D., Alani M. D. Allergic contact dermatitis and conjunctivitis from epinephrine. Contact Dermatitis 1976; 2: 147–150
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alani S. D., Alani M. D. Allergic contact dermatitis and conjunctivitis to corticosteroids. Contact Dermatitis 1976; 2: 301–304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allenby C. F. Skin Sensitization to Remiderin and cross sensitization to hydroxyquinoline compounds. Br. Med. J. 1965; 2: 208–209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelini G., Ranticcio F., Meneghini C. L. Contact dermatitis in patients with leg ulcers. Contact Dermatitis 1975; 1: 81–87
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baer R. L., Cohen H. J., Neidorff A. H. Allergic eczematous sensitivity to aminophylline. Arch. Dermatol. 1959; 79: 647–648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer R. L., Ramsay D. N. Polyvalent light sensitivity. Allergic contact sensitivity to sulisobenzone (letter). Arch. Dermatol. 1971; 104: 446–448
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker H., Ive F. A., Lloyd M. J. Primary irritant dermatitis of the scrotum due to hexachlorophene. Arch. Dermatol. 1969; 99: 663–693
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bandmann H. J. Die Kontaktallergi durch Arzneimitteln. Pharm. Ztg. 1966; 111: 1470
   Google Scholar
• Bandmann H. J. Kontaktekzem und Ekzematogene. Muench. Med. Wochenschr. 1967; 109: 1572–1580
   Google Scholar
• Bandmann M. Zur monovalenten Kontaktallergie gegen Eucerinum anhydricum. Munich 1967, Thesis
   Google Scholar
• Bandmann H. J., Breit R. The mafenide story. Br. J. Dermatol. 1973; 89: 219–221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandmann H. J., Breit R., Matzeck E. Allergic contact dermatitis from proxymetacaine. Contact Dermatitis Newsl. 1974; 15: 451
   Google Scholar
• Bandmann H. J., Calnan C. D., Cronin E., Fregert S., Hjorth N., Magnusson B., Maibach H. I., Malten K. E., Meneghini C. L., Pirilä V., Wilkinson D. S. Dermatitis from applied medicaments. Arch. Dermatol. 1972; 106: 335–337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandmann H. J., Doenicke A. Allergisches Kontaktekzem durch Propanidid bei einem Anaesthesisten. Berufs‐Dermatosen 1971; 19: 106–165
   Google Scholar
• Bandmann H. J., Dohn W. Die Epicutantestung. Bergman, Munich 1967
   Google Scholar
• Bandmann H. J., Mutzeck E. Contact allergy to gentamycin sulfate. Contact Dermatitis Newsl. 1973; 13: 371
   Google Scholar
• Beetz D., Cramer H. J., Mehlhorn H. C. Zur Häuflgkeit der Epidermalen Allergic gegenüber Kamille in Kamillenhaltigen Arzneimitteln und Kosmetika. Dermatol. Monatsschr. 1971; 157: 505–510
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beetz D., Würbach G., Cramer H. J. Allergen analytische Untersuchungen mit hilfe der Dünnschichtchromatographie bei Uberempfindlichkeit gegenuber Arnika‐Tinctur. Allerg. Immunol. 1971; 17: 228
   Google Scholar
• Behrbohm P., Lenzner M. Sensitivity to Falicain (propoxypiperocainhydrochloride). Contact Dermatitis 1975; 1: 187–188
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bentley‐Phillips B., Bayles M. A. H. Cutaneous reactions to topical application of hydroquinone. S. Afr. Med. J. 1975; 49: 1391–1395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstresser P. R., Eaglstein W. Irritation by hydrophilic ointment under occlusion. Arch. Dermatol. 1973; 108: 218–219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlin A. R., Miller F. Allergic contact dermatitis from ethyl sebacate in Haloprogin cream. Arch. Dermatol. 1976; 112: 1563–1564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bielicky T., Novak M. Contact group sensitization to triphenylmethane dyes. Arch. Dermatol. 1969; 100: 540–543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binnick A. M., Clendenning W. E. Bacitracin contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1978; 4: 180–181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björnberg A. Skin Reactions to Primary Irritants in Patients with Hand Eczema. Isacsons, GöteborgSweden 1968
   Google Scholar
• Black J., Calesnick B., Williams D., Weinstein M. J. Pharmacology of gentamycin, A new broad spectrum antibiotic. Proceedings, Symposium on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. American Society for Microbiology, Ann Arbor, Michigan 1963; 138–147
   Google Scholar
• Bleumink E., Nater J. P. Allergic contact dermatitis to virginiamycin. Dermatologica 1972; 144: 253–256
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bleumink E., Nater J. P. Allergic contact dermatitis to virginiamycin. Contact Dermatitis Newsl. 1972; 12: 337
   Google Scholar
• Bojs G., Möller H. Eczematous contact allergy to oxytetracyclines. Berufs‐Dermatosen 1974; 22: 202–208
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braun W. Kontaktallergien gegen Polyaethylenglykole. Z. HautGeschlechtskr. 1969; 44: 385–389
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braun W., Schütz R. Kontaktallergie gegen Nitrofurazon (Furacin). Dtsch. Med. Wochenschr. 1968; 93: 1524–1526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breit R., Bandmann H. J. Dermatitis from lanolin. Br. J. Dermatol. 1973; 88: 414–416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodkin R. H., Bleiberg J. Ophthalmic side effects of a new topical psoriatic medication. Arch. Dermatol. 1968; 98: 525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunney M. H. Contact dermatitis due to bethamethasone 17 valerate (Betnovate). Contact Dermatitis Newsl. 1972; 12: 318
   Google Scholar
• Burry J. N. Photoallergies to fentichlor and multifungin. Arch. Dermatol. 1967; 95: 287–291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burry J. M. Cross sensitivity between fenticlor and bithionol. Arch. Dermatol. 1968; 97: 496–502
   Google Scholar
• Burry J. N., Hunter G. A. Photocontact dermatitis from Jadit. Br. J. Dermatol. 1970; 82: 224–229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burry J. N., Kirk J., Reid J. G., Turner T. Chlorocresol sensitivity. Contact Dermatitis 1975; 1: 41–42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Calnan C. D. Chlortetracycline sensitivity. Contact Dermatitis Newsl. 1967; 1: 16
   Google Scholar
• Calnan C. D. Isopropyl myristate sensitivity. Contact Dermatitis Newsl. 1968; 2: 38
   Google Scholar
• Calnan C. D. Chloracetamide dermatitis from a cosmetic. Contact Dermatitis Newsl. 1971; 9: 215
   Google Scholar
• Cainan C. D. Sensitivity to benzamine lactate. Contact Dermatitis 1975; 1: 56
   Google Scholar
• Calnan C. D. Allergic contact dermatitis from Germall 115, a new cosmetic preservative. Contact Dermatitis 1975; 1: 126
   Google Scholar
• Calnan C. D. Oxypolyethoxydodecane in an ointment. Contact Dermatitis 1978; 4: 168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calnan C. D. Allergy to idoxuridine ointment. Contact Dermatitis 1979; 5: 194–195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calnan C. D., Harmon R. R. M., Wells G. C. Photodermatitis from soap. Br. Med. J. 1961; ii: 1266
   Google Scholar
• Camarasa G. Contact dermatitis from mercurochrome. Contact Dermatitis 1976; 2: 120
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Camarasa G., Alomar A. Menthol dermatitis from cigarettes. Contact Dermatitis 1978; 4: 169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caron G. A., Calnan C. D. Studies in Contact Dermatitis XIV. Resorcin. Trans. St. Johns Hosp. Dermatol. Soc. 1962; 48: 149–156
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Church R. Sensitivity to hydrocortisone acetate ointment. Br. J. Dermatol. 1960; 72: 341–344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark E. W. Estimation of the general incidence of specific lanolin allergy. J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. 1975; 26: 323–335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark E. W., Cronin E., Wilkinson D. S. Lanolin with reduced sensitizing potential. Contact Dermatitis 1977; 3: 69–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comaish S. A case of hypersensitivity to corticosteroid. Br. J. Dermatol. 1969; 81: 919–925
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Conant M., Maibach H. I. Allergic contact dermatitis due to neutral red. Arch. Dermatol. 1974; 109: 735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coskey R. J. Contact dermatitis due to nystatin (letter). Arch. Dermatol. 1971; 103: 228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coskey R. J. Contact dermatitis due to multiple corticosteroid creams. Arch. Dermatol. 1978; 114: 115–117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coskey R. J. Contact dermatitis due to Clindamycin. Arch. Dermatol. 1978; 114: 446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coskey R. J., Bryan H. G. Contact dermatitis due to methylprednisolone. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1967; 199: 136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin E. Lanolin dermatitis. Br. J. Dermatol. 1966; 78: 167–174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin E. Contact Dermatitis. Churchill Livingstone, London 1980
   Google Scholar
• Crow K. D., Peachey R. D. G., Adams J. E. Coolant oil dermatitis due to ethylenediamine. Contact Dermatitis 1978; 4: 359–361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruickshank C. N. D., Squire J. R. Skin sensitivity to Cetrimide (CTAB). Br. J. Ind. Med. 1949; 6: 164–167
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dahlquist I., Fregert S. Formaldehyde releasers. Contact Dermatitis 1978; 4: 173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly J. F. Contact dermatitis due to Quotane. Arch. Dermatol. Syphilol. 1952; 66: 393–394
   Google Scholar
• Daughters D., Zackheim H. S., Maibach H. I. Urticaria and anaphylactoid reactions after topical application of mechlorethamine. Arch. Dermatol. 1973; 107: 429–430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dave V. K., Main R. A. Contact sensitivity to sodium fusidate. Contact Dermatitis Newsl. 1973; 14: 398
   Google Scholar
• De Feo C. P. Erythema multiforme bullosum caused by 9‐bromofluorene. Arch. Dermatol. 1966; 94: 545–551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degreef H., Verhoeve L. Contact dermatitis to miconazole nitrate. Contact Dermatitis 1975; 1: 269–270
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dohn W. Kontaktallergien gegen Antibiotica. Hautarzt 1960; 11: 433–440
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dupont C. Fentichlor sensitivity. Contact Dermatitis Newsl. 1974; 16: 473
   Google Scholar
• Eaglstein W. H. Allergic contact dermatitis to benzoyl peroxide. Arch. Dermatol. 1968; 97: 527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards M., Rudner E. J. Dermatitis venenata due to hydrocortisone alcohol. Cutis 1970; 6: 757–758
   Google Scholar
• Ekelund A., Möller H. Oral provocation in eczematous contact allergy to neomycin and hydroxyquinolines. Acta Derm. ‐Venereol. 1969; 49: 422–426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmett E. A., Wright R. C. Allergic contact dermatitis from TEA‐Coco hydrolyzed protein. Arch. Dermatol. 1976; 112: 1008–1009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein E. Dichlorophene allergy. Ann. Allergy 1966; 24: 437–439
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Epstein E., Maibach H. I. Formaldehyde allergy. Arch. Dermatol. 1966; 94: 186–190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein E., Maibach H. I. Ethylenediamine: Allergic contact dermatitis. Arch. Dermatol. 1968; 98: 476–477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein E. The detection of lanolin allergy. Arch. Dermatol. 1972; 106: 678–681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein J. H., Wuepper K. D., Maibach H. I. Photocontact dermatitis to halogenated salicylanilides and related compounds. Arch. Dermatol. 1968; 94: 236–244
   Google Scholar
• Epstein S. Dermal contact dermatitis from neomycin. Observations on forty cases. Ann. Allergy 1958; 16: 268–280
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Epstein S. Dermal contact dermatitis, sensitivity to Rivanol and Gentian violet. Dermatologica 1958; 117: 287–296
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Epstein S., Wenzel F. J. Sensitivity to neomycin and bacitracin, cross sensitization or coincidence?. Acta Derm.‐Venereol. 1963; 43: 1–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein S. Neomycin sensitivity and atopy. Dermatologica 1965; 130: 280–286
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Epstein S. Photoallergic contact dermatitis; Report of a case due to Dangaard. Cutis 1968; 4: 856–861
   Google Scholar
• Epstein W. L. Contribution to the pathogenesis of zirconium granulomas in man. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1960; 34: 183–188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen K. Cross allergy between paranitro compounds with special reference to DNCB and chloramphenicol. Contact Dermatitis 1978; 4: 29–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanta D., Mischer P. Contact dermatitis from tromantadine hydrochloride. Contact Dermatitis 1976; 2: 282–284
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 1979, FDA, Cosmetic Confirmed Reaction Study
   Google Scholar
• Fiedler H., Novak M., Schwank R. Untersuchungen uber Gruppensensibilisierung gegen neue Hydroxychinolin derivate. Dermatologica 1971; 143: 298–304
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finn O. A., Forsyth A. Contact dermatitis due to sorbitan monolaurate. Contact Dermatitis 1975; 1: 318
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fisher A. A. Contact Dermatitis2nd ed. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia 1973
   Google Scholar
• Fisher A. A. Patch testing with perfume ingredients. Contact Dermatitis 1975; 1: 166–168
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fisher A. A. The safety of topical erythromycin. Contact Dermatitis 1976; 2: 43–44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fisher A. A. Dermatitis due to benzocaine present in sunscreens containing glyceryl PABA (Escalol 106). Contact Dermatitis 1977; 3: 170–171
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fisher A. A. Immediate and delayed allergic contact reactions to polyethylene glycol. Contact Dermatitis 1978; 4: 135–138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher A. A. Paresthesia of the fingers accompanying dermatitis due to methylmethacrylate bone cement. Contact Dermatitis 1979; 5: 56–57
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher A. A., Dooms‐Goossens A. The effect of perfume “ageing” on the allergenecity of individual perfume ingredients. Contact Dermatitis 1976; 2: 155–159
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fisher A. A., Pascher F., Kanoff N. B. Allergic contact dermatitis due to ingredients of vehicles. Arch. Dermatol. 1971; 104: 286–290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher A. A., Pelzig A., Kanoff N. B. The persistence of allergic eczematous sensitivity and the cross sensitivity pattern to paraphenylinediamine. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1958; 30: 9–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Förstrom L., Pirilä V. Cross sensitivity within the neomycin group of antibiotics. Contact Dermatitis 1978; 4: 312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foussereau J., Petitjean J., Lantz J. P. Allergy to sodium laurylsulphate. Contact Dermatitis Newsl. 1975; 15: 433
   Google Scholar
• Freeman R. G., Knox J. M. The action spectrum of photocontact dermatitis: Caused by halogenated salicylanilides and related compounds. Arch. Dermatol. 1968; 97: 130–136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fregert S. Cross sensitization among nitrofurylaminothiadazoles. Acta Derm.‐Venereol. 1968; 48: 106–109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fregert S., Bandmann H. J. Patch Testing. Springer, Berlin 1975
   Google Scholar
• Fregert S., Dahlquist I. Allergic contact dermatitis from TEGO. Contact Dermatitis Newsl. 1969; 5: 103
   Google Scholar
• Fregert S., Groth O., Gruvberger B., Magnusson B., Mobacken H., Rorsman H. Hypersensitivity to secondary alcohols. Acta Derm. ‐ Venereol. 1971; 51: 271–272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fregert S., Hjorth N. Results of standard patch tests with substances abandoned. Contact Dermatitis Newsl. 1969; 5: 85
   Google Scholar
• Fregert S., Hjorth N. Irritants and allergens. Textbook of Dermatology2nd ed., A. Rook, D. S. Wilkinson, F. J.G. Ebling. Blackwell, Oxford 1972
   Google Scholar
• Fregert S., Hjorth N., Magnusson B., Bandmann H. J., Calnan C. D., Cronin E., Malten K. E., Meneghini C. L., Pirilä V., Wilkinson D. S. Epidemiology of contact dermatitis. Trans. St. Johns Hosp. Dermatol. Soc. 1969; 55: 17–35
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fregert S., Rorsman H. Hypersensitivity to diethylstilbestrol. Acta Derm.‐Venereol. 1960; 40: 206–219
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fregert S., Rorsman H. Hypersensitivity to diethylstilbestrol with cross sensitization to benzestrol. Acta Derm. ‐Venexeol. 1962; 42: 290–293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fregert S., Tegner E., Thelin I. Contact allergy to lidocaine. Contact Dermatitis 1979; 5: 185–188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frlis B., Hjorth N. Immediate reactions to patch tests with balsam of Peru. Contact Dermatitis Newsl. 1973; 13: 389
   Google Scholar
• Fry L. Skin disease from color developers. Br. J. Dermatol. 1965; 77: 456–461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaul L. E. Dermatitis from cetyl and stearyl alcohols. Arch. Dermatol. 1959; 99: 593
   Google Scholar
• Gelfarb M., Leider M. Allergic eczematous contact dermatitis. Arch Dermatol. 1960; 82: 642–643
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goette D. K., Odom R. B. Allergic contact dermatitis to topical fluorouracil. Arch. Dermatol. 1977; 113: 1050–1061
   Google Scholar
• Goldenberg R. L., Nelson K. Dermatitis from neutral red therapy of herpes genitalis. Obstet. Gynecol. 1975; 46: 359–360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman G. C., Epstein E. Contact photosensitivity from sun‐protective agent. Arch. Dermatol. 1969; 100: 447–449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodmann T. F. Photodermatitis from a sunscreening agent (letter). Arch. Dermatol. 1970; 102: 563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon B. I., Malbach H. I. Eccrine anhidrosis due to glutaraldehyde, formaldehyde and lontophoresis. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1969; 53: 436–439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottschalk H. R., Stone O. J. Stevens‐Johnson syndrome from ophthalmic sulfonamide. Arch. Dermatol. 1976; 112: 513–514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greither A., Gisbertz C., Ippen H. Teerbehandlung und Krebs. Z. Haut‐ Geschlechtskr. 1967; 42: 463–635
   Google Scholar
• Grimalt F., Romaguera C. Sensitivity to petrolatum. Contact Dermatitis 1978; 4: 377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groen J., Bleumink E., Nater J. P. Variotin sensitivity. Contact Dermatitis Newsl. 1973; 15: 456
   Google Scholar
• Grunnet E. Contact urticaria and anaphylactoid reaction induced by topical application of nitrogen mustard. Br. J. Dermatol. 1976; 94: 101–103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guill M. A., Goette D. K., Knight C. G., Peck C. C., Lupton G. P. Erythema multiforme and urticaria. Arch. Dermatol. 1979; 115: 742–743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunderson K. Int. J. Dermatol.
   Google Scholar
• Hannuksela M., Förström L. Contact hypersensitivity to glycerol. Contact Dermatitis 1976; 2: 291
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hannuksela M., Förström L. Reactions to per oral propylene glycol. Contact Dermatitis 1978; 4: 41–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannuksela M., Kousa M., Pirilä V. Allergy to ingredients of vehicles. Contact Dermatitis 1976; 2: 105–110
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hannuksela M., Kousa M., Pirillä V. Contact sensitivity to emulsifiers. Contact Dermatitis 1976; 2: 201–204
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hannuksela M., Pirilä V., Salo O. P. Skin reactions to propulene glycol. Contact Dermatitis 1975; 1: 112–116
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heijer A. Sensitization to xanthocillin in salve. Acta Derm. ‐ Venereol. 1961; 41: 201–204
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hjorth N. Contact dermatitis from vitamin B (Thiamine). Relapse after ingestion of thiamine. Cross sensitization to cocarboxylase. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1958; 30: 261–264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjorth N. Eczematous allergy to balsams. Acta Derm.‐Venereol. 1961; 41: 46, Suppl.
   Google Scholar
• Hjorth N. Occupational dermatitis among veterinary surgeons caused by penethamate (benzyl‐penicillin‐B‐diethyl‐aminoethyl ester). Berufsdermatosen 1967; 15: 163–175
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hjorth N. Contact dermatitis from 1,3‐diiodo‐2‐hydroxypropane. Contact Dermatitis Newsl. 1972; 12: 322
   Google Scholar
• Hjorth N. Diagnostic patch testing. Dermatotoxicology and Pharmacology, F. N. Marzulli, H. I. Maibach. Hemisphere Publishing Corp., Washington, D.C. 1977; 341–352
   Google Scholar
• Hjorth N., Roed‐Petersen J. Occupational protein contact dermatitis in food handiers. Contact Dermatitis 1976; 2: 28–42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hjorth N., Thomsen K. Differences in sensitizing capacity of neomycin in creams and in ointments. Br. J. Dermatol. 1968; 80: 163–169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjorth N., Trolle‐Lassen C. Skin reactions to preservatives in cream with special regard to paraben esters and sorbic acid. Am. Cosmet. Perfum. 1962; 77: 43
   Google Scholar
• Hjorth N., Trolle‐Lassen C. Skin reactions to ointment bases. Trans. St. Johns Hosp. Dermatol. Soo. 1963; 49: 127–140
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hjorth N., Wilkinson D., Magnusson B., Bandmann H. J., Maibach H. I. Glyceryl p‐aminobenzoate patch testing in benzocaine‐sensitive subjects. Contact Dermatitis 1978; 4: 46–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holder R. Presentation to the American Academy of Dermatology. San Francisco 1978
   Google Scholar
• Horio T., Higuchi T. Photocontact dermatitis from p‐amino‐benzoid acid. Dermatologica 1978; 156: 124–128
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huriez C., Agache P., Marten P., Vendaume G., Mennecier J. L'Allergie aux sels d'ammonium guaternaire. Sem. Hop. Paris 1965; 41: 2301–2304
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iden D. L., Schroeter A. L. The vehicle tray revisited: The use of the vehicle tray in assessing allergic contact dermatitis by a 24‐hour application method. Contact Dermatitis 1977; 3: 122–126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Contact Dermatitis Research Group (ICDRG), Triclorban‐Evaluation of contact dermatitis potential in man. Contact Dermatitis 1978; 4: 283–288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jillson O. F., Baughman R. D. Contact photodermatitis from bithionol. Arch. Dermatol. 1963; 88: 409–418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jirásek L., Schwank R. Berufskontakt Ekzem durch Vitamin K. Hautarzt 1965; 16: 351–353
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jordan W. P., Dahl M. V., Albert H. L. Contact dermatitis from glutaraldehyde. Arch. Dermatol. 1972; 105: 94–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan W. P., Higgins M., Dvorak J. Allergic contact dermatitis to all‐trans retinoic acid; epicutaneous and leukocyte migration inhibition testing. Contact Dermatitis 1975; 1: 306–310
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jordan W. P., King S. E. Delayed hypersensitivity in females. Contact Dermatitis 1977; 3: 19–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhlin L., Hansson H. Topical glutaraldehyde for plantar hyperhidrosis. Arch. Dermatol. 1968; 97: 327–330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn G. Intensified contact sensitization to benzyl salicylate. Arch. Dermatol. 1971; 103: 497–500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaidby K. H., Kligman A. M. Photocontact allergy to 6‐methylcoumarin. Contact Dermatitis 1978; 4: 277–282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassen B., Mitchell J. C. Contact urticaria from a vitamin E preparation in two siblings. Contact Dermatitis Newsl. 1974; 16: 482
   Google Scholar
• Keil H. Group reactions in contact dermatitis due to resorcinol. Arch. Dermatol. 1962; 86: 212–216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaschka F., Beiersdorff H. U. Crux medicorum: Allergie gegen nichtdeklarierte Salben konservantien. Muench. Med. Wochenschr. 1965; 107: 185–188
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klecak G. Identification of contact allergens: Predictive tests in animals. Dermatotoxicology and Pharmacology, F. N. Marzulli, H. I. Maibach. Hemisphere Publishing Corp., Washington, D.C. 1977; 305–339
   Google Scholar
• Kleinhans D., Knoth W. Paraben‐kontakt Allergie mit enteraler Provokation. Z. Haut‐ Geschlechtskr. 1973; 48: 699–701
   Google Scholar
• Kligman A. M., Epstein W. L. Mechanisms of Hypersensitivity. Little Brown, Boston 1959
   Google Scholar
• Kooij R., Van Vloten Th. J. Epidermal sensitization due to sulphonamide drugs. Dermatologica 1952; 104: 151–167
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krook G. Contact sensitivity to oxyphenbutazone (Tanderil) and cross sensitivity to phenylbutazone (Butazolidine). Contact Dermatitis 1975; 1: 385–386
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lachapelle J. M. Contact sensitivity to bufexamac. Contact Dermatitis 1975; 1: 261
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lahti A. Skin reactions to some antimicrobial agents. Contact Dermatitis 1978; 4: 302–303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen W. G. Cosmetic dermatitis due to a perfume. Contact Dermatitis 1975; 1: 142–145
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larsen W. G. Perfume dermatitis, a study of 20 patients. Arch. Dermatol. 1977; 113: 623–626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leifer W., Steiner K. Studies in sensitization to halogenated hydroxyquinolines and related compounds. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1951; 17: 233–240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leyden J. J., Kligman A. M. Contact sensitization to benzoyl peroxide. Contact Dermatitis 1977; 3: 273–275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liden S. Alphosyl sensitivity and propyl gallate. Contact Dermatitis 1975; 1: 257–258
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liden S., Göransson K. Contact allergy to dibenzthion. Contact Dermatitis 1975; 1: 258
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindgren S., Groth O., Molin L. Allergic contact response to vitamin A acid. Contact Dermatitis 1976; 2: 212–217
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindholm L., Magnusson B. L., Mobacken H. Depressed nonspecific lymphocyle reactivity in psoriasis. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 1978; 263: 121–125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lungren B., Möller H. Eczematous contact allergy to chlorhexidine. Acta Derm. ‐ Venereol. 1972; 52: 308–310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig E., Hansen B. M. Sensitivity to isopropyl alcohol. Contact Dermatitis 1977; 3: 240–244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson B., Hersle K. Patch test methods. Acta Derm. ‐ Venereol. 1965; 45: 257–261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson B., Fregert S., Hjorth N., Hövding G., Pirilä V., Skog E. Routine patch testing V. Acta Derm.‐Venereol. 1969; 49: 556–563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson B., Kligman A. M. Usefulness of guinea pig tests for detection of contact sensitizers. Dermatotoxicology and Pharmacology, F. N. Marzulli, H. I. Maibach. Hemisphere Publishing Corp., Washington, D.C. 1977; 551–560
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson B., Kligman A. M. Factors affecting allergic contact sensitization. Dermatotoxicology and Pharmacology, F. N. Marzulli, H. I. Maibach. Hemisphere Publishing Corp., Washington, D.C. 1977; 289–304
   Google Scholar
• Maguire H. C. Induction of delayed hypersensitivity to nitrogen mustard in guinea pig. Br. J. Dermatol. 1974; 91: 26–26
   Google Scholar
• Maibach H. Allergic sensitization potential (Draize test) in man of several preservatives. Contact Dermatitis Newsl. 1971; 9: 213
   Google Scholar
• Maibach H. I. Acute laryngeal obstruction presumed secondary to thiomersal (merthiolate) delayed hypersensitivity. Contact Dermatitis 1975; 1: 221–222
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maibach H. I. Glutaraldehyde cross reactions to formaldehyde. Contact Dermatitis 1975; 1: 326–327
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maibach H. I. Chronic dermatitis and hyperpigmentation from petrolatum. Contact Dermatitis 1978; 4: 62
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maibach H. I., Conant M. Contact urticaria to a corticosteroid cream: Polysorbate 60. Contact Dermatitis 1977; 3: 350–351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maibach H. I., Johnson H. L. Contact urticaria syndrome. Arch. Dermatol. 1975; 111: 726–730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maibach H. I., Prystowsky S. D. Glutaraldehyde (Pentanedial) allergic contact dermatitis. Arch. Dermatol. 1977; 113: 170–171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majeti V. A., Suskind R. R. Mechanism of cinnamaldehyde sensitization. Contact Dermatitis 1977; 3: 16–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malten K. E. Betnelan V lotion. Contact sensitivity. Contact Dermatitis Newsl. 1973; 12: 360
   Google Scholar
• Malten K. E., Nater J. P., Van Ketel W. G. Patch Testing Guidelines. Dekker & Van de Vegt, Nijmegen 1976
   Google Scholar
• March C., Greenwood M. A. Allergic contact dermatitis to porparacaine. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1968; 19: 159–160
   Google Scholar
• Marcussen P. V. Contact dermatitis due to formaldehyde in textiles. 1934–1958. Preliminary report. Acta Derm.‐Venereol. 1959; 39: 348–356
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marzulli F. N., Maibach H. I. Antimicrobials: Experimental contact sensitization in man. J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. 1973; 24: 399–421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzulli F. N., Maibach H. I. The use of graded concentrations in studying skin sensitizers: Experimental sensitization in man. Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 1974; 12: 219–227
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marzulli F. N., Maibach H. I. Dermatotoxicology and Pharmacology. Hemisphere Publishing Corp., Washington, D.C. 1977
   Google Scholar
• Marzulli F. N., Maibach H. I. Contact allergy: Predictive testing in humans. Dermatotoxicology and Pharmacology, F. N. Marzulli, H. I. Maibach. Hemisphere Publishing Corp., Washington, D.C. 1977; 353–372
   Google Scholar
• Mathias C. G. T., Maibach H. I. Dermatotoxicology Monographs I. Cutaneous irritation: Factors influencing the response to irritants. Clin. Toxicol. 1978; 13: 333–346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathias C. G. T., Maibach H. L., Epstein J. Allergic contact photodermatitis to para‐amino‐benzoic acid. Arch. Dermatol. 1978; 114: 1165–1666
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mathias C. G. T., Maibach H. I., Ostler H. B., Conant M. A., Nelson W. Delayed hypersensitivity to retrobulbar injections of methylprednisolone acetate. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1978; 86: 816–819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathias C. G. T., Maibach H. L., Irvine A., Adler W. Allergic contact dermatitis to echothiophate iodide and phenylephrine. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1979; 97: 286–287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathias C. G. T., Caldwell T. M., Maibach H. I. Contact dermatitis and gastrointestinal symptoms from hydroxyethylmethacrylate. Br. J. Dermatol. 1979; 100: 447–449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathias C. G. T., Conant M., Maibach H. I. Contact depigmentation from cinnamic aldehyde. Arch. Dermatol.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maucher O. M. Beitrag zur Kreuz oder Kopplingsallergie zur Parahydroxybenzoe‐säure‐ester. Berufs‐Dermatosen 1974; 22: 183–187
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Melski J. W., et al. Oral methoxysalen photochemotherapy for the treatment of psoriasis. A cooperative clinical trial. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1977; 68: 328–335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meltzer L., Baer R. L. Sensitization to monoglycerol paraaminobenzoate. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1949; 12: 31–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menné T. The prevalence of nickel allergy among women. Derm. beruf Umwelt. 1978; 26: 123–125
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Menne T., Andersen K. E. Allergic contact dermatitis from fluocortolone, fluocortolone pivalate and fluocortolone caproate. Contact Dermatitis 1977; 3: 337–340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meneghini C. L., Angelini G. Contact dermatitis from pyrrolnitrin (an antimycotic agent). Contact Dermatitis 1975; 1: 288–292
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meneghini C. L., Rantuccio F., Lomuto M. Additives, vehicles and active drugs of topical medicaments as causes of delayed‐type allergic dermatitis. Dermatologica 1971; 143: 137–147
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Michel P. J., Buyer R., Delorme M. Accidents généraux (cyanose, collapse cardiovasculaire) par sensibilisation à une solution aqueuse de violet de gentiane et vert de méthyle en application locale. Bull. Soc. Fr. Dermatol. Syphilol. 1958; 65: 183
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Minkin W., Cohen H. J., Frank S. B. Contact dermatitis from deodorants (letter). Arch. Dermatol. 1973; 107: 774–775
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell J. C. The skin and chemical additives to foods (letter). Arch. Dermatol. 1971; 104: 329–330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell J. C. Multiple concomitant positive patch test reactions. Contact Dermatitis 1977; 3: 315–320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mischer P., Fanta D. Das Tomantadin‐Kontaktekzem. Hautarzt 1978; 29: 337–339
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Möller H. Merthiolate allergy: A nationwide iatrogenic sensitization. Acta Derm.‐ Venereol. 1977; 57: 509–517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan J. K. Iatrogenic epidermal sensitivity. Br. J. Clin. Pract. 1968; 22: 261–264
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mortensen T. Allergy to lanolin. Contact Dermatitis 1979; 5: 137–139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama H., Nanaoka H., Ohshiro A. Allergen Controlled System (ACS). Kanekara Shuppan, Tokyo 1974
   Google Scholar
• Nater J. P. Allergic reactions due to chloracetamide. Dermatologica 1971; 142: 191–192
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nater J. P. Drugs used on the skin. Meyler's Side Effects of Drugs, M. N. G. Dukes. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam 1975; Vol. VIII: 354
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson D. C. Sources of allergenic gums. Ann. Allergy 1960; 18: 518–524
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nordquist B. C., Mehr K. Allergic contact dermatitis to retinoic acid. Contact Dermatitis 1977; 3: 55–56
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North American Contact Dermatitis Group. Epidemiology of contact dermatitis in North America, 1972. Arch. Dermatol. 1973; 108: 537–540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North American Contact Dermatitis Group. The frequency of contact sensitivity in North America 1972–74. Contact Dermatitis 1975; 1: 277–280
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Odom R. B., Maibach H. I. Contact urticaria: A different contact dermatitis. Dermatotoxicology and Pharmacology, F. N. Marzulli, H. I. Maibach. Hemisphere Publishing Corp., Washington, D. C. 1977; 441–453
   Google Scholar
• Oleffe J. A., Blondel A., Boschmans S. Patch testing with lanolin. Contact Dermatitis 1978; 4: 233–234
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Opdyke D. L. The safety of fragrance materials. Br. J. Dermatol. 1975; 93: 351
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O'Quinn S. E., Kennedy C. B., Isbel K. H. Contact photodermatitis due to bithionol and related compounds. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1967; 199: 89–92
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osmundsen P. E. Pigmented contact dermatitis. Br. J. Dermatol. 1970; 83: 296–301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osmundsen P. E. Contact photodermatitis due to tribromsalicylanilide (cross reaction pattern). Dermatologica 1970; 140: 65–74
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Osmundsen P. E. Allergic contact dermatitis from idoxuridine. Contact Dermatitis 1975; 1: 251
   Google Scholar
• Panzer J. D., Epstein W. L. Percutaneous absorption following topical application of neomycin. Arch. Dermatol. 1970; 102: 536–539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pariser R. J. Contact dermatitis to dioxybenzone. Contact Dermatitis 1977; 3: 172
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Papa C. M., Shelley W. B. Menthol hypersensitivity. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1964; 189: 546–548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paschoud J. M. Eczéma de contact par la crème Dianabol. Dermatologica 1966; 133: 125–127
   Google Scholar
• Petersen H. O. Hypersensitivity to propolis. Contact Dermatitis 1977; 3: 278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pevny I., Schellenberg J. Sensibilisierungen und Gruppensensibilisierungen durch Chinolinderivate. Hautarzt 1971; 22: 13–18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pirillä V., Förström L., Rouhunkoski S. Twelve years of sensitization to neomycin in Finland: Report of 1760 cases of sensitivity to neomycin and/or bacitracin. Acta Derm.‐Venereol. 1967; 47: 419–425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirilä V., Kilpio O., Olkkonen A., Pirilä L., Siltanen E. On the chemical nature of the eczematogens in oil of turpentine. Dermatologica 1969; 139: 183–194
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pirilä V., Rouhunkoski S. On sensitization to neomycin and bacitracin. Acta Derm.‐Venereol. 1959; 39: 470–476
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pirilä V., Wallemius T. Uber die ekzematose Sensibilisierung gegen Neomycin und Bacitracin. Hautarzt 1957; 8: 518
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plewig G., Hofmann C., Braun‐Falco O. Photoallergic dermatitis from 8‐methoxy psoralen. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 1978; 261: 201–211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polak L. Immunological aspects of contact sensitivity. Dermatotoxicology and Pharmacology, F. N. Marzulli, H. I. Maibach. Hemisphere Publishing Corp., Washington, D.C. 1977; 225–288
   Google Scholar
• Prater E., Göring H. D., Schubert H. Sodium lauryl sulfate–A contact allergen. Contact Dermatitis 1978; 4: 242–243
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prystowsky S. O., et al. Allergic contact hypersensitivity to nickel, neomycin, ethylenediamine, and benzocaine. Arch. Dermatol. 1979; 115: 959–962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raab W. P. Mast cell depleting properties of neomycin. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1968; 50: 138–140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsay D. L., Cohen H. J., Baer R. L. Allergic reaction to benzophenene. Arch. Dermatol. 1972; 105: 906–908
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Recommendation by the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Routine patch test series, 1974. Br. J. Dermatol. 1973; 89: 437–438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rietschel R. L. Photocontact dermatitis to hydrocortisone. Contact Dermatitis 1978; 4: 334–337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rietschel R. L. Contact urticaria from synthetic cassia oil and sorbic acid limited to the face. Contact Dermatitis 1978; 4: 347–349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rietschel R. L., Lewis C. W. Contact dermatitis to homomenthyl salicylate. Arch. Dermatol. 1978; 114: 442–443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson H. M. Local antibiotic therapy. Acta Derm. ‐Venereol., Proc. 11 Int. Congr. Dermatol. 1957; 3: 108–112
   Google Scholar
• Roed‐Petersen J. Erythema multiforme as an expression of contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1975; 1: 270–271
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roed‐Petersen J. Contact sensitivity to metaoxedrine. Contact Dermatitis 1976; 2: 235–236
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roed‐Petersen J., Auken G., Hjorth N. Contact sensitivity to Irgasan DP 300. Contact Dermatitis 1975; 1: 293–294
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roed‐Petersen J., Hjorth N. Contact dermatitis from antioxidants. Hidden sensitizers in topical medications and foods. Br. J. Derm. 1976; 94: 233–241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roed‐Petersen J., Menné T. Allergic contact dermatitis and lichen planus from black and white photographic developing. Cutis 1976; 18: 699–705
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rothenborg H. W., Hjorth N. Allergy to perfumes from toilet soaps and detergents in patients with dermatitis. Arch. Dermatol. 1968; 97: 417–421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roupe G., Strannegaard O. Anaphylactic shock elicited by topical administration of bacitracin. Arch. Dermatol. 1969; 100: 450–452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin A. Ophthalmic sulfonamide induced Stevens‐Johnson syndrome. Arch. Dermatol. 1977; 113: 235–236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudzki E., Grzywa Z. Balsam of Peru as screening agent for essential oils sensitivity. Dermatologica 1977; 155: 115–121
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rudzki E., Grzywa Z. Occupational dermatitis partly elicited by coal tar. Contact Dermatitis 1977; 3: 54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudzki E., Grzywa Z. Dermatitis from retinoic acid. Contact Dermatitis 1978; 4: 305–306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudzki E., Koslowska A. Sensitivity to salicylic acid. Contact Dermatitis 1976; 2: 178
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rudzki E., Zakrzewski Z. Incidence of contact sensitivity to topically applied drugs as compared with the frequency of their prescription. Contact Dermatitis 1975; 1: 249–250
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salo O. P., Pirilä V., Viljanen E. Sensitivity to topical dequalene. Acta Allergol. 1968; 23: 490–496
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sams W. M. Contact photodermatitis. Arch. Dermatol. 1956; 73: 142–148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sams W. M. Untoward response with topical fluorouracil. Arch. Dermatol. 1968; 97: 14–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satulsky E. M. Photosensitization induced by monoglycerol para‐aminobenzoate. Arch. Dermatol. 1950; 62: 711–713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sausker W. F., Frederick F. D. Allergic contact dermatitis secondary to topical nitroglycerin. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1978; 239: 1743–1744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider H. G. Schwefel‐allergie. Hautarzt 1978; 29: 340–342
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schoeffinius H. H. Kontaktdermatitis mit erhohter Körpertemperatur unter Behandlung von Psortasis vulgaris capillitii mit einen Benzoxathiol‐desinat. Z. Haut‐ Geschlechtskr. 1972; 47: 227–229
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scholz A., Richter G. Zur allergie gegen Falicain (propipokain‐hydrochloride). Dermatol. Monatsschr. 1977; 163: 966–969
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schöne K. Klinische Erfahrungen mit einem Heparinoid externum in hoher Wirkstoff konzentration. Fortschr. Med. 1975; 93: 1565–1566
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schorr W. F. Paraben allergy: A cause of intractable dermatitis. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1968; 204: 859–862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schorr W. F. Dichlorophene (G‐4) allergy. Arch. Dermatol. 1970; 102: 515–520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schorr W. F. Cosmetic allergy. Arch. Dermatol. 1971; 104: 459–466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schorr W. L., Ridgway H. B. Tobramycin‐neomycin cross sensitivity. Contact Dermatitis 1977; 3: 133–137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreus H. Th. Warum und wie sensibilisiert Marfanil?. Hautarzt 1950; 1: 401–404
   Google Scholar
• Schulz K. H. Chemische Struktur und allergene Wirking. Aulendorf, Württemberg 1962
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz K., Storck H. Ekzematose Sensibilisierung auf Methandrostenoion in Salbenform. Dermatologica 1966; 132: 73–73
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shelley W. B., Hurley H. J. The allergic origin of zirconium deodorant granulomas in man. Br. J. Dermatol. 1958; 70: 75–101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shmunes E. Purpuric allergic contact dermatitis to paraphenylenediamine. Contact Dermatitis 1978; 4: 225–229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shore R. N., Shelley W. B. Contact dermatitis from stearyl alcohol and propylene glycol in fluocinonide cream. Arch. Dermatol. 1974; 109: 397–399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidi E., Hincky M., Longueville R. Cross sensitization between neomycin and streptomycin. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1958; 30: 225–231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeenk G. Contact allergy to bufexamac. Dermatologica 1973; 147: 334–337
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smeenk G., Prinz F. J. Allergic contact eczema due to chloracetamide. Dermatologica 1972; 144: 108–114
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith S. Z., Epstein J. H. Photocontact dermatitis to halogenated salicylanilides and related compounds. Arch. Dermatol. 1977; 113: 1372–1374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sneddon I. B., Glew R. C. Contact dermatitis due to propanidid in an anaesthetist. Practitioner 1973; 211: 321–323
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spencer P. S., Sterman A. B., Horoujian D., Bischoff M. Neurotoxic changes in rats exposed to the fragrance compound acetyl ethyl tetramethyl tetralin. Neurotoxicology 1979; 1: 221–237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spott D. A., Shelley W. B. Exanthem due to contact allergen (Benzoin) absorbed through skin. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1970; 214: 1881–1882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starke J. C., Jillson O. F. Photosensitization to coal tar. A cause of psoriatic erythroderma. Arch. Dermatol. 1961; 84: 935–936
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stern R. S., et al. Risk of cutaneous carcinoma in patients treated with oral methoxsalen photochemotherapy for psoriasis. N. Engl. J. Med. 1979; 300: 809–813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storrs F. Para‐chloro‐meta‐xylenol allergic contact dermatitis, in seven individuals. Contact Dermatitis 1975; 1: 211–213
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stotts J., Ely W. J. Induction of human skin sensitization to ethanol. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1977; 69: 219–222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugai T., Higashi J. Hypersensitivity to hydrogenated lanolin. Contact Dermatitis 1975; 1: 146–157
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sugai T., Takahashi Y., Takagi T. Pigmented cosmetic dermatitis and coal tar dye. Contact Dermatitis 1977; 3: 249–256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulzberger N. B., Kanof A., Baer R. L., Lowenberg C. Sensitization by topical application of sulfonamides. J. Allergy 1947; 18: 92–103
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sundararajan V. Variotin sensitivity. Contact Dermatitis Newsl. 1970; 8: 188
   Google Scholar
• Tarnick M. Hautsensibilisierungen gegen Thiosinamin (Aurinosin) Allylthiokarbamid. Dermatol. Monatsschr. 1976; 162: 905–908
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor J. R., Halprin K. M. Topical use of mechlorethamine in the treatment of psoriasis. Arch. Dermatol. 1972; 106: 362–364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tegner E. Contact allergy to corticosteroids. Int. J. Dermatol. 1976; 15: 520–523
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thormann J., Kaaber K. Contact sensitivity to phenylbutazone ointment (Butazolidine). Contact Dermatitis 1978; 4: 235–236
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turner T. W. Contact dermatitis due to lignocaine. Contact Dermatitis 1977; 3: 210–211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Andel P., Bleumink E., Nater J. P. The significance of positive patch tests to wood tars. Trans. St. Johns Hosp. Dermatol. Soc. 1974; 60: 94–98
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Dijk T. J. A., Marier K. Allergic contact dermatitis from Eurax. Contact Dermatitis Newsl. 1972; 12: 344
   Google Scholar
• Van Hecke E. Arch. Belg. Dermatol. 1973; 29: 301–303
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Ketel W. G. Allergy to coumarin and coumarin‐derivatives. Contact Dermatitis Newsl. 1973; 13: 355
   Google Scholar
• Van Ketel W. G. Polymyxin B sulfate and bacitracin. Contact Dermatitis Newsl. 1974; 15: 445
   Google Scholar
• Van Ketel W. G. Allergic contact eczema by Hexomedine. Contact Dermatitis 1975; 1: 332
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Ketel W. G. Allergic contact dermatitis from propellants in deodorant sprays in combination with allergy to ethyl chloride. Contact Dermatitis 1976; 2: 115–119
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Ketel W. G. Immediate and delayed type allergy to erythromycin. Contact Dermatitis 1976; 2: 363–364
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Ketel W. G. Allergy to idoxuridine eyedrops. Contact Dermatitis 1977; 3: 106
   Google Scholar
• Veien N. K., Svejgaard E. Lymphocyte transformation in patients with cobalt dermatitis. Br. J. Dermatol. 1978; 99: 191–196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velasco J. E., Africk J. A. Contact dermatitis to mafenide acetate. Arch. Dermatol. 1971; 103: 61–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeulen C. W., Malten K. E. Contact eczeem door 6‐alpha‐chloorprednixon en neomycine. Ned. Tijdschr. Geneeskd. 1963; 107: 548–551
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vooys R. C., Van Ketel W. G. Allergic drug eruption from pyrazolone compounds. Contact Dermatitis 1977; 3: 57–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade T. R., Jones H. E., Artis W. A. Irritant and allergic reactions to topically applied Micatin cream. Contact Dermatitis 1979; 5: 168–170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlberg J. E. Two cases of hypersensitivity to quaternary ammonium compounds. Acta Derm.‐Venereol. 1962; 42: 230–234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlberg J. E. Sensitization to thioxolone. Contact Dermatitis, Newsl. 1971; 10: 222
   Google Scholar
• Wahlberg J. E. Routine patch testing with Irgasan DP 300. Contact Dermatitis 1976; 2: 292
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wahlberg J. E., Wennersten G. Hypersensitivity and photosensitivity to chlorhexidine. Dermatologica 1971; 143: 376–379
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Warshaw T. G., Herrmann F. Studies of skin reactions to propylene glycol. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1952; 19: 423–430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasilewski C. Allergic contact dermatitis from nystatin. Arch. Dermatol. 1970; 102: 216–217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wereide K. Neomycin sensitivity in atopic dermatitis and other eczematous conditions. Acta Derm. ‐ Venereol. 1970; 50: 114–116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wereide K. Sensitivity to azidamphenicol. Contact Dermatitis 1975; 1: 271–272
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• White M. I. Contact dermatitis from ethylene diamine. Contact Dermatitis 1978; 4: 291–293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiegel O. Kontaktallergic durch Kortikosteroid‐haltige externa. Med. Welt. 1968; 19: 828–829
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson D. S. Photodermatitis due to tetrachlorosalicylanilide. Br. J. Dermatol. 1961; 73: 213–219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson D. S. Patch test reactions to certain halogenated salicylanilides. Br. J. Dermatol. 1962; 74: 302–306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson D. S. Sulphur sensitivity. Contact Dermatitis 1975; 1: 58
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson D. S., Fregert S., Magnusson B., Bandmann H. J., Calnan C. D., Cronin E., Hjorth N., Maibach H. L., Malten K. E., Meneghini C. L., Pirilä V. Terminology of contact dermatitis. Acta Derm.‐Venereol. 1970; 50: 287–292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson H. T. H. Dermatitis from an acridine dye. Contact Dermatitis Newsl. 1971; 9: 212
   Google Scholar
• Wulf K. Beitrag zur Triamcinolon Kontaktallergie. Z. Haut‐Geschlechtskr. 1967; 42: 765
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wurbach G., Schubert H. Untersuchungen uber Afugin Allergie. Dermatol. Monatsschr. 1976; 162: 317–322
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yaffee H. S., Dressler D. P. Topical application of mafenide acetate. Arch. Dermatol. 1969; 100: 277–281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zackheim H. S. Should therapeutic coal tar preparation be available over‐the‐counter?. Arch. Dermatol. 1978; 114: 126–126
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zackheim H. S. Topical 6‐aminonicotinamide plus oral niacinamide therapy for psoriasis. Arch. Dermatol. 1978; 114: 1632–1638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar