Percutaneous penetration characteristics and release kinetics of contact allergens encapsulated in ethosomes

References

• Karlberg AT, Bergström MA, Börje A, Luthman K, Nilsson JL. Allergic contact dermatitis—formation, structural requirements, and reactivity of skin sensitizers. Chem Res Toxicol 2008; 21(1):53–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen JB, Soerensen JA, Nielsen F. The usual suspects—influence of physicochemical properties on lag time, skin deposition, and percutaneous penetration of nine model compounds. J Toxicol Environ Health A 2009; 72(5):315–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen JB, Nielsen F, Sorensen JA. Defense against dermal exposures is only skin deep: significantly increased penetration through slightly damaged skin. Arch Dermatol Res 2007; 299(9):423–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen JB. Effects of four detergents on the in-vitro barrier function of human skin. Int J Occup Environ Health 2000; 6(2):143–147.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jimbo Y, Ishihara M, Osamura H, Takano M, Ohara M. Influence of vehicles on penetration through human epidermis of benzyl alcohol, isoeugenol and methyl isoeugenol. J Dermatol 1983; 10(3):241–250.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Basketter DA, Gerberick GF, Kimber I. Skin sensitisation, vehicle effects and the local lymph node assay. Food Chem Toxicol 2001; 39(6):621–627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jowsey IR, Clapp CJ, Safford B, Gibbons BT, Basketter DA. The impact of vehicle on the relative potency of skin-sensitizing chemicals in the local lymph node assay. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 2008; 27(2):67–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzulli FN, Maibach HI. Effects of vehicles,and elicitation concentration in contact dermatitis testing. I. Experimental contact sensitization in humans. Contact Dermatitis 1976; 2(6):325–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanglertsampan C, Maibach HI. The role of vehicles in diagnostic patch testing. A reappraisal. Contact Dermatitis 1993; 29(4):169–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen JT, Vogel S, Karlberg A, Simonsson C, Johansen JD, Andersen KE. Ethosome formulation of contact allergens may enhance patch test reactions in patients. Contact Dermatitis 2010; 63(4):209–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen JT, Vogel S, Karlberg AT, Simonsson C, Johansen JD, Andersen KE. Ethosome formulations of known contact allergens can increase their sensitizing capacity. Acta Derm Venereol 2010; 90(4):374–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godin B, Touitou E. Ethosomes: new prospects in transdermal delivery. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst 2003; 20(1):63–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touitou E, Dayan N, Bergelson L, Godin B, Eliaz M. Ethosomes—novel vesicular carriers for enhanced delivery: characterization and skin penetration properties. J Controlled Release 2000; 65(3):403–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeremans JL, Gerritsen HR, Meusen SP, Mijnheer FW, Gangaram Panday RS, Prevost R, et al. The preparation of tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) containing liposomes: entrapment efficiency and ultracentrifugation damage. J Drug Target 1995; 3(4):301–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basketter DA, Lea LJ, Dickens A, Briggs D, Pate I, Dearman RJ, et al. A comparison of statistical approaches to the derivation of EC3 values from local lymph node assay dose responses. J Appl Toxicol 1999; 19(4):261–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen KE, Carlsen L, Egsgaard H, Larsen E. Contact sensitivity and bioavailability of chlorocresol. Contact Dermatitis 1985; 13(4):246–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heylings JR, Clowes HM, Cumberbatch M, Dearman RJ, Fielding I, Hilton J, et al. Sensitization to 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene: influence of vehicle on absorption and lymph node activation. Toxicology 1996; 109(1):57–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendlington RU, Minter HJ, Stupart L, MacKay C, Roper CS, Sanders DJ, et al. Development of a modified in vitro skin absorption method to study the epidermal/dermal disposition of a contact allergen in human skin. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 2008; 27(4):283–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelsson K, Simonsson C, Jonsson CA, Westman G, Ericson MB, Karlberg AT. Accumulation of FITC near stratum corneum-visualizing epidermal distribution of a strong sensitizer using two-photon microscopy. Contact Dermatitis 2009; 61(2):91–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts DW, Aptula AO. Determinants of skin sensitisation potential. J Appl Toxicol 2008; 28(3):377–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright ZM, Basketter PA, Blaikie L, Cooper KJ, Warbrick EV, Dearman RJ, et al. Vehicle effects on skin sensitizing potency of four chemicals: assessment using the local lymph node assay. Int J Cosmet Sci 2001; 23(2):75–83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cumberbatch M, Scott RC, Basketter DA, Scholes EW, Hilton J, Dearman RJ, et al. Influence of sodium lauryl sulphate on 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene-induced lymph node activation. Toxicology 1993; 77(1-2):181–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar