The triggering role of allergic contact dermatitis in discoid lupus erythematosus

References

• Kuhn A, Richter-Hintz D, Oslislo C, et al. Lupus erythematosus tumidus- a neglected subset of cutaneous lupus erythematosus: report of 40 cases. Arch Dermatol 2000;136:1033–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalunian KC. Definition, classification, activity and damage indices. In: Wallace DJ, Hahn BD, eds. Dubois’ lupus erythematosus. 5th ed. Baltimore (MD): Williams & Wilkins; 1997:19–29
   Google Scholar
• Provost TT. The relationship between discoid and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arch Dermatol 1994;130:1308–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan EM, Cohen AS, Fries JF, et al. The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of sysytemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1982;25:1271–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petri M. Review of classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2005;31:245–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callen JP. Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: a personal approach to management. Australas J Dermatol 2006;47:13–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueki H. Koebner phenomenon in lupus erythematosus. Hautarzt 1994;45:154–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuran M, Clemmensen O, Andersen KE. Contact lupus erythematosus. Contact Dermatitis 2000;43:169–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stransky L, Bardarov E. Contact lupus erythematosus? Contact Dermatitis 1998; 39:37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trindade MA, Alchorne AO, da Costa EB, et al. Eyelid discoid lupus erythematosus and contact dermatitis: a case report. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2004;18:577–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett JH. Discoid lupus erythematosus exacerbated by contact dermatitis. Cutis 1990;46:430–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimaoka Y, Hatamochi A, Hamasaki Y, et al. Discoid lupus erythematosus exacerbated by contact dermatitis caused by use of squaric acid dibutylester for topical immunotherapy in a patient with alopecia areata. J Dermatol 2008;35:151–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goossens A. Art and science of patch testing. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2007;73:289–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis M, Scalf L, Yiannias J, et al. Changing trends and allergens in the patch test standart series. Arch Dermatol 2008;144:67–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin JH. Pathophysiology of cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Clinic Rev Allerg Immunol 2007;33:85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köbner H. Zur aetiologie der psoriasis. Vjschr Dermatol Syph 1876;8:559–61
   Google Scholar
• King-Smith D. External irritation as a factor in the causation of lupus erythematosus discoides. Arch Dermatol 1926;14:547–9
   Google Scholar
• Kern AB, Schiff BL. Discoid lupus erythematosus following trauma. Arch Dermatol 1957;75:685–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodin H. Discoid lupus erythematosus and trauma. Acta Dermatovener 1963;43:142–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirgüneş FE, Evans S, Boztepe G, et al. Deri yama testi: daha az madde içeren ön yama testi serisi daha pratik olabilir mi? Deri Hastalıkları ve Frengi Arşivi 2007;41:7–10.
   Google Scholar
• Önder M, Adışen E. Patch test results in a Turkish pediatric population. Contact Dermatitis 2008;58:63–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks JG, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for the detection of delayed- type hypersensitivity to topical allergens. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998;38:911–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajaj AK, Saraswat A, Mukhija G, et al. Patch testing experience with 1000 patients. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2007;73:313–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert MR, Chang Y, Gonzalez E. Concominant positive reactions to allergens in a patch testing standard series from 1988–1997. Am J Contact Dermat 1999;10:219–23
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wetter DA, Davis MD, Yiannias JA, et al. Patch test results from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 1998–2000. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005;53:416–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akasya-Hillenbrand E, Özkaya-Bayazıt E. Patch test results in 542 patients with suspected contact dermatitis in Turkey. Contact Dermatitis 2002;46:17–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uehera M, Sawai T. A longitudinal study of contact sensitivity in patients with atopic dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 1989;125:366–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shum KW, Meyer JD, Chen Y, et al. Occupational contact dermatitis to nickel: experience of the British dermatologists (EPIDERM) and occupational physicians (OPRA) surveillance schemes. Occup Environ Med 2003;60:954–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnuch A, Geier J, Uter W. National rates and regional differences in sensitization to allergens of the standard series. Contact Dermatitis 1997;37:200–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rystedt I, Fischer T. Relationship between nickel and cobalt sensitization in hard metal workers. Contact Dermatitis 1983;9:195–200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodi A, Mancini LL, Ambonati M, et al. Epidemiology of occupational contact dermatitis in a North Italian population. Eur J Dermatol 2000;10:128–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvholm MA. Preservatives in registered chemical products. Contact Dermatitis 2005;53:27–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biebl KA, Warshaw EM. Allergic contact dermatitis to cosmetics. Dermatol Clin 2006;24:215–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar