Prediction of eye irritation potential of liquid and granular laundry detergent formulas using the bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay

References

• Rogiers V, Pauwels M. Safety assessment of cosmetic ingredients present in technical information files of finished products. Curr Probl Dermatol 2008;36:94–114
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• OECD. Acute Eye Irritation/Corrosion: OECD Guidelines for the Testing on Chemicals No. 405. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development; 2002:1–14
   Google Scholar
• Curren RD, Harbell JW. Ocular safety: a silent (in vitro) success story. Altern Lab Anim 2002;30:69–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curren R, Evans M, Raabe H, et al. An histological analysis of damage to bovine corneas in vitro by selected ocular toxicants. Toxicologist 2000;54:188
   Google Scholar
• Cater KC, Harbell JW. Prediction of eye irritation potential of surfactant-based rinse-off personal care formulations by the bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 2006;25:217–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cater KC, Harbell JW. Comparison of in vitro eye irritation potential by bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay to erythema scores in human eye sting test of surfactant-based formulations. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 2008;27:77–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jester JV, Li HF, Petroll WM, et al. Area and depth of surfactant-induced corneal injury correlates with cell death. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998;39:922–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jester JV. Extent of corneal injury as a biomarker for hazard assessment and the development of alternative models to the Draize rabbit eye test. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 2006;25:41–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillman MR. Skin and eye testing in animals. In: Hayes AW, ed. Principles and methods of toxicology. New York: Raven Press; 1982:209–22
   Google Scholar
• Gettings SD, Lordo RA, Hintze KL, et al. The CTFA Evaluation of Alternatives Program: an evaluation of in vitro alternatives to the Draize primary eye irritation test. (Phase III) surfactant-based formulations. Food Chem Toxicol 1996;34:79–117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sina JF, Galer DM, Sussman RG, et al. A collaborative evaluation of seven alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test using pharmaceutical intermediates. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1995;26:20–31
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bagley DM, Booman KA, Bruner L, et al. The SDA program phase III: comparison of in vitro data with animal eye irritation data on solvents. surfactants, oxidizing agents, and prototype cleaning products. J Toxicol Cutan Ocul Toxicol 1994;13:127–55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams JB, Taber D. Assessing detergent safety: A comparison of a nonphosphate laundry detergent with phosphate detergents. J Am Oil Chem Soc 1972;49:539–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuellar N, Lloyd PH, Swanson JE, et al. Evaluating the eye irritancy of solvents in a simple fragrance mixture with the bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay. Toxicologist 2003;72:312
   Google Scholar
• Nash JR, Curren R, Hanlon E, et al. Histological evaluation of the effects of transport on bovine corneas for ocular safety testing. Toxicologist 2009;108:382–3
   Google Scholar
• OECD. Bovine corneal opacity and permeability test method for identifying ocular corrosives and severe irritants: OECD Guideline for testing of chemicals. No. 437. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development; 2009:1–18
   Google Scholar
• Sina JF, Gautheron P. Report from the Bovine Opaicity and Permeability Assay Technical Workshop November 3–4, (1997). An historical perspective. In Vitro Mol Biol 1998;11:316–26
   Google Scholar
• Heitfield F, Harbell J. Correlation of the bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay with the rabbit Draize eye irritation assay using traditional histopathological endpoints. Toxicologist 1999;48:336
   Google Scholar
• Harbell J, Mun G, Curren R. Application of histological evaluation to enhance the bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay. Toxicologist 2006;90:326
   Google Scholar
• Scott L, Eskes C, Hoffmann S, et al. Bottom-up and top-down approach: Eye irritation testing strategy to reduce and replace in vivo studies. Toxicology In Vitro 2010;24:1–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer JK, Parker RD, Jester JV. Extent of initial corneal injury as the mechanistic basis for ocular irritation: key findings and recommendations for the development of alternative assays. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2002;36:106–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jester JV, Maurer JK, Petroll WM, et al. Application of in vivo confocal microscopy to the understanding of surfactant-induced ocular irritation. Toxicol Pathol 1996;24:412–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jester JV, Li L, Molai A, et al. Extent of initial corneal injury as a basis for alternative eye irritation tests. Toxicol In Vitro 2001;15:115–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer JK, Parker RD, Petroll WM, et al. Quantitative measurement of acute corneal injury in rabbits with surfactants of different type and irritancy. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1999;158:61–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jester JV, Barry PA, Lind GL, et al. Corneal keratocytes: in situ and in vitro organization of cytoskeletal contractile proteins. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994;39:922–36
   Google Scholar
• Jester JV, Ling J, Harbell J. Measuring depth of injury (DOI) in an isolated rabbit eye irritation test (IRE) using biomarkers of cell death and viability. Toxicol In Vitro 2010;24:597–604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jester JV, Petroll WM, Bean J, et al. Area and depth of surfactant-induced corneal injury predicts extent of subsequent ocular responses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:2610–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kangas TA, Edelhauser HF, Twinging SS, et al. Loss of stromal glycosaminoglycans during corneal edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990;31:1994–2002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson SE, Mohan RR, Mohan R, et al. The corneal wound healing response:cytokine-mediated interaction of the the epithelium, stroma and inflammatory cells. Prog Retin Eye Res 2001;20:625–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper KJ, Earl LK, Harbell J, et al. Prediction of ocular irritancy of prototype shampoo formulations by the isolated rabbit eye (IRE) test and bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay. Toxicol In Vitro 2001;15:95–103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson JE, Lake LK, Donnelly TA, et al. Prediction of ocular irritation of full-strength cleaners and strippers by tissue equivalent and bovine corneal assays. J Toxicol Cutan Ocul Toxicol 1995;14:179–95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuellar N, Lloyd PH, Swanson JE, et al. Phase two: Evaluating the eye irritancy of solvents in a simple fragrance mixture with the bovine opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay. Toxicologist 2004;78:268
   Google Scholar
• Balls M, Berg N, Bruner L, et al. Eye irritation testing: the way forward. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 34. Altern Lab Anim 1999;27:53–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuang V. The neutral red release assay: a review. Altern Lab Anim 2001;29:575–99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rispin A, Stitzel K, Harbell J, et al. Ensuring quality of in vitro alternative test methods: current practice. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2006;45:97–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar