References
- Muller SA. Climate change, dermatology and ecosystem services; trends and trade-offs. Int J Dermatol 2011;50:504–507
- Misery L, Boussetta S, Nocera T, et al. Sensitive skin in Europe. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2009;23:376–381
- Guinot C, Malvy D, Mauger E, et al. Self-reported skin sensitivity in a general adult population in France: data of the SU.VI.MAX cohort. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2006;20:380–390
- Misery L, Sibaud V, Merial-Kieny C, et al. Sensitive skin in the American population: prevalence, clinical data, and role of the dermatologist. Int J Dermatol 2011; 50:961–967
- Willis CM, Shaw S, De Lacharrière O, et al. Sensitive skin: an epidemiological study. Br J Dermatol 2001;145:258–263
- Seidenari S, Francomano M, Mantovani L. Baseline biophysical parameters in subjects with sensitive skin. Contact Dermatitis 1998;38:311–315
- Primavera G, Berardesca E. Sensitive skin: mechanisms and diagnosis. Int J Cosmet Sci 2005;27:1–10
- De Paepe K, Houben E, Adam R, et al. Effects on the Nasolabial Skin Condition. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2009;22:8–14
- Farage MA. Perceptions of sensitive skin: changes in perceived severity and associations with environmental causes. Contact Dermatitis 2008;59:226–232
- Misery L, Myon E, Martin N, et al. Sensitive skin: psychological effects and seasonal changes. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2007;21:620–628
- Xu F, Yan S, Wu M, et al. Self-declared sensitive skin in China: a community-based study in three top metropolises. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2012;27:370–375
- Heft MW, Robinson ME. Age differences in orofacial sensory thresholds. J Dent Res 2010;89:1102–1105
- Robinson MK. Population differences in acute skin irritation responses. Race, sex, age, sensitive skin and repeat subject comparisons. Contact Dermatitis 2002;46:86–93
- Loffler H, Happle R. Influence of climatic conditions on the irritant patch test with sodium lauryl sulphate. Acta Derm Venereol 2003;83:338–341
- Serup J. EEMCO guidance for the assessment of dry skin (xerosis) and ichthyosis: clinical scoring systems. Skin Res Technol 1995;1:109–114
- Rogiers V, EEMCO Group. EEMCO guidance for the assessment of transepidermal water loss in cosmetic sciences. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol 2001;14:117–128
- Berardesca E, Farage M, Maibach H. Sensitive skin: an overview. Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35:2–8
- Basketter DA, Griffiths HA, Wang XM, et al. Individual, ethnic and seasonal variability in irritant susceptibility of skin: the implications for a predictive human patch test. Contact Dermatitis 1996;35:208–213
- Thorleifsson A, Wulf HC. Emollients and the response of facial skin to a cold environment. Br J Dermatol 2003;148:1149–1152
- Zoe Diana Draelos. Cosmetic selection in the sensitive-skin patient. Dermatologic Therapy 2001;14:194–199
- Ohta M, Hikima R, Ogawa T. Physiological characteristics of sensitive skin classified by stinging test. J Cosmet Sci Jpn 2000;23:163–167
- An S, Lee E, Kim S, et al. Comparison and correlation between stinging responses to lactic acid and bioengineering parameters. Contact Dermatitis 2007;57:158–162
- Kikuchi K, Kobayashi H, Hirao T, et al. Improvement of mild inflammatory changes of the facial skin induced by winter environment with daily applications of a moisturizing cream. A half-side test of biophysical skin parameters, cytokine expression pattern and the formation of cornified envelope. Dermatology 2003;207:269–275
- Black D, Del Pozo A, Lagarde JM, et al. Seasonal variability in the biophysical properties of stratum corneum from different anatomical sites. Skin Res Technol 2000;6:70–76
- Rohr M, Schrader K. Climatic influence on cosmetic skin parameters. Curr Probl Dermatol 1998;26:151–164