367
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Who is smoking pot for fun and who is not? An overview of instruments to screen for cannabis-related problems in general population surveys

Pages 410-428 | Received 28 Sep 2011, Accepted 26 Sep 2012, Published online: 05 Nov 2012

References

  • ADAI (2011). Substance use screening & assessment instruments database. Retrieved from http://lib.adai.washington.edu/instruments/
  • Adamson SJ, Sellman JD. A prototype screening instrument for cannabis use disorder: The Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test (CUDIT) in an alcohol-dependent clinical sample. Drug and Alcohol Review 2003; 22: 309–315
  • Annaheim B, Rehm J, Gmel G. How to screen for problematic cannabis use in population surveys. An evaluation of the Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test (CUDIT) in a Swiss sample of adolescents and young adults. European Addiction Research 2008; 14: 190–197
  • Annaheim B, Scotto TJ, Gmel G. Revising the Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test (CUDIT) by means of item response theory. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 2010; 19: 142–155
  • Babor TF. The diagnosis of cannabis dependence. Cannabis dependence: Its nature, consequences, and treatment, R.A. Roffman, R.S. Stephens. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2006; 21–36
  • Bashford, J. (2010). Screening and assessment for cannabis use disorders. Guidelines’ Background Papers. Retrieved from http://ncpic.org.au/static/pdfs/background-papers/screening-and-assessment-for-cannabis-use-disorders.pdf
  • Bashford J, Flett R, Copeland J. The Cannabis Use Problems Identification Test (CUPIT): Development, reliability, concurrent and predictive validity among adolescents and adults. Addiction 2010; 105: 615–625
  • Bastiaens L, Francis G, Lewis K. The RAFFT as a screening tool for adolescent substance use disorders. American Journal of Addictions 2000; 9: 10–16
  • Bastiaens L, Riccardi K, Sakhrani D. The RAFFT as a screening tool for adult substance use disorders. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 2002; 28: 681–691
  • Beck F, Legleye S. Measuring cannabis related problems and dependence at the population level. A cannabis reader: Global issues and local experiences , European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA), Lisbon 2008; 2: 29–57
  • Bernard M, Bolognini M, Plancherel B, Chinet L, Laget J, Stephan P, Halfon O, et al. French validity of two substance-use screening tests among adolescents: A comparison of the CRAFFT and DEP-ADO. Journal of Substance Use 2005; 10: 385–395
  • Bernstein E, Edwards E, Dorfman D, Heeren T, Bliss C, Bernstein J. Screening and brief intervention to reduce marijuana use among youth and young adults in a pediatric emergency department. Academic Emergency Medicine 2009; 16: 1174–1185
  • Blanchard KA, Morgenstern J, Morgan TJ, Lobouvie EW, Bux DA. Assessing consequences of substance use: Psychometric properties of the inventory of drug use consequences. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 2003; 17: 328–331
  • Brown RL, Rounds LA. Conjoint screening questionnaires for alcohol and other drug abuse: Criterion validity in a primary care practice. Wisconsin Medical Journal 1995; 94: 135–140
  • Cohen PDA, Kaal HL. The irrelevance of drug policy. Patterns and careers of experienced cannabis use in the populations of Amsterdam, San Francisco and Bremen. CEDRO, Amsterdam 2001; 2008
  • Copeland J, Gilmour S, Gates P, Swift W. The cannabis problems questionnaire: Factor structure, reliability, and validity. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2005; 80: 313–319
  • Cortina JM. What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology 1993; 78: 98–104
  • Costes J-M, Reynaud-Maurupt C. Les “habitués” du cannabis. Les Usages de Drogues Illicte en France Depuis 1999. Vus au Travers du Dispositif TREND, J.-M. Costes. Oberservatoire Français des Drogues et des Toxicomanies (OFDT), Paris 2010; 73–82
  • Cottler LB. Composite international diagnostic interview – Substance abuse module (SAM). Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 2000
  • Cuenca-Royo AM, Sanchez-Niubo A, Forero CG, Torrens M, Suelves JM, Domingo-Salvany A. Psychometric properties of the CAST and SDS scales in young adult cannabis users. Addictive Behaviors 2012; 37: 709–715
  • Drummond DC. The relationship between alcohol dependence and alcohol-related problems in a clinical population. British Journal of Addiction 1990; 85: 357–366
  • EMCDDA (2010a). Screening for problem or dependent cannabis use. Retrieved from http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/html.cfm/index31435EN.html
  • EMCDDA (2010b). Evaluation Instruments Bank (EIB). Retrieved from http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/eib
  • EMCDDA (2012). 2011 Annual report on the state of the drugs problem in Europe. Retrieved from http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/publications/annual-report/2011
  • Ewing JA. Detecting alcoholism. The CAGE questionnaire. JAMA 1984; 252: 1905–1907
  • Farrow JA, Smith WR, Hurst MD. Adolescent drug and alcohol assessment instruments in current use: A critical comparison. Alcohol and Drug Abuse Institute, University of Washington, Washington 1993
  • Fernandez-Artamendi S, Fernandez-Hermida JR, Muniz-Fernandez J, Secades-Villa R, Garcia-Fernandez G. Screening of cannabis-related problems among youth: The CPQ-A-S and CAST questionnaires. Substance Abuse Treatment Prevention and Policy 2012; 7: 13 doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-7-13
  • Ferris J, Templeton L, Wong S. Alcohol, tobacco and marijuana: Use, norms, problems and policy attitudes among Ontario adults (ARF internal document). Addiction Research Foundation, Toronto 1994
  • Gmel G, Heeb J-L, Rehm J. Is frequency of drinking an indicator of problem drinking? A psychometric analysis of a modified version of the alcohol use disorders identification test in Switzerland. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2001; 64: 151–163
  • Gmel G, Rehm J, Room R, Greenfield TK. Dimensions of alcohol-related social and health consequences in survey research. Journal of Substance Abuse 2000; 12: 113–138
  • Gossop M, Darke S, Griffiths P, Hando J, Powis B, Hall W, Strang J, et al. The Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS): Psychometric properties of the SDS in English and Australian samples of heroin, cocaine and amphetamine users. Addiction 1995; 90: 607–614
  • Hall W, Lynskey M. The challenges in developing a rational cannabis policy. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 2009; 22: 258–262
  • Hall W, Solowij N. Adverse effects of cannabis. Lancet 1998; 352: 1611–1616
  • Hammersley R, Leon V. Patterns of cannabis use and positive and negative experiences of use amongst university students. Addiction Research and Theory 2006; 14: 189–205
  • Karila L, Coscas S, Reynaud M. Autoquestionnaires d’évaluation en addictologie. Traité d'addictologie, M. Reynaud. Flammarion, Paris 2006; 236–241
  • Karila L, Legleye S, Beck F, Corruble E, Falissard B, Reynaud M. Validation of a questionnaire to screen for harmful use of alcohol and cannabis in the general population: CRAFFT-ADOSPA. Presse Medicale 2007; 36: 582–590
  • Kedzior KK, Martin-Iverson MT. Concurrent validity of cannabis misuse diagnoses on CIDI-Auto 2.1 in low-level cannabis users from the general population. Australian Journal of Psychology 2007; 59: 169–175
  • Kerssemakers (2000). Know cannabis. Retrieved from http://www.knowcannabis.org.uk/
  • Knight JR, Sherritt L, Harris SK, Gates EC, Chang G. Validity of brief alcohol screening tests among adolescents: A comparison of the AUDIT, POSIT, CAGE, and CRAFFT. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 2003; 27: 67–73
  • Knight JR, Shrier LA, Bravender TD, Farrell M, Vander Bilt J, Shaffer HJ. A new brief screen for adolescent substance abuse. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 1999; 153: 591–596
  • Latimer WW, O'Brien MS, McDouall J, Toussova O, Floyd LJ, Vazquez M. Screening for ‘substance abuse’ among school-based youth in Mexico using the Problem Oriented Screening Instrument (POSIT) for teenagers. Substance Use and Misuse 2004; 39: 307–329
  • Legleye S, Karila L, Beck F, Reynaud M. Validation of the CAST, a general population Cannabis Abuse Screening Test. Journal of Substance Use 2007; 12: 233–242
  • Martin G, Copeland J, Gates P, Gilmour S. The Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS) in an adolescent population of cannabis users: Reliability, validity and diagnostic cut-off. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2006; 83: 90–93
  • Martin G, Copeland J, Gilmour S, Gates P, Swift W. The Adolescent Cannabis Problems Questionnaire (CPQ-A): Psychometric properties. Addictive Behaviors 2006; 31: 2238–2248
  • McPherson TL, Hersch RK. Brief substance use screening instruments for primary care settings: A review. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2000; 18: 193–202
  • Moberg P, Hahn L. The adolescent drug involvement scale. Journal of Adolescent Chemical Dependency 1991; 2: 75–88
  • Okuda M, Hasin DS, Olfson M, Khan SS, Nunes EV, Montoya I, Blanco C, et al. Generalizability of clinical trials for cannabis dependence to community samples. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2010; 111: 177–181
  • Okulicz-Kozaryn K, Sieroslawski J. Ocena psychometrycznych wlasciwosci testu ‘Problemowe uzywanie marihuany’ (PUM) dla dorastajacych. [Psychometric Properties of the Problematic Marijuana Use (PUM) Test for adolescents]. Postępy Neurologii, Neurochirurgii, i Psychiatrii 2007; 16: 105–111
  • Parker H. Normalization as a barometer: Recreational drug use and the consumption of leisure by younger Britons. Addiction Research and Theory 2005; 13: 205–215
  • Piontek D, Kraus L, Klempova D. Short scales to assess cannabis-related problems: A review of psychometric properties. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 2008; 3: 25 doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-3-25
  • Piontek D, Kraus L, Pabst A. The ESPAD cannabis module. Cannabis-related problems among adolescents in 17 ESPAD countries. The 2007 ESPAD Report. Substance Use Among Students in 35 European Countries , B. Hibell, U. Guttormsson, S. Ahlström, O. Balakireva, T. Bjarnason, A. Kokkevi, L. Kraus. The Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and Other Drugs (CAN), Stockholm 2009; 2011: 164–170
  • Piontek D, Kraus L, Legleye S, Bühringer G. The validity of DSM-IV cannabis abuse and dependence criteria in adolescents and the value of additional cannabis use indicators. Addiction 2011; 106: 1137–1145
  • pnsd. Consumo problemático de cannabis en estudiantes españoles de 14-18 años: Validación de escalas. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, Madrid 2009
  • Proudfoot H, Vogl L, Swift W, Martin G, Copeland J. Development of a short cannabis problems questionnaire for adolescents in the community. Addictive Behaviors 2010; 35: 734–737
  • Rahdert, E.R. (Ed.). (1991). Adolescent assessment referral system manual. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA).
  • Reynaud M. Usage nocif de substances psychoactives. La Documentation française, Paris 2002
  • Room R, Fischer B, Hall W, Lenton S, Reuter P. The global cannabis commission report. Cannabis policy: Moving beyond stalemate. Beckley Foundation, Oxford 2008
  • Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Grant M. Development of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption-II. Addiction 1993; 88: 791–804
  • Selzer ML. The Michigan alcoholism screening test: The quest for a new diagnostic instrument. American Journal of Psychiatry 1971; 127: 1653–1658
  • Soellner R. Cannabiskonsum und psychosoziale Gesundheit. Huber Verlag, Bern 2000
  • Steiner S, Baumeister SE, Kraus L. Severity of dependence scale – Establishing a cut-off point for cannabis dependence in the German adult population. Sucht 2008; 54: 57–63
  • Stephens RS, Roffman RA. Assessment of cannabis use disorders. Assessment of addictive behaviors, D.M. Donovan, G.A. Marlatt. The Guilford Press, New York, NY 2005; 248–273
  • Stephens RS, Babor TF, Kadden R, Miller M. The marijuana treatment project: Rationale, design and participant characteristics. Addiction 2002; 97: 109–124
  • Stephens RS, Roffman RA, Curtin L. Comparison of extended versus brief treatments for marijuana use. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2000; 68: 898–908
  • Svanum S, McGrew J. Prospective screening of substance dependence: The advantages of directness. Addictive Behaviors 1995; 20: 205–213
  • Tonigan JS, Miller WR. The inventory of drug use consequences (InDUC): Test–retest stability and sensitivity to detect change. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 2002; 16: 165–168
  • WHO (2010). Harmful use. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/terminology/definition2/en/index.html
  • Winters KC, Stinchfield RD. Current issues and future needs in the assessment of adolescent drug abuse. NIDA Research Monograph 1995; 156: 146–171
  • Winters KC, Zenilman J. Simple screening instrument for outreach for alcohol and other drug abuse and infectious diseases (Vol. 11 Publication number SMA 02-3683). Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, US Department of Health and Human Services (SAMHSA), Rockville, MD 1994
  • Zeisser C, Thompson K, Stockwell T, Duff C, Chow C, Vallance K, , Lucas P, et al. A ‘standard joint’? The role of quantity in predicting cannabis-related problems. Addiction Research and Theory 2012; 20: 82–92

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.