Application of a quantitative weight of evidence approach for ranking and prioritising occupational exposure scenarios for titanium dioxide and carbon nanomaterials

References

• Aitken RA, Bassan A, Friedrichs S, Hankin SM, Hansen SF, Holmqvist J, et al. 2011. Specific advice on exposure assessment and hazard/risk characterisation for nanomaterials under REACH (RIP-oN 3) – final project report. Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• BCC Research. 2006. The global market for fullerenes. Wellesley, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Bello D, Wardle BL, Yamamoto N, Guzman deVilloria R, Garcia EJ, Hart AJ, et al. 2009. Exposure to nanoscale particles and fibers during machining of hybrid advanced composites containing carbon nanotubes. J Nanopart Res 11(1):231:49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer D, Berges M, Virji MA, Fransman W, Bello D, Hodson L, et al. 2011. Harmonization of measurement strategies for exposure to manufactured nano-objects; report of a workshop. Ann Occup Hyg 56:1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brouwer D, van Duuren-Stuurman B, Berges M, Jankowska E, Bard D, Mark D. 2009. From workplace air measurement results toward estimates of exposure? Development of a strategy to assess exposure to manufactured nano-objects. J Nanopart Res 11:1867–1881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer DH. 2012. Control banding approaches for nanomaterials. Ann Occup Hyg 56:506–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer DH, Gijsbers JHJ, Lurvink MWM. 2004. Personal exposure to ultrafine particles in the workplace: exploring sampling techniques and strategies. Ann Occup Hyg 48:439–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen HHC, Yu C, Ueng TH, Chen S, Chen BJ, Huang KJ, et al. 1998. Acute and subacute toxicity study of water-soluble polyalkylsulfonated C60 in rats. Toxicol Pathol 26:143–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson K, Murphy F, Duffin R, Poland C. 2010. Asbestos, carbon nanotubes and the pleural mesothelium: a review of the hypothesis regarding the role of long fibre retention in the parietal pleura, inflammation and mesothelioma. Part Fibre Toxicol 7:5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duuren-Stuurman B, Vink S, Brouwer D, Kroese D, Heussen H, Verbist K, et al. 2011. Stoffenmanager nano: description of the conceptual control banding model. Zeist, Netherlands: Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO).
   Google Scholar
• EEA. 2001. Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896–2000. Copenhagen: European Environmental Agency.
   Google Scholar
• European Chemicals Agency. 2007. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Part D: exposure scenario building. Helsinki, Finland: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA).
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and the Council. 2006. Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH). Brussels, Belgium: Official Journal of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Fairman R, Mead CD, Williams WP. 1998. Environmental risk assessment: approaches, experiences and information sources. Copenhagen: European Environmental Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Fransman W, Cherrie J, Tongeren Mv, Schneider T, Tischer M, Schinkel J, et al. 2009. Development of a mechanistic model for the Advanced REACH Tool (ART). Zeist, Netherlands: Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO).
   Google Scholar
• Fraser TWK, Reinardy HC, Shaw BJ, Henry TB, Handy RD. 2010. Dietary toxicity of single-walled carbon nanotubes and fullerenes (C60) in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Nanotoxicology 5:98–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen S, Michelson E, Kamper A, Borling P, Stuer-Lauridsen F, Baun A. 2008. Categorization framework to aid exposure assessment of nanomaterials in consumer products. Ecotoxicology 17:438–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höck J, Epprecht T, Hofmann H, Höhner K, Krug H, Lorenz C, et al. 2010. Guidelines on the precautionary matrix for syntheticnanomaterials. Berne: Federal Office of Public Health and Federal Office for the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Hristozov D, Malsch I. 2009. Hazards and risks of engineered nanoparticles for the environment and human health. Sustainability 1:1161–1194.
   Google Scholar
• Innovative Research and Products. 2011. Production and applications of carbon nanotubes, carbon nanofibers, fullerenes, graphene and nanodiamonds: a global technology survey and market analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Koehler AR, Som C. 2008. Environmental and health implications of nanotechnology - have innovators learned the lessons from past experiences? Hum Ecol Risk Assess 14:512–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koponen IK, Jensen KA, Schneider T. 2011. Comparison of dust released from sanding conventional and nanoparticle-doped wall and wood coatings. J Expos Sci Environ Epidemiol 21:408–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlbusch T, Asbach C, Fissan H, Gohler D, Stintz M. 2011. Nanoparticle exposure at nanotechnology workplaces: a review. Part Fibre Toxicol 8:22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linkov I, Loney D, Cormier S, Satterstrom FK, Bridges T. 2009. Weight-of-evidence evaluation in environmental assessment: review of qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sci Total Environ 407:5199–5205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linkov I, Satterstrom F, Steevens J, Ferguson E, Pleus R. 2007. Multi-criteria decision analysis and environmental risk assessment for nanomaterials. J Nanopart Res 9:543–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linkov I, Welle P, Loney D, Tkachuk A, Canis L, Kim JB, et al. 2011. Use of multicriteria decision analysis to support weight of evidence evaluation. Risk Anal 31(8):1211–1225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard AD, Aitken RJ. 2007. Assessing exposure to airborne nanomaterials: current abilities and future requirements. Nanotoxicology 1:26–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzie C, Henning M, Cura J, Finkelstein K, Gentile J, Maughan J, et al. 1996. Special report of the massachusetts weight-of-evidence workgroup: a weight-of-evidence approach for evaluating ecological risks. Hum Ecol Risk Assessmet 2:277–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardo M, Saisana M, Saltelli A, Tarantola S. 2005. Tools for composite indicators building. Ispra, Italy: Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen, European Commission Joint Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• NRC/NAS. 1983. Risk assessment in the federal government: managing the process. Washington, DC: National Research Council of the National Academy of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Oberdörster E, Zhu S, Blickley TM, McClellan-Green P, Haasch ML. 2006. Ecotoxicology of carbon-based engineered nanoparticles: effects of fullerene (C60) on aquatic organisms. Carbon 44:1112–1120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2003. Description of selected key generic terms used in chemical hazard/risk assessment. Joint project with the international programme on chemical safety (IPCS) on the harmonization of hazard/risk assessment terminology. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ogami A, Yamamoto K, Morimoto Y, Fujita K, Hirohashi M, Oyabu T, et al. 2011. Pathological features of rat lung following inhalation and intratracheal instillation of C60 fullerene. Inhal Toxicol 23:407–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ono-Ogasawara M, Serita F, Takaya M. 2009. Distinguishing nanomaterial particles from background airborne particulate matter for quantitative exposure assessment. J Nanopart Res 11:1651–1659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paik SY, Zalk DM, Swuste P. 2008. Application of a pilot control banding tool for risk level assessment and control of nanoparticle exposures. Ann Occup Hyg 52:419–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poland CA, Duffin R, Kinloch I, Maynard A, Wallace WAH, Seaton A, et al. 2008. Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study. Nat Nano 3:423–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robichaud C, Tanzil D, Weilenmann U, Wiesner M. 2010. Relative risk analysis of several 947 manufactured nanomaterials: an insurance industry context. Environ Sci Technol 39:8985–8994.
   Google Scholar
• Saitoh Y, Xiao L, Mizuno H, Kato S, Aoshima H, Taira H, et al. 2010. Novel polyhydroxylated fullerene suppresses intracellular oxidative stress together with repression of intracellular lipid accumulation during the differentiation of OP9 preadipocytes into adipocytes. Free Radic Res 44:1072–1081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider T, Jensen K. 2009. Relevance of aerosol dynamics and dustiness for personal exposure to manufactured nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res 11:1637–1650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone V, Hankin S, Aitken R, Achberger K, Baun A, Christensen F, et al. 2009. Engineered nanoparticles: review of health and environmental safety (ENRHES). Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Tervonen T, Linkov I, Figueira J, Steevens J, Chappell M, Merad M. 2009. Risk-based classification system of nanomaterials. J Nanopart Res 11:757–766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tielemans E, Schneider T, Goede H, Tischer M, Warren N, Kromhout H, et al. 2008. Conceptual model for assessment of inhalation exposure: defining modifying factors. Ann Occup Hyg 52:577–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tielemans E, Warren N, Fransman W, Van Tongeren M, Mcnally K, Tischer M, et al. 2011. Advanced Reach Tool (ART): overview of version 1.0 and research needs. Ann Occup Hyg 55:949–956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Congress. 1976. Toxic substances control act (TSCA). Washington, US: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.
   Google Scholar
• US EPA. 1989. Risk assessment guidance for superfund. Vol. I. Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part A). Washington, D.C: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response.
   Google Scholar
• Vorbau M, Hillemann L, Stintz M. 2009. Method for the characterization of the abrasion induced nanoparticle release into air from surface coatings. J Aerosol Sci 40:209–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar