Increasing risk of revision due to deep infection after hip arthroplasty

References

• Anderson DJ, Sexton DJ, Kanafani ZA, Auten G, Kaye KS. Severe surgical site infection in community hospitals: epidemiology, key procedures, and the changing prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007; 28:1047-53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthursson AJ, Furnes O, Espehaug B, Havelin LI, Soreide JA. Validation of data in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register and the Norwegian Patient Register: 5,134 primary total hip arthroplasties and revisions operated at a single hospital between 1987 and 2003. Acta Orthop 2005; 76:823-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block JE, Stubbs HA. Reducing the risk of deep wound infection in primary joint arthroplasty with antibiotic bone cement. Orthopedics 2005; 28:1334-45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnley J. Postoperative infection after total hip replacement with special reference to air contamination in the operating room. Clin Orthop 1972; (87):167-87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempsey KE, Riggio MP, Lennon A, Hannah VE, Ramage G, Allan D, Bagg J. Identification of bacteria on the surface of clinically infected and non-infected prosthetic hip joints removed during revision arthroplasties by 16S rRNA gene sequencing and by microbiological culture. Arthritis Res Ther 2007; 9:R46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engesaeter LB, Lie SA, Espehaug B, Furnes O, Vollset SE, Havelin LI. Antibiotic prophylaxis in total hip arthroplasty: effects of antibiotic prophylaxis systemically and in bone cement on the revision rate of 22,170 primary hip replacements followed 0-14 years in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand 2003; 74:644-51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engesaeter LB, Espehaug B, Lie SA, Furnes O, Havelin LI. Does cement increase the risk of infection in primary total hip arthroplasty? Revision rates in 56,275 cemented and uncemented primary THAs followed for 0-16 years in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2006; 77:351-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espehaug B, Furnes O, Havelin LI, Engesaeter LB, Vollset SE, Kindseth O. Registration completeness in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2006; 77:49-56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaine WJ, Ramamohan NA, Hussein NA, Hullin MG, McCreath SW. Wound infection in hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2000; 82:561-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hastie TJ, Tibshirani RJ. Generalized additive models. Chapman & Hall, London 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Havelin I. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register Thesis. 1995. University of Bergen, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Havelin LI, Engesaeter LB, Espehaug B, Furnes O, Lie SA, Vollset SE. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71:337-53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herberts P, Malchau H. Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71:111-21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ince A, Rupp J, Frommelt L, Katzer A, Gille J, Lohr JF. Is “aseptic” loosening of the prosthetic cup after total hip replacement due to nonculturable bacterial pathogens in patients with low-grade infection? Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39:1599-603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtz SM, Lau E, Schmier J, Ong KL, Zhao K, Parvizi J. Infection burden for hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23(7):984-91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannien J, van den HS, Muilwijk J, van den Broek PJ, van Benthem B, Wille JC. Trends in the incidence of surgical site infection in the Netherlands. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008; 29:1132-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moojen DJ, Spijkers SN, Schot CS, Nijhof MW, Vogely HC, Fleer A, Verbout AJ, Castelein RM, Dhert WJ, Schouls LM. Identification of orthopaedic infections using broad-range polymerase chain reaction and reverse line blot hybridization. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2007; 89:1298-305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morscher EW. Failures and successes in total hip replacement--why good ideas may not work. Scand J Surg 2003; 92:113-20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neu HC. Emerging trends in antimicrobial resistance in surgical infections. A review. Eur J Surg Suppl 1994: 7-18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neut D, van der Mei HC, Bulstra SK, Busscher HJ. The role of small-colony variants in failure to diagnose and treat biofilm infections in orthopedics. Acta Orthop 2007; 78:299-308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen MA, Nepple JJ, Riew D, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Mayfield J, Fraser VJ. Risk factors for surgical site infection following orthopaedic spinal operations. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2008; 90:62-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parvizi J, Ghanem E, Steinbrecher J, Hickok N, Barrack R The Changing Organism Profile in Periprosthetic Infection. AAOS 75th Annual Meeting Podium Presentations. 2008a. Ref Type: Abstract.
   Google Scholar
• Parvizi J, Saleh KJ, Ragland PS, Pour AE, Mont MA. Efficacy of antibiotic-impregnated cement in total hip replacement. Acta Orthop 2008b; 79:335-41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips JE, Crane TP, Noy M, Elliott TS, Grimer RJ. The incidence of deep prosthetic infections in a specialist orthopaedic hospital: a 15-year prospective survey. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2006; 88:943-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulido L, Ghanem E, Joshi A, Purtill JJ, Parvizi J. Periprosthetic joint infection: the incidence, timing, and predisposing factors. Clin Orthop 2008; (466):1710-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raad I, Alrahwan A, Rolston K. Staphylococcus epidermidis: emerging resistance and need for alternative agents. Clin Infect Dis 1998; 26:1182-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridgeway S, Wilson J, Charlet A, Kafatos G, Pearson A, Coello R. Infection of the surgical site after arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2005; 87:844-50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Santos Sanches I, Mato R, de Lencastre H, Tomasz A. Patterns of multidrug resistance among methicillin-resistant hospital isolates of coagulase-positive and coagulase-negative staphylococci collected in the international multicenter study RESIST in 1997 and 1998. Microb Drug Resist 2000; 6:199-211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Styers D, Sheehan DJ, Hogan P, Sahm DF. Laboratory-based surveillance of current antimicrobial resistance patterns and trends among Staphylococcus aureus: 2005 status in the United States. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 2006; 5:2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register Annual Report 2008. 2008. Ref Type: Report.
   Google Scholar
• van Kasteren ME, Mannien J, Ott A, Kullberg BJ, de Boer AS, Gyssens IC. Antibiotic prophylaxis and the risk of surgical site infections following total hip arthroplasty: Timely administration is the most important factor. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 7:921-7.
   Google Scholar
• von Eiff C, Arciola CR, Montanaro L, Becker K, Campoccia D. Emerging Staphylococcus species as new pathogens in implant infections. Int J Artif Organs 2006; 29:360-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerli W, Ochsner PE. Management of infection associated with prosthetic joints. Infection 2003; 31:99-108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar