Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Orthopaedica Volume 81, 2010 - Issue 1
Journal homepage
1,874
Views
91
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Outcome of primary resurfacing hip replacement: evaluation of risk factors for early revision

12,093 replacements from the Australian Joint Registry

Gareth H Prosser Perth Orthopaedic Institute, Fremantle Hospital and University of Western Australia
,
Piers J Yates Perth Orthopaedic Institute, Fremantle Hospital and University of Western Australia
,
David J Wood Perth Orthopaedic Institute, Fremantle Hospital and University of Western Australia
,
Stephen E Graves Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement RegistryCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Richard N de Steiger Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry
&
Lisa N Miller Data Management and Analysis Centre, University of Adelaide, Australia
Pages 66-71 | Received 02 Nov 2009, Accepted 29 Dec 2009, Published online: 24 Feb 2010

  • Amstutz HC, Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, LeDuff MJ, Campbell PA, Gruen TA. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: Two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2004; 86:28-39.
  • Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report. Adelaide:AOA; 2009.
  • Back DL, Dalziel R, Young D, Shimmin A. Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings: An independent prospective study of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2005; 87:324-9.
  • Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, LeDuff M, Gruen T, Amstutz HC. Risk factors affecting outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop 2004; (418):87-93.
  • Boerre NR, Bannister GC. Cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 50 years of age: Ten to 18 year results. Clin Orthop 1993; (287):153-9.
  • Callaghan JJ, Forest EE, Sporer SM, Goetz DD, Johnston RC Total hip arthroplasty in the young adult. Clin Orthop 1997; (344:) 257-62.
  • Chandler HP, Reineck FT, Wixson RL, McCarthy JC. Total hip replacement in patients younger than thirty years old: A five-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1981; 63:1426-34.
  • Cornell CN, Salvati EA, Pellicci PM. Long-term follow-up of total hip replacement in patients with osteonecrosis. Orthop Clin North Am 1985; 16:757-69.
  • Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJ. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2004; 86:177-84.
  • Dorr LD, Kane TJ 3rd, Conaty JP. Long-term results of cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients 45 years old or younger: A 16 year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 1994; 9: 453-6.
  • Girard J, Lavigne M, Vendittoli PA, Roy AG. Biomechanical reconstruction of the hip: A randomised study comparing total hip resurfacing and total arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2006; 88:721-6.
  • Grammatopoulos G, Pandit H, Kwon YM, Gundle R, McLardy-Smith P, Beard DJ, Murray D W, Gill HS. Hip resurfacings revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcome. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2009; 91:1019-24.
  • Joshi AB, Porter ML, Trail IA, Long-term results of Charnley low-friction arthroplasty in young patients. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1993; 75:616-23.
  • Kim PR, Beaule RE, Laflamme GY, Dunbar M Causes of early failure in multcentre clinical trial of hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasy (Suppl 1) 2008; 23 (6) :44-9.
  • Mai MT, Schmalzried TP, Dorey FJ, Campbell PA, Amstutz HC. The contribution of frictional torque to loosening at the cement-bone interface in Tharies hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1996; 78:505-11.
  • Mont MA, Seyler TM, Marker DR, Marulanda GA, Delanois RE. Use of metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone and Joint Surg (Am) (Suppl 3) 2006; 88:90-7.
  • Mont MA, Seyler TM, Ragland PS, Starr R, Erhart J, Bhave A. Gait analysis of patients with resurfacing hip arthroplasty compared with hip osteoarthritis and standard total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22(1):100-8.
  • Pollard TC, Baker RP, Eastugh-Waring SJ, Bannister GC. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip: A five to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal on metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2006; 88:592-600.
  • Revell MP, McBryde CW, Bhatnagar S, Pynsent PB, Treacy RB. Metal-on metal hip resurfacing in osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) (Suppl 3) 2006; 88:98-103.
  • Robertsson O, Ranstam J. No bias of ignored bilaterality when analysing the revision risk of knee prostheses: Analysis of a population based sample of 44,590 patients with 55,298 knee prostheses from the national Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2003; 4:1.
  • Saito S, Saito M, Nishina T, Ohzono K, Ono K. Long-term results of total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: A comparison with osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop 1989; (244):198-207.
  • Schmalzried TP, Silva M, delaRosa MA, Choi ES, Fowble VA. Optimizing patients selection and outcomes with total hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop 2005; (441):200-4.
  • Shimmin AJ, Back D. Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: A national review of 50 cases. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2005; 87:463-4.
  • Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register Annual Report 2006.
  • Treacy RBC, McBryde CW, Pynsent PB. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: A minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2005; 87:167-70.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.