4,491
Views
175
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The Harris hip score: Do ceiling effects limit its usefulness in orthopedics?

A systematic review

, , , &
Pages 703-707 | Received 15 Feb 2010, Accepted 03 Jun 2010, Published online: 26 Nov 2010

  • de Groot IB, Reijman M, Terwee CB, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Favejee MM, Roos E, Verhaar JA. Validation of the Dutch version of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009; 17(1):132.
  • Gosens T, Hoefnagels NH, de Vet RC, Dhert WJ, van Langelaan EJ, Bulstra SK, Geesink RG. The “Oxford Heup Score”: the translation and validation of a questionnaire into Dutch to evaluate the results of total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2005; 76(2):204-11.
  • Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1969; 51(4):737-55.
  • Haverkamp D, Sierevelt IN, Bekerom van den MP, Poolman RW, Dijk van CN, Marti RK. The validity of patient satisfaction as single question in outcome measurement of total hip arthroplasty. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 2008; 18(2):145-50.
  • Kirmit L, Karatosun V, Unver B, Bakirhan S, Sen A, Gocen Z. The reliability of hip scoring systems for total hip arthroplasty candidates: assessment by physical therapists. Clin Rehabil 2005; 19(6):659-61.
  • McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 1995; 4 (4): 293-307.
  • Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62(10):1006-12.
  • Ostendorf M, van Stel HF, Buskens E, Schrijvers AJ, Marting LN, Verbout AJ, Dhert WJ. Patient-reported outcome in total hip replacement. A comparison of five instruments of health status. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2004; 86(6):801-8.
  • Poolman RW, Swiontkowski MF, Fairbank JC, Schemitsch EH, Sprague S, de Vet HC. Outcome instruments: rationale for their use. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) (Suppl 3) 2009; 91:41-9.
  • Ragab AA. Validity of self-assessment outcome questionnaires: patient-physician discrepancy in outcome interpretation. Biomed Sci Instrum 2003; 39:579-84.
  • Roorda LD, Jones CA, Waltz M, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM, van der Eijken JW, Willems WJ, Heyligers IC, Voaklander DC, Kelly KD, Suarez-Almazor ME. Satisfactory cross cultural equivalence of the Dutch WOMAC in patients with hip osteoarthritis waiting for arthroplasty. Ann Rheum Dis 2004; 63(1):36-42.
  • Shi HY, Mau LW, Chang JK, Wang JW, Chiu HC. Responsiveness of the Harris Hip Score and the SF-36: five years after total hip arthroplasty. Qual Life Res 2009; 18(8):1053-60.
  • Soderman P, Malchau H. Is the Harris Hip Score system useful to study the outcome of total hip replacement? Clin Orthop 2001; (384): 189-97.
  • Terwee CB, Bot SD, De Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60(1):34-42.
  • Walter SD, Yao X. Effect sizes can be calculated for studies reporting ranges for outcome variables in systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60(8):849-52.
  • Wright JG, Young NL. A comparison of different indices of responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50(3):239-46.