2,601
Views
111
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Statistical analysis of arthroplasty data

II. Guidelines

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 258-267 | Received 27 Mar 2011, Accepted 14 Apr 2011, Published online: 30 May 2011

  • Aalen OO. A linear regression model for the analysis of life times. Stat Med 1989; 8: 907-25.
  • Aalen OO. Further results on the non-parametric linear regression model in survival analysis. Stat Med 1993; 12: 1569-88.
  • Biau DJ, Latouche A, Porcher R. Competing events influence estimated survival probability: when is Kaplan-Meier analysis appropriate? Clin Orthop 2007; (462): 229-33.
  • Bryant D, Havey TC, Roberts R, Guyatt G. How many patients? How many limbs? Analysis of patients or limbs in the orthopaedic literature: A systematic Review. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2006; 88: 41-4.
  • Carriere I, Bouyer J. Choosing marginal or random-effects models for longitudinal binary responses: application to self-reported disability among older persons. BMC Med Res Method 2002; 2:1 5
  • Eskelinen A, Remes V, Helenius I, Pulkkinen P, Nevalainen J, Paavolainen P. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis in younger patients in the Finnish arthroplasty register. 4,661 primary replacements followed for 0-22 years. Acta Orthop 2005; 76: 28-41.
  • Espehaug B, Furnes O, Engesaeter LB, Havelin LI. 18 years of results with cemented primary hip prostheses in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: concerns about some newer implants. Acta Orthop 2009; 80: 402-12.
  • Fine JP, Gray RJ. A proportional hazard model for subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc 1999; 94: 496-509.
  • Gillam MH, Ryan P, Graves SE, Miller LN, deSteinger RN, Salter A. Competing risk survival analyses applied to data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.” Acta Orthop 2010; 81 (5): 548-55.
  • Gjertsen JE, Lie SA, Fevang JM, Havelin LI, Engesæter LB, Vinje T, Furnes O. Total hip replacement after femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. Results of 8,577 fractures reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2007; 78: 491-7.
  • Gooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J, Storer BE. Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. Stat Med 1999; 18: 695-706.
  • Grambsch PM, Therneau TM, Fleming TR. Diagnostic plots to reveal functional form for covariates in multiplicative intensity models. Biometrics 1995; 51: 1469-82.
  • Gray RJ. A class of K-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Ann Statist 1988; 16: 1140-54.
  • Hallan G, Dybvik E, Furnes O, Havelin LI. Metal-backed acetabular components with conventional polyethylene. A review of 9113 primary components with a followup of 20 years. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2010; 92: 196-201.
  • Havelin LI, Espehaug B, Vollset SE, Engesaeter LB. The effect of the type of cement on early revision of Charnley total hip prosthesis. A review of eight thousand five hundred and seventy-nine primaty arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1995a; 77: 1543-50.
  • Havelin LI, Vollset SE, Engesaeter LB. Revision for aseptic loosening of uncemented cups in 4,352 primary total hip prostheses. A report from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand 1995b; 66: 494-500.
  • Havelin LI, Engesaeter LB, Espehaug B, Furnes O, Lie SA, Vollset SE. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71: 337–53.
  • Havelin LI, Espehaug B, Engesaeter LB. The performance of two hydroxyapatite-coated acetabular cups compared with Charnley cups. From the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2002; 84: 839-45.
  • Hoffman EB, Sen PK, Weinberg CR. Within cluster resampling. Biometrika 2001; 88: 1121-34.
  • Hougaard P. Analysis of multivariate survival data. New York: Springer Verlag 2000.
  • Johnsen SP, Sørensen HT, Lucht U, Søballe K, Overgaard S, Pedersen AB. Patient-related predictors of implant failure after primary total hip replacement in the initial, short- and long-terms. A nationwide Danish follow-up study including 36 984 patients J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2006; 88: 1303-8.
  • Klein JP, Andersen PK. Regression modeling of competing risks data based on pseudovalues of the cumulative incidence function. Biometrics 2005; 61: 223-9.
  • Kleinbaum DG, Klein M. Survival analysis. A self-learning text. 2nd edition. Springer: New York 2005.
  • Lagakos SW, Schoenfeld DA. Properties of proportional-hazards score tests under misspecified regression models. Biometrics 1984; 40: 1037-48.
  • Lie SA, Engesaeter LB, Havelin LI, Gjessing HK, Vollset SE. Dependency issues in survival analyses of 55 782 primary hip replacements from 47 355 patients. Stat Med 2004; 23: 3227-40.
  • Malchau H, Herberts P, Eisler T, Garellick G, Soderman P. The Swedish total hip replacement register. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2002; 84S2: 2–20.
  • Marchall EC, Spiegelhalter DJ. Reliability of league tables of in vitro fertilisation clinics: retrospective analysis of live birth rates. Br Med J 1998; 316: 1701-5.
  • Möllenhoff G, Walz M, Muhr G, Rehn J. Doppelseitige Huftgelenken endoprothesen: das Zeitintervall als prognostischer Parameter. Unfallchirurg 1994; 97: 430-4.
  • Putter H, Fiocco M, Geskus RB. Tutorial in biostatistics: competing risks and multi-state models. Stat Med 2007; 26: 2389-430.
  • Ranstam J. Problems in orthopedic research. Dependent observations. Acta Orthop Scand 2002; 73: 447-50.
  • Ranstam J, Wagner P, Robertsson O, Lidgren L. Health-care quality registers. Outcome-oriented ranking of hospitals is unreliable. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2008; 90: 1556-61.
  • Ripatti S, Palmgren J. Estimation of multivariate frailty models using penalized partial likelihood. Biometrics 2000; 56: 1016-22.
  • Robertsson O, Ranstam J. No bias of ignored bilaterality when analyzing the revision risk of knee prostheses: Analysis of a population based sample of 44,590 patients with 55,298 knee prostheses from the national Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. BMC Musculoskel Disorders 2003; 4: 1.
  • Robertsson O, Ranstam J, Lidgren L. Variation in outcome and ranking of hospitals. Analysis from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2006; 77: 487-93.
  • Schemper M. Cox analysis of survival data with non-proportional hazard functions. Statistician 1992; 41: 455-65.
  • Schemper M, Wakounig S, Heinze G. The estimation of average hazard ratios by weighted Cox regression. Stat Med 2009; 28: 2473-89.
  • Schrama JC, Espehaug B, Hallan G, Engesaeter B, Furnes O, Havelin LI, Fevang BT. Risk of revision for infection in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with osteoarthritis: a prospective, population-based study on 108,786 hip and knee joint arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2010; 62: 473-9.
  • Schwarzer G, Schumacher M, Maurer TB, Ochsner PE. Statistical analysis of failure times in total joint replacement. J Clin Epidemiol 2001; 54: 997-1003.
  • Therneau TM, Grambsch PM. Modeling survival data: extending the Cox model. Springer: New York 2000.
  • Visuri T, Turula KB, Pulkkinen P, Nevalainen J. Survivorship of hip prosthesis in primary arthrosis. Influence of bilaterality and interoperative time in 45,000 hip prostheses from the Finnish Endoprosthesis Register. Acta Orthop Scand 2002; 73: 287-90.