Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Orthopaedica Volume 83, 2012 - Issue 2
Journal homepage
2,196
Views
62
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original papers

Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of a self-reported foot and ankle score (SEFAS)

Maria CösterDepartment of Orthopedics, Kalmar Hospital, Kalmar;Department of Clinical Sciences and Orthopaedics, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital in Malmö, Malmö, SwedenCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Magnus K KarlssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Orthopaedics, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital in Malmö, Malmö, Sweden
,
Jan-Åke NilssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Orthopaedics, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital in Malmö, Malmö, Sweden
&
Åke CarlssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Orthopaedics, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital in Malmö, Malmö, Sweden
Pages 197-203 | Received 04 Apr 2011, Accepted 29 Oct 2011, Published online: 08 Feb 2012

  • Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1 (8476): 307-10.
  • Bremander AB, Petersson IF, Roos EM. Validation of the Rheumatoid and Arthritis Outcome Score (RAOS) for the lower extremity. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003; 1: 55.
  • Budiman-Mak E, Conrad KJ, Roach KE. The Foot Function Index: a measure of foot pain and disability. J Clin Epidemiol 1991; 44 (6): 561-70.
  • Button G, Pinney S. A meta-analysis of outcome rating scales in foot and ankle surgery: is there a valid, reliable, and responsive system? Foot Ankle Int 2004; 25 (8): 521-5.
  • Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press, New York. 1978.
  • Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd, 1940.
  • Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1996; 78 (2): 185-90.
  • de Groot IB, Favejee MM, Reijman M, Verhaar J AN, Terwee CB. The Dutch version of the knee injury and osteoarthtitis outcome score: A validation study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2008; 6: 16
  • Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 1997; 35: 1095-108.
  • EuroQol Group. EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol Group. Health Policy 1990;16 (3): 199-208.
  • Goksel Karatepe A, Gunaydin R, Kaya T, Karlibas U, Ozbek G. Validation of the Turkish version of the foot and ankle outcome score. Rheumatol Int 2009; 30 (2): 169-73.
  • Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46 (12): 1417-32.
  • Hosman AH, Mason RB, Hobbs T, Rothwell AG. A New Zealand national joint registry review of 202 total ankle replacements followed for up to 6 years. Acta Orthop 2007; 78 (5): 584-91.
  • Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M. Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 1994; 15 (7): 349-53.
  • Lau JT, Mahomed NM, Schon LC. Results of an Internet survey determining the most frequently used ankle scores by AOFAS members. Foot Ankle Int 2005; 26 (6): 479-82.
  • Liang MH. Evaluating measurement responsiveness. J Rheumatol 1995; 22 (6) : 1191-2.
  • Naal FD, Impellizzeri FM, Rippstein PF. Which are the most frequently used outcome instruments in studies on total ankle arthroplasty? Clin Orthop 2010; (468) (3): 815-26.
  • Patel AA, Donegan D, Albert T. The 36-item short form. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007; 15 (2): 126-34.
  • Richter M, Zech S, Geerling J, Frink M, Knobloch K, Krettek C. A new foot and ankle outcome score: Questionnaire based, subjective, Visual-Analogue-Scale, validated and computerized. Foot and Ankle Surgery 2006; 12 (4): 191-9.
  • Roos EM, Brandsson S, Karlsson J. Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score for ankle ligament reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int 2001; 22 (10): 788-94.
  • Schweikert B, Hahmann H, Leidl R. Validaiton of the Eruoqol questionnaire in cardiac rehabilitation Heart. 2006; 92 (1): 62-7.
  • SooHoo NF, Shuler M, Fleming LL. Evaluation of the validity of the AOFAS Clinical Rating Systems by correlation to the SF-36. Foot Ankle Int 2003; 24 (1): 50-5.
  • Streiner D, Norman G. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their developement and use. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
  • Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware JE, Jr . The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey. I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Soc Sci Med 1995;41( 10): 1349-58.
  • Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, . Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60 (1): 34-42.
  • Trevethan R. Evaluation of two self-referent foot health instruments. Foot (Edinb) 2010; 20 (4): 101-8.
  • Wamper KE, Sierevelt IN, Poolman RW, Bhandari M, Haverkamp D. The Harris hip score: Do ceiling effects limit its usefulness in orthopedics? Acta Orthop 2010; 81 (6): 703-7.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.