1,163
Views
32
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Register studies

Feasibility of 4 patient-reported outcome measures in a registry setting

A cross-sectional study of 6,000 patients from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry

, , &
Pages 321-327 | Received 02 Nov 2011, Accepted 09 Apr 2012, Published online: 20 Aug 2012

  • Baker PN, van der Meulen JH, Lewsey J, Gregg PJ. The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2007; 89: 893-900.
  • Davis AM, Perruccio AV, Canizares M, Hawker GA, Roos EM, Maillefert JF, Lohmander LS. Comparative, validity and responsiveness of the HOOS-PS and KOOS-PS to the WOMAC physical function subscale in total joint replacement for osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009; 17 (7): 843-7.
  • Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1996; 78: 185-90.
  • Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Frost S, Gundle R, Lardy-Smith P, Murray D. Evidence for the validity of a patient-based instrument for assessment of outcome after revision hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2001; 83: 1125-9.
  • Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Churchman D, Verjee-Lorenz A, Clayson D. User Manual for the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) Version 1.0. 2010. Isis Innovation Limited 2010.
  • Devlin NJ, Parkin D, Browne J. Patient-reported outcome measures in the NHS: new methods for analysing and reporting EQ-5D data. Health Econ 2010; 19: 886-905.
  • Dunbar MJ. Subjective outcomes after knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand (Suppl 301) 2001; 72: 1-63.
  • Edwards PJ, Roberts I, Clarke MJ, Diguiseppi C, Wentz R, Kwan I, Cooper R, Felix LM, Pratap S. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;MR000008.
  • Gandhi SK, Salmon JW, Zhao SZ, Lambert BL, Gore PR, Conrad K. Psychometric evaluation of the 12-item short-form health survey (SF-12) in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. Clin Ther 2001; 23: 1080-98.
  • Jansson KA, Granath F. Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) before and after orthopedic surgery. Acta Orthop 2010; 82: 82-9.
  • Linde L. Health-related quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. A comparative validation of selected measurement instruments 2009;Copenhagen, Denmark:Department of Rheumatology, Hvidovre Hospital, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen.
  • Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K, Pandit H, Beard DJ, Carr AJ, Dawson J. The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2007; 89: 1010-4.
  • Naal FD, Sieverding M, Impellizzeri FM, von KF, Mannion AF, Leunig M. Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted German Oxford hip score. Clin Orthop 2009; (467): 952-7.
  • Ostendorf M, van Stel HF, Buskens E, Schrijvers AJ, Marting LN, Verbout AJ, Dhert WJ. Patient-reported outcome in total hip replacement. A comparison of five instruments of health status. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2004; 86: 801-8.
  • Overgaard S. Dansk Hoftealloplastik Register Årsrapport. 2011. 2012; 23-4-0012
  • Paulsen A, Overgaard S, Lauritsen JM. Quality of data entry using single entry, double entry and automated forms processing. An example based on a study of patient-reported outcomes. PLoS ONE 2012; (7):e35087
  • Rolfson O. Patient-reported outcome measures and health-economic aspects of total hip arthroplasty. A study of the Swdish Hip Arthroplasty Register 2010;Institute of Clinical Sciences at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg 10-12-2010
  • Rolfson OM, Rothwell AC, Sedrakyan AM, Chenok K EM, Bohm E B MF, Bozic K JM, Garellick GM. Use of patient-reported outcomes in the context of different levels of data. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) (Suppl 3) 2011; 93: 66-71.
  • Rothwell AG, Hooper GJ, Hobbs A, Frampton CM. An analysis of the Oxford hip and knee scores and their relationship to early joint revision in the New Zealand Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2010; 92: 413-8.
  • Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60: 34-42.
  • The EuroQol Group. EuroQol–a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990; 16: 199-208.
  • Ware J E Jr, Kosinski M, Turner-Bowker DM, Gandek B. How to Score Version 2 of the SF-12 Health Survey (With a Supplement Documenting Version 1). 2002. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorperated.
  • Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A, Erikson P. Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: Report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value in Health 2005; 8: 94-104.
  • Wittrup-Jensen KU, Lauridsen J, Gudex C, Pedersen KM. Generation of a Danish TTO value set for EQ-5D health states. Scand J Public Health 2009; 37: 459-66.