1,036
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Hip

5-year clinical and radiostereometric analysis (RSA) follow-up of 39 CUT femoral neck total hip prostheses in young osteoarthritis patients

, &
Pages 334-341 | Received 09 Jan 2012, Accepted 23 Mar 2012, Published online: 27 Aug 2012

  • Corner JA, Rawoot A, Parmar HV. The thrust plate prosthesis in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the hip. Clinical and radiological outcome with minimum 5-year follow-up. Hip Int 2008; 18 (2):88-94.
  • Decking R, Puhl W, Simon U, Claes LE. Changes in strain distribution of loaded proximal femora caused by different types of cementless femoral stems. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2006; 21 (5):495–501.
  • Decking R, Rokahr C, Zurstegge M, Simon U, Decking J. Maintenance of bone mineral density after implantation of a femoral neck hip prosthesis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008; 31 (9):17.
  • Duijsens AW, Keizer S, Vliet-Vlieland T, Nelissen RG. Resurfacing hip prostheses revisited: failure analysis during a 16-year follow-up. Int Orthop 2005; 29 (4):224–8.
  • Ender SA, Machner A, Pap G, Hubbe J, Grashoff H, Neumann HW. Cementless CUT femoral neck prosthesis: increased rate of aseptic loosening after 5 years. Acta Orthop 2007; 78(5):616–21.
  • Eskelinen A, Remes V, Helenius I, Pulkkinen P, Nevalainen J, Paavolainen P. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis in younger patients in the Finnish arthroplasty register. 4,661 primary replacements followed for 0-22 years. Acta Orthop 2005; 76(1):28–41
  • Hauptfleisch J, Glyn-Jones S, Beard DJ, Gill HS, Murray DW. The premature failure of the Charnley Elite-Plus stem: a confirmation of RSA predictions. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2006; 88 (2):179–83
  • Havelin LI, Fenstad AM, Salomonsson R, Mehnert F, Furnes O, Overgaard S, The Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association: a unique collaboration between 3 national hip arthroplasty registries with 280,201 THRs. Acta Orthop 2009; 80 (4):393–401
  • Huo MH, Parvizi J, Bal BS, Mont MA, Council of Musculoskeletal Specialty Societies (COMSS) of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. What’s new in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2008; 90 (9):2043–55
  • Ishaque BA, Donle E, Gils J, Wienbeck S, Basad E, Stürz H. Eight-year results of the femoral neck prosthesis ESKA-CUT. Z Orthop Unfall. 2009; 147 (2):158–65
  • Johanson PE, Fenstad AM, Furnes O, Garellick G, Havelin LI, Overgaard S, Inferior outcome after hip resurfacing arthroplasty than after conventional arthroplasty. Evidence from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) database, 1995 to 2007. Acta Orthop 2010; 81 (5):535–41
  • Kaptein BL, Valstar ER, Stoel BC, Rozing PM, Reiber JH. A new model-based RSA method validated using CAD models and models from reversed engineering. J Biomech 2003; 36 (6):873–82.
  • Kärrholm J, Borssen B, Lowenhielm G, Snorrason F. Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter: 4-7 year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1994; 76: 912–7.
  • Koebke J, Xepulias P, Thomas W. Cut type femur neck prosthesis--a functional morphologic analysis. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2000; 45(5):135–40
  • Morrey BF. Short-stemmed uncemented femoral component for primary hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1989; (249):169–75.
  • National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE): Guidance on the selection of prostheses for primary total hip replacement. Available Online at http://guidance.nice.org.uk/TA2/Guidance/pdf/English Accessed online at December 6, 2011
  • Nelissen RG, Pijls BC, Karrholm J, Malchau H, Nieuwenhuiijse MJ, Valstar ER. RSA and registries: The quest for phased introduction of new implants. J. Bone Joint Surg (Am) (Suppl 3 E) 2011; 93: 62–5.
  • Ranstam J, Ryd L, Onsten I. Accurate accuracy assessment: review of basic principles. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71 (1):106–8
  • Rudert M, Leichtle U, Leichtle C, Thomas W. Implantation technique for the CUT-type femoral neck endoprosthesis. Oper Orthop Traumatol 2007; 19 (5-6):458–72
  • Röhrl SM, Li MG, Pedersen E, Ullmark G, Nivbrant B. Migration pattern of a short femoral neck preserving stem. Clin Orthop 2006; (448):73–8.
  • Ryd L, Albrektsson BE, Carlsson L, Dansgård F, Herberts P, Lindstrand A, Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis as a predictor of mechanical loosening of knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1995; 77: 377–83.
  • Simpson JM, Villar RN. Resurfacing registers concern. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2010; 92 (11):1493–7
  • Specht J, Schneider T, Mecklenbeck W, Arnold W. The femoral neck prosthesis Cut 2000 – first clinical, radiological and scintigraphic results. Orthop Prax 2003; 5: 307–11.
  • Springer BD, Connelly SE, Odum SM, Fehring TK, Griffin WL, Mason JB, Masonis JL. Cementless femoral components in young patients: review and meta-analysis of total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty (6 Suppl) 2009; 24: 2–8.
  • Steens W, Skripitz R, Schneeberger AG, Petzing I, Simon U, Goetze C. Cementless femoral neck prosthesis CUT--clinical and radiological results after 5 years. Z Orthop Unfall 2010; 148 (4):413–9
  • Stukenborg-Colsman C. Femoral neck prostheses. Orthopade 2007; 36 (4):347–52
  • Thomas W, Grundei H. The ESKA femoral neck prosthesis for internal fixation cut. Orthop Prax 1999; 35: 646–52.
  • Thomas W, Lucente L, Mantegna N, Grundei H. ESKA (CUT) endoprosthesis. Orthopade 2004; 33 (11):1243–8
  • Valstar ER, Gill R, Ryd L, Flivik G, Börlin N, Kärrholm J. Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants. Acta Orthop 2005; 76 (4):563–72
  • Walker PS, Blunn GW, de Prada D, Casas C. Design rationale and dimensional considerations for a femoral neck prosthesis. Clin Orthop 2005; (441):313–9.
  • Zelle BA, Gerich TG, Bastian L, Shuler FD, Pape HC, Krettek C. Total hip arthroplasty in young patients using the thrust plate prosthesis: clinical and radiological results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2004; 124 (5):310–6