Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Orthopaedica Volume 83, 2012 - Issue 4
Journal homepage
1,848
Views
62
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Hip

Use of porous trabecular metal augments with impaction bone grafting in management of acetabular bone loss

Early to medium-term results

W Steven BorlandDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Freeman Hospital, High Heaton, Newcastle upon Tyne, UKCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Raj BhattacharyaDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Freeman Hospital, High Heaton, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
,
James P HollandDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Freeman Hospital, High Heaton, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
&
Nigel T BrewsterDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Freeman Hospital, High Heaton, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Pages 347-352 | Received 14 Nov 2011, Accepted 21 May 2012, Published online: 20 Aug 2012

  • Berry DJ, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD, Cabanela ME. Pelvic discontinuity in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1999; 81 (12):1692–702.
  • Berry DJ, Sutherland CJ, Trousdale RT, Colwell CW, Jr., Chandler HP, Ayres D, Yashar AA. Bilobed oblong porous coated acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2000; (371): 154-60.
  • Bobyn JD, Pilliar RM, Cameron HU, Weatherly GC. The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous-surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone. Clin Orthop 1980; (150): 263-70.
  • Bozic KJ, Freiberg AA, Harris WH. The high hip center. Clin Orthop 2004; (420): 101-5.
  • Chen WM, Engh CA, Jr., Hopper RH, Jr., McAuley JP, Engh CA. Acetabular revision with use of a bilobed component inserted without cement in patients who have acetabular bone-stock deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2000; 82 (2):197–206.
  • Cohen R. A porous tantalum trabecular metal: basic science. Am J Orthop 2002; 31 (4):216–7.
  • Dearborn JT, Harris WH. Acetabular revision arthroplasty using so-called jumbo cementless components: an average 7-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15 (1):8–15.
  • DeBoer DK, Christie MJ. Reconstruction of the deficient acetabulum with an oblong prosthesis: three- to seven-year results. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13 (6):674–80.
  • Dewal H, Chen F, Su E, Di Cesare PE. Use of structural bone graft with cementless acetabular cups in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18 (1):23–8.
  • Gross AE. Revision arthroplasty of the acetabulum with restoration of bone stock. Clin Orthop 1999; (369): 198-207.
  • Gross AE, Goodman S. The current role of structural grafts and cages in revision arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop 2004; (429): 193-200.
  • Lakstein D, Backstein D, Safir O, Kosashvili Y, Gross AE. Trabecular Metal cups for acetabular defects with 50% or less host bone contact. Clin Orthop 2009; 467(9):2318–24.
  • Lingard EA, Muthumayandi K, Holland JP. Comparison of patient-reported outcomes between hip resurfacing and total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2009; 91 (12):1550–4.
  • Mahomed N, Daltroy L, Fossel A, Katz J. Self-administered satisfaction scale for joint replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) (Suppl 1) 1998; 80:9.
  • Nehme A, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD. Modular porous metal augments for treatment of severe acetabular bone loss during revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2004; (429): 201-8.
  • Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM. Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 1994; 9 (1):33–44.
  • Patel JV, Masonis JL, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH. The fate of cementless jumbo cups in revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18 (2):129–33.
  • Saleh KJ, Jaroszynski G, Woodgate I, Saleh L, Gross AE. Revision total hip arthroplasty with the use of structural acetabular allograft and reconstruction ring: a case series with a 10-year average follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15 (8):951–8.
  • Schmalzried TP, Jasty M, Harris WH. Periprosthetic bone loss in total hip arthroplasty. Polyethylene wear debris and the concept of the effective joint space. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1992; 74 (6):849–63.
  • Schreurs BW, Slooff TJ, Gardeniers JW, Buma P. Acetabular reconstruction with bone impaction grafting and a cemented cup: 20 years’ experience. Clin Orthop 2001; (393): 202-15.
  • Sporer SM, Paprosky WG. The use of a trabecular metal acetabular component and trabecular metal augment for severe acetabular defects. J Arthroplasty (Suppl 2) 2006; 21 (6):83–6.
  • Sporer SM, Paprosky WG. Acetabular revision using a trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with a pelvic discontinuity. J Arthroplasty (Suppl 2) 2006; 21 (6):87–90.
  • Theiler R, Spielberger J, Bischoff HA, Bellamy N, Huber J, Kroesen S. Clinical evaluation of the WOMAC 3.0 OA Index in numeric rating scale format using a computerized touch screen version. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2002; 10 (6):479–81.
  • Unger AS, Lewis RJ, Gruen T. Evaluation of a porous tantalum uncemented acetabular cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: clinical and radiological results of 60 hips. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20 (8):1002–9.
  • van Egmond N, De Kam D, Gardeniers J, Schreurs BW. Revisions of Extensive Acetabular Defects with Impaction Grafting and a Cement Cup. Clin Orthop 2011; 469(2):562–73.
  • van Haaren EH, Heyligers IC, Alexander FG, Wuisman PI. High rate of failure of impaction grafting in large acetabular defects. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2007; 89 (3):296–300.
  • Ware JE, Jr. SF-36 health survey update. Spine 2000; 25 (24):3130–9.
  • Weeden SH, Schmidt RH. The use of tantalum porous metal implants for Paprosky 3A and 3B defects. J Arthroplasty (Suppl 2) 2007; 22 (6):151–5.
  • Whaley AL, Berry DJ, Harmsen WS. Extra-large uncemented hemispherical acetabular components for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2001; 83 (9):1352–7.
  • Wright RJ, Sledge CB, Poss R, Ewald FC, Walsh ME, Lingard EA. Patient-reported outcome and survivorship after Kinemax total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2004; 86 (11):2464–70.
  • Wylde V, Learmonth I, Potter A, Bettinson K, Lingard E. Patient-reported outcomes after fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial using the Kinemax total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2008; 90 (9):1172–9.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.