Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Orthopaedica Volume 85, 2014 - Issue 2
Journal homepage
2,423
Views
49
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Hip and knee

A simple visual analog scale for pain is as responsive as the WOMAC, the SF-36, and the EQ-5D in measuring outcomes of revision hip arthroplasty

A prospective cohort study of 45 patients followed for 2 years

Vasilis ZampelisDepartment of Orthopedics, Hässleholm Hospital, Hässleholm;Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.Correspondence[email protected]
,
Ewald OrnsteinDepartment of Orthopedics, Hässleholm Hospital, Hässleholm
,
Herbert FranzénDepartment of Orthopedics, Aleris, Ängelholm Hospital, Ängelholm
&
Isam AtroshiDepartment of Orthopedics, Hässleholm Hospital, Hässleholm;Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Pages 128-132 | Received 18 Mar 2013, Accepted 07 Dec 2013, Published online: 30 Jan 2014

  • Atroshi I, Ornstein E, Franzén H, Johnsson R, Stefánsdóttir A, Sundberg M. Quality of life after hip revision with impaction bone grafting on a par with that 4 years after primary cemented arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand 2004; 75 (6): 677-83.
  • Bellamy N. The WOMAC Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis Indices: development, validation, globalization and influence on the development of the AUSCAN Hand Osteoarthritis Indices. Clin Exp Rheumatol (Suppl 39) 2005; 23 (5): 148-53.
  • Bellamy N, Wells G, Campbell J. Relationship between severity and clinical importance of symptoms in osteoarthritis. Clin Rheumatol 1991; 10 (2): 138-43.
  • Davis AM, Agnidis Z, Badley E, Kiss A, Waddell JP, Gross AE. Predictors of functional outcome two years following revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2006; 88 (4): 685-91.
  • Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Frost S, Gundle R, McLardy-Smith P, Murray D. Evidence for the validity of a patient-based instrument for assessment of outcome after revision hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2001; 83 (8): 1125-9.
  • Devilly GJ. ClinTools Software for Windows: Version 4.1. 2007. Available from: www.clintools.com.
  • Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 1997; 35 (11): 1095-108.
  • Lubbeke A, Katz JN, Perneger TV, Hoffmeyer P. Primary and revision hip arthroplasty: 5-year outcomes and influence of age and comorbidity. J Rheumatol 2007; 34 (2): 394-400.
  • Nilsdotter AK, Roos EM, Westerlund JP, Roos HP, Lohmander LS. Comparative responsiveness of measures of pain and function after total hip replacement. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 45 (3): 258–62.
  • Norman GR, Wyrwich KW, Patrick DL. The mathematical relationship among different forms of responsiveness coefficients. Qual Life Res 2007; 16 (5): 815-22.
  • Rolfson O. Patient-reported outcome measures and health-economic aspects of total hip arthroplasty: a study of the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg 2010.
  • Rolfson O, Rothwell A, Sedrakyan A, Chenok KE, Bohm E, Bozic KJ, Garellick G. Use of patient-reported outcomes in the context of different levels of data. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) (Suppl 3) 2011; 93: 66-71.
  • Shi HY, Chang JK, Wong CY, Wang JW, Tu YK, Chiu HC, Lee KT. Responsiveness and minimal important differences after revision total hip arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010; 11: 261.
  • Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007, 60 (1): 34-42.
  • Ware J EJr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30 (6): 473-83.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.