2,160
Views
61
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Lower extremity

Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) in forefoot, hindfoot, and ankle disorders

, , , , &
Pages 187-194 | Received 26 Jun 2013, Accepted 14 Nov 2013, Published online: 25 Feb 2014

  • Agel J, Beskin JL, Brage M, Guyton GP, Kadel NJ, Saltzman CL, et al. Reliability of the Foot Function Index: A report of the AOFAS Outcomes Committee. Foot Ankle Int 2005; 26 (11): 962-7.
  • Baumhauer JF, Nawoczenski DA, DiGiovanni BF, Wilding GE. Reliability and validity of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Clinical Rating Scale: a pilot study for the hallux and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 2006; 27 (12): 1014-9.
  • Becker BJ. Synthesizing standardized mean change measures. Br J Math Stat Psychol 1988; 41: 257-78.
  • Bremander AB, Petersson IF, Roos EM. Validation of the Rheumatoid and Arthritis Outcome Score (RAOS) for the lower extremity. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003; 1: 55.
  • Budiman-Mak E, Conrad KJ, Roach KE. The Foot Function Index: a measure of foot pain and disability. J Clin Epidemiol 1991; 44 (6): 561-70.
  • Chen L, Lyman S, Do H, Karlsson J, Adam SP, Young E, et al. Validation of foot and ankle outcome score for hallux valgus. Foot Ankle Int 2012; 33 (12): 1145-55.
  • Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press, New York 1978.
  • Coster M, Karlsson MK, Nilsson JA, Carlsson A. Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of a self-reported foot and ankle score (SEFAS). Acta Orthop 2012; 83 (2): 197-203.
  • Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1996; 78 (2): 185-90.
  • Dawson J, Coffey J, Doll H, Lavis G, Cooke P, Herron M, et al. A patient-based questionnaire to assess outcomes of foot surgery: validation in the context of surgery for hallux valgus. Qual Life Res 2006; 15 (7): 1211-22.
  • Dawson J, Boller I, Doll H, Lavis G, Sharp R, Cooke P, et al. Responsiveness of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) compared with AOFAS, SF-36 and EQ-5D assessments following foot or ankle surgery. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2012; 94 (2): 215-21.
  • de Groot IB, Favejee MM, Reijman M, Verhaar JA, Terwee CB. The Dutch version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score: a validation study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2008; 6: 16.
  • Euroqol Group. EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol Group. Health Policy 1990; 16 (3): 199-208.
  • Goksel Karatepe A, Gunaydin R, Kaya T, Karlibas U, Ozbek G. Validation of the Turkish version of the foot and ankle outcome score. Rheumatol Int 2009; 30 (2): 169-73.
  • Hosman AH, Mason RB, Hobbs T, Rothwell AG. A New Zealand national joint registry review of 202 total ankle replacements followed for up to 6 years. Acta Orthop 2007; 78 (5): 584-91.
  • Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M. Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 1994; 15 (7): 349-53.
  • Lau JT, Mahomed NM, Schon LC. Results of an Internet survey determining the most frequently used ankle scores by AOFAS members. Foot Ankle Int 2005; 26 (6): 479-82.
  • Liang MH. Evaluating measurement responsiveness. J Rheumatol 1995; 22 (6): 1191-2.
  • Mani SB, Brown HC, Nair P, Chen L, Do HT, Lyman S, et al. Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score in adult acquired flatfoot deformity. Foot Ankle Int 2013; 34 (8): 1140-6.
  • Naal FD, Impellizzeri FM, Rippstein PF. Which are the most frequently used outcome instruments in studies on total ankle arthroplasty? Clin Orthop 2010; (468) (3): 815-26.
  • Patel AA, Donegan D, Albert T. The 36-item short form. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007; 15 (2): 126-34.
  • Pena F, Agel J, Coetzee JC. Comparison of the MFA to the AOFAS outcome tool in a population undergoing total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int 2007; 28 (7): 788-93.
  • Richter M, Zech S, Geerling J, Frink M, Knobloch K, Krettek C. A new foot and ankle outcome score: Questionnaire based, subjective, Visual-Analogue-Scale, validated and computerized. Foot Ankle Surg 2006; 12 (4): 191-9.
  • Roos EM, Brandsson S, Karlsson J. Validation of the foot and ankle outcome score for ankle ligament reconstruction. Foot Ankle Int 2001; 22 (10): 788-94.
  • SooHoo NF, Shuler M, Fleming LL. Evaluation of the validity of the AOFAS Clinical Rating Systems by correlation to the SF-36. Foot Ankle Int 2003; 24 (1): 50-5.
  • Streiner D, Norman G. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their developement and use. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.
  • Suk M. Musculoskeletal Outcomes measures and Instruments. AO Foundation; 2009.
  • Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware JE. The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey–I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Soc Sci Med 1995; 41 (10): 1349-58.
  • Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60 (1): 34-42.
  • Wamper KE, Sierevelt IN, Poolman RW, Bhandari M, Haverkamp D. The Harris hip score: Do ceiling effects limit its usefulness in orthopedics? Acta Orthop 2010; 81 (6): 703-7.