Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Orthopaedica Volume 85, 2014 - Issue 6
Journal homepage
1,375
Views
42
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Hip

Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using a modular tapered, fluted titanium stem

5- to 16-year results of 163 cases

Dieter C WirtzDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, BonnCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Sascha GraviusDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn
,
Rudolf AscherlDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zeisigwald Hospital Bethanien, Chemnitz
,
Miguel ThorweiheDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn
,
Raimund ForstDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen/Nürnberg, Erlangen
,
Ulrich NoethDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg
,
Uwe M MausDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Pius-Hospital Oldenburg, Oldenburg
,
Matthias D WimmerDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn
,
Günther ZeilerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rummelsberg Hospital, Schwarzenbruck, Germany.
&
Moritz C DemlDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn
 show all
Pages 562-569 | Received 04 Jan 2014, Accepted 29 May 2014, Published online: 01 Sep 2014

  • Altman DG, Machin D, Bryant TN, Gardner MJ. Statistics with Confidence: Confidence Intervals and Statistical Guidelines, 2nd edition. British Medical Journal, Wiley 2000.
  • Berry DJ. Femoral revision: distal fixation with fluted, tapered grit-blasted stems. J Arthroplast 2002; 17: 142–6.
  • Böhm P, Bischel O. Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem: evaluation of one hundred and twenty-nine revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 years. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2001; 83: 1023–31.
  • Charnley J. The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1972; 54: 61–76.
  • Dohmae Y, Bechthold JE, Sherman RE, Puno RM, Gustilo RB. Reduction in cement-bone interface shear strength between primary and revision arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1988; (36): 214–20.
  • Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE. Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop 1990; (257): 107–28.
  • Engh CA Jr, Ellis TJ, Koralewicz LM, McAuley JP, Engh CA Sr. Extensively porous-coated femoral revision for severe femoral bone loss: minimum 10-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17: 955–960.
  • Fink B, Grossmann A, Schubring S, Schulz MS, Fuerst M. Short-term results of hip revisions with a curved cementless modular stem in association with the surgical approach. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009; 129 (1): 65-73.
  • Franklin J, Malchau H. Risk factors for periprosthetic femoral fracture. Injury 2007; 38 (6): 655–60.
  • Gravius S, Mumme T, Andereya S, Maus U, Müller-Rath R, Wirtz DC. The morse taper junction in modular revision hip replacement. Z Orthop Unfall 2007; 145 (2): 157-60.
  • Gravius S, Randau T, Wirtz DC. What can be done when hip prostheses fail? New trends in revision endoprosthetics. Orthopade 2011; 40 (12): 1084-94.
  • Grunig R, Morscher E, Ochsner PE. Three- to 7-year results with the uncemented SL femoral revision prosthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1997; 116 (4): 187–97.
  • Gutierrez Del Alamo J, Garcia-Cimbrelo E, Castellanos V, Gil-Garay E. Radiographic bone regeneration and clinical outcome with the Wagner SL revision stem: a 5-year to 12-year follow-up study. J Arthroplast 2007; 22: 515–24.
  • Head WC, Emerson R H Jr, Higgins LL. A titanium cementless calcar replacement prosthesis in revision surgery of the femur: 13-year experience. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16: 183–7.
  • Kavanagh BF, Fitzgerald R H Jr. Clinical and roentgenographic assessment of total hip arthroplasty. A new hip score. Clin Orthop 1985; (193): 133–40.
  • Kwong LM, Miller AJ, Lubinus P. A modular distal fixation option for proximal bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: a 2- to 6-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18: 94–7.
  • Lie SA, Havelin LI, Furnes ON, Engesaeter LB, Vollset SE. Failure rates for 4762 revision total hip arthroplasties in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2004; 86 (4): 504–9.
  • Mumme T, Muller-Rath R, Weisskopf M, Andereya S, Neuss M, Wirtz DC. The cement-free modular revision prosthesis MRP-hip revision stem prosthesis in clinical follow-up. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2004; 142: 314–21.
  • Mumme T, Muller-Rath R, Andereya S, Wirtz DC. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem. Oper Orthop Traumatol 2007; 19: 56–77.
  • Pak JH, Paprosky WG, Jablonsky WS, Lawrence JM. Femoral strut allografts in cementless revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1993; (295): 172-8.
  • Paprosky WG, Lawrence J, Cameron H. Femoral defect classification: clinical application. Orthop Rev (Suppl 9) 1990; 19: 9-17.
  • Patel PD, Klika AK, Murray T G Elsharkawy KA, Krebs VE, Barsoum WK. Influence of technique with distally fixed modular stems in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25: 926–31.
  • Rader CP, Eulert J. Verankerungstechniken. In: Modulare Revisionsendoprothetik des Hüftgelenkes ( eds Thümler P, Forst R, Zeiler G (Hrsg)). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 2005.
  • Randhawa K, Hossain FS, Smith B, Mauffrey C, Lawrence T. A prospective study of hip revision surgery using the Exeter long-stem prosthesis: function, subsidence, and complications for 57 patients. J Orthop Traumatol 2009; 10: 159–65.
  • Retpen JB, Varmarken JE, Jensen JS. Survivorship analysis of failure pattern after revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1989; 4: 311–7.
  • Salvati EA, Liebermann JR, Huk OL, Evans BG. Complications of femoral and acetabular modularity. Clin Orthop 1995; (319): 85-93.
  • Schramm M, Wirtz DC, Holzwarth U, Pitto RP. The morse taper junction in modular revision hip replacement—a biomechanical and retrieval analysis. Biomed Technik 2000; 45: 105-9.
  • Stromberg CN, Herberts PA. Cemented revision total hip arthroplasties in patients younger than 55 years old. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11: 489–99.
  • Wagner H, Wagner M. Femur revision prosthesis. Z Orthop 1993; 131 (6): 574-7.
  • Warren PJ, Thompson P, Fletcher MD. Transfemoral implantation of the Wagner SL stem. The abolition of subsidence and enhancement of osteotomy union rate using Dall-Miles cables. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2002; 122: 557–60.
  • Weber KL, Callaghan JJ, Goetz DD, Johnston RC. Revision of a failed cemented total hip prosthesis with insertion of an acetabular component without cement and a femoral component with cement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1996; 78: 982–94.
  • Weeden SH, Paprosky WG. Minimal 11-year follow-up of extensively porous-coated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (Suppl 1) 2002; 17 (4): 134-7.
  • Weiss RJ, Stark A, Kärrholm J. A modular cementless stem vs. cemented long-stem prostheses in revision surgery of the hip: a population-based study from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2011; 82 (2):136-42.
  • Wimmer MD, Randau TM, Deml MC, Ascherl R, Nöth U, Forst R, Gravius N, Wirtz D, Gravius S. Impaction grafting in the femur in cementless modular revision total hip arthroplasty: a descriptive outcome analysis of 243 cases with the MRP-TITAN revision implant. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2013; 14: 19.
  • Wirtz DC, Heller KD, Holzwarth U, Siebert C, Pitto RP, Zeiler G, Blencke BA, Forst R. A modular femoral implant for uncemented stem revision in THR. Int Orthop 2000; 24 (3): 134–8.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.