Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Orthopaedica Volume 85, 2014 - Issue 6
Journal homepage
1,245
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Knee

2- to 9-year outcome of stemmed total knee arthroplasty

Similar failure rates in patients when used primary or as a revision

Rüdiger J WeissDepartment of Orthopaedics, Karolinska University Hospital;Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska InstitutetCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Martin ThorsellDepartment of Orthopaedics, Capio St. Görans Hospital
,
André StarkDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet
,
Josefina NyvangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Karolinska University Hospital;Institution of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
&
Margareta HedströmDepartment of Orthopaedics, Karolinska University Hospital;Institution of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Pages 609-613 | Published online: 19 Sep 2014

  • Agarwal S, Azam A, Morgan-Jones R. Metal metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee replacement. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B (12): 1640-4.
  • Barrack RL, Rorabeck C, Burt M, Sawhney J. Pain at the end of the stem after revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; (367): 216-25.
  • Bottner F, Laskin R, Windsor RE, Haas SB. Hybrid component fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; (446): 127-31.
  • Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 1996; 37 (1): 53-72.
  • Bryant D, Havey TC, Roberts R, Guyatt G. How many patients? How many limbs? Analysis of patients or limbs in the orthopaedic literature: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (1): 41-5.
  • Engh GA, Ammeen DJ. Bone loss with revision total knee arthroplasty: defect classification and alternatives for reconstruction. Instr Course Lect 1999; 48: 167-75.
  • Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; (248): 9-12.
  • Gudnason A, Milbrink J, Hailer NP. Implant survival and outcome after rotating-hinge total knee revision arthroplasty: a minimum 6-year follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2011; 131 (11): 1601-7.
  • Haas SB, Insall JN, Montgomery W, 3rd, Windsor RE. Revision total knee arthroplasty with use of modular components with stems inserted without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995; 77 (11): 1700-7.
  • Hossain F, Patel S, Haddad FS. Midterm assessment of causes and results of revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468 (5): 1221-8.
  • Kim YH, Kim JS. Revision total knee arthroplasty with use of a constrained condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (6): 1440-7.
  • Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030 .J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (4): 780-5.
  • Lie SA, Engesaeter LB, Havelin LI, Gjessing HK, Vollset SE. Dependency issues in survival analyses of 55,782 primary hip replacements from 47,355 patients. Stat Med 2004; 23 (20): 3227-40.
  • Mortazavi SM, Molligan J, Austin MS, Purtill JJ, Hozack WJ, Parvizi J. Failure following revision total knee arthroplasty: infection is the major cause. Int Orthop 2011; 35 (8): 1157-64.
  • Parsley BS, Sugano N, Bertolusso R, Conditt MA. Mechanical alignment of tibial stems in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18 (7 Suppl 1): 33-6.
  • Peters CL, Erickson JA, Gililland JM. Clinical and radiographic results of 184 consecutive revision total knee arthroplasties placed with modular cementless stems. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24 (6 Suppl): 48-53.
  • Petrou G, Petrou H, Tilkeridis C, Stavrakis T, Kapetsis T, Kremmidas N, et al. Medium-term results with a primary cemented rotating-hinge total knee replacement. A 7- to 15-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86 (6): 813-7.
  • Roos EM, Lohmander LS. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003; 1: 64.
  • Schroer WC, Berend KR, Lombardi AV, Barnes CL, Bolognesi MP, Berend ME, et al. Why are total knees failing today? Etiology of total knee revision in 2010 and 2011 .J Arthroplasty 2013; 28 (8 Suppl): 116-9.
  • Sheng P, Lehto M, Kataja M, Halonen P, Moilanen T, Pajamaki J. Patient outcome following revision total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop 2004; 28 (2): 78-81.
  • Sheng PY, Jamsen E, Lehto MU, Konttinen YT, Pajamaki J, Halonen P. Revision total knee arthroplasty with the Total Condylar III system in inflammatory arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87 (9): 1222-4.
  • Sheng PY, Jamsen E, Lehto M, Pajamaki J, Halonen P, Konttinen YT. Revision total knee arthroplasty with the total condylar III system: a comparative analysis of 71 consecutive cases of osteoarthritis or inflammatory arthritis. Acta Orthop 2006a; 77 (3): 512-8.
  • Sheng PY, Konttinen L, Lehto M, Ogino D, Jamsen E, Nevalainen J, et al. Revision total knee arthroplasty: 1990 through 2002. A review of the Finnish arthroplasty registry. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006b; 88 (7): 1425-30.
  • SKAR. Annual Report 2012, Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register, http://www.knee.nko.se/.
  • Suarez J, Griffin W, Springer B, Fehring T, Mason JB, Odum S. Why do revision knee arthroplasties fail? J Arthroplasty 2008; 23 (6 Suppl 1): 99-103.
  • Takahashi Y, Gustilo RB. Nonconstrained implants in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; (309): 156-62.
  • Whiteside LA. Cementless fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; (446): 140-8.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.