Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Orthopaedica Volume 85, 2014 - Issue 6
Journal homepage
1,319
Views
37
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Hip

Cross-sectional imaging of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties

Can we substitute MARS MRI with CT?

Elizabeth Robinson Institute of Musculoskeletal Science, UCL, LondonCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Johann Henckel Institute of Musculoskeletal Science, UCL, London
,
Shiraz Sabah Institute of Musculoskeletal Science, UCL, London
,
Keshthra SatchithanandaDepartment of Imaging, King’s College Hospitals, London
,
John Skinner Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Brockley Hill, Stanmore, UK.
&
Alister Hart Institute of Musculoskeletal Science, UCL, London
Pages 577-584 | Published online: 30 Sep 2014

  • Anderson H, Toms AP, Cahir JG, Goodwin RW, Wimhurst J. Nolan JF. Grading the severity of soft tissue changes associated with metal-on-metal hip replacements: reliability of an MR grading system. Skeletal Radiol 2011; 40: 303-7.
  • Bal BS, Lowe JA. Muscle damage in minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: MRI evidence that it is not significant. Instr Course Lect 2008; 57: 223-9.
  • Bosker BH, Ettema HB, Boomsma MF, Kollen BJ, Maas M, Verheyen CC. High incidence of pseudotumour formation after large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip replacement: a prospective cohort study. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2012; 94, 755-61.
  • Cahir JG, Toms AP, Marshall TJ, Wimhurst J, Nolan J. CT and MRI of hip arthroplasty. Clin Radiol 2007; 62: 1163-71; discussion 1172-3.
  • Carr AM, Desteiger, R. Osteolysis in patients with a metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. ANZ J Surg 2008; 78: 144-7.
  • Chang EY, Mcanally JL, Van Horne JR, Statum S, Wolfson T, Gamst A, Chung CB. Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: do symptoms correlate with MR imaging findings? Radiology 2012; 265: 848-57.
  • Davies AP, Willert HG, Campbell PA, Learmonth ID, Case CP. An unusual lymphocytic perivascular infiltration in tissues around contemporary metal-on-metal joint replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87: 18-27.
  • Grammatopolous G, Pandit H, Kwon YM, Gundle R, Mclardy-Smith P, Beard DJ, Murray DW, Gill HS. Hip resurfacings revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcome. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2009; 91: 1019-24.
  • Hannemann F, Hartmann A, Schmitt J, et al. European multidisciplinary consensus statement on the use and monitoring of metal-on-metal bearings for total hip replacement and hip resurfacing. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2013; 99: 263-71.
  • Hart AJ, Sabah S, Henckel J, Lewis A, Cobb J, Sampson B, Mitchell A, Skinner JA. The painful metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2009; 91: 738-44.
  • Hart AJ, Satchithananda K, Liddle AD, Sabah SA, Mcrobbie D, Henckel J, Cobb JP, Skinner JA, Mitchell AW. Pseudotumors in association with well-functioning metal-on-metal hip prostheses: a case-control study using three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94: 317-25.
  • Hauptfleisch J, Pandit H, Grammatopoulos G, Gill HS, Murray DW, Ostlere S. A MRI classification of periprosthetic soft tissue masses (pseudotumours) associated with metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasty. Skeletal Radiol 2012; 41: 149-55.
  • Hayter CL, Potter HG, Su EP. Imaging of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. Orthop Clin North Am 2011a; 42: 195-205.
  • Hayter CL, Koff MF, Shah P, Koch KM, Miller TT, Potter, HG. MRI after arthroplasty: comparison of MAVRIC and conventional fast spin-echo techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011b; 197: W405-11.
  • Hayter CL, Gold SL, Koff MF, Perino G, Nawabi DH, Miller TT, Potter HG. MRI findings in painful metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012a; 199: 884-93.
  • Hayter CL, Koff MF, Potter HG. Magnetic resonance imaging of the postoperative hip. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012b; 35: 1013-25.
  • Henckel J, Richards R, Lozhkin K, Harris S, Rodriguez Y, Baena FM, Barrett AR, Cobb JP. Very low-dose computed tomography for planning and outcome measurement in knee replacement. The imperial knee protocol. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2006; 88: 1513-8.
  • Korovessis P, Petsinis G, Repanti M, Repantis T. Metallosis after contemporary metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Five to nine-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88: 1183-91.
  • Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159-74.
  • McMinn D. McMinn Centre: MHRA Advice for Patients. [Online] [Cited 2014 April 01]. Available from: http://www.mcminncentre.co.uk/mhra-advice-patients.html.
  • MHRA (Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency). Medical Device Alert: All metal-on-metal (MoM) hip replacements (MDA/2012/036). [Online] 2012 [Cited 2014 April 01]. Available from: http://www.mhra.gov.uk/home/groups/dts-bs/documents/medicaldevicealert/con155767.pdf.
  • Milosev I, Trebse R, Kovac S, Cor A, Pisot V. Survivorship and retrieval analysis of Sikomet metal-on-metal total hip replacements at a mean of seven years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88: 1173-82.
  • Munro JT, Masri BA, Duncan CP, Garbuz DS. High complication rate after revision of large-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472: 523-8.
  • Nawabi DH, Gold S, Lyman S, Fields K, Padgett DE, Potter HG. MRI predicts ALVAL and tissue damage in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 472: 471-81.
  • Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S, Mclardy-Smith P, Gundle R, Whitwell D, Gibbons CL, Ostlere S, Athanasou N, Gill HS, Murray DW. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2008; 90, 847-51.
  • Park JS, Ryu KN, Hong HP, Park YK, Chun YS, Yoo MC. Focal osteolysis in total hip replacement: CT findings. Skeletal Radiol 2004; 33: 632-40.
  • Park YS, Moon YW, Lim SJ, Yang JM, Ahn G, Choi YL. Early osteolysis following second-generation metal-on-metal hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87: 1515-21.
  • Puri L, Wixson RL, Stern SH, Kohli J, Hendrix RW, Stulberg SD. Use of helical computed tomography for the assessment of acetabular osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84-A: 609-14.
  • Roth TD, Maertz NA, Parr JA, Buckwalter KA, Choplin RH. CT of the hip prosthesis: appearance of components, fixation, and complications. Radiographics 2012; 32: 1089-107.
  • Sabah SA, Mitchell AW, Henckel J, Sandison A, Skinner JA, Hart AJ. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in painful metal-on-metal hips: a prospective study. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26 (1): 71-6.
  • MHRA (Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency) Report of the Expert Advisory Group looking at soft tissue reactions associated with metal-on-metal hip replacements. [Online]. 2012 [Cited 2014 April 01]. Available from: http://www.mhra.gov.uk/home/groups/dts-bi/documents/websiteresources/con097079.pdf.
  • Thomas MS, Wimhurst JA, Nolan JF, Toms AP. Imaging metal-on-metal hip replacements: the Norwich experience. HSS J 2013; 9: 247-256.
  • Toms AP, Marshall TJ, Cahir J, Darrah C, Nolan J, Donell ST, Barker T, Tucker JK. MRI of early symptomatic metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective review of radiological findings in 20 hips. Clin Radiol 2008; 63: 49-58.
  • Walde TA, Weiland DE, Leung SB, Kitamura N, Sychterz CJ, Engh C A, Jr, Claus AM, Potter HG, Engh C A Sr. Comparison of CT, MRI, and radiographs in assessing pelvic osteolysis: a cadaveric study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; (437): 138-44.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.