625
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Correspondence

Cross sectional imaging of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties

, , , &

  • Bosker BH, Ettema HB, Boomsma MF, Kollen BJ, Maas M, Verheyen CC. High incidence of pseudotumour formation after large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip replacement: a prospective cohort study. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2012; 94 (6): 755–61.
  • Hayter CL, Koff MF, Shah P, Koch KM, Miller TT, Potter HG. MRI after arthroplasty: comparison of MAVRIC and conventional fast spin-echo techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197: W405-11.
  • Nam D, Barrack RL, Potter HG. What are the advantages and disadvantages of imaging modalities to diagnose wear-related corrosion problems?. Clin Orthop 2014. [ahead of print]
  • National Joint Registry: 11th annual report 2014 [Online] [Cited 14 January 2015] Available from: http://www.njrreports.org.uk/Portals/0/PDFdownloads/NJR%2011th%20Annual%20Report%202014.pdf
  • Robinson E, Henckel J, Sabah S, Satchithananda K, Skinner J, and Hart A. Cross-sectional imaging of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: can we substitute MARS MRI with CT? Acta Orthop 2014; 85(6): 557-584
  • Siddiqui IA, Sabah SA, Satchithananda K, Lim AK, Cro S, Henckel J, Skinner JA, Hart AJ. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of MARS MRI and ultrasound of the painful metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2014; 85(4): 375-82.
  • Sutter R, Ulbrich EJ, Jellus V, Nittka M, Pfirrmann CW. Reduction of metal artifacts in patients with total hip arthroplasty with slice-encoding metal artifact correction and view-angle tilting MR imaging. Radiology 2012; 265: 204–14.