Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Orthopaedica Volume 86, 2015 - Issue 6
Journal homepage
1,290
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Better survival of hybrid total knee arthroplasty compared to cemented arthroplasty

A report from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1999–2012

Gunnar PeturssonLovisenberg Diakonale Hospital, Oslo;The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, BergenCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Anne Marie FenstadThe Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, BergenCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Leif Ivar HavelinThe Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen;Department of Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, BergenCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Øystein GøthesenThe Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen;Department of Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen;Haugesund Hospital, HaugesundCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Stein Håkon Låstad LygreDepartment of Occupational Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, BergenCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Stephan M RöhrlOslo University Hospital, Ullevål, Department of Orthopaedics, Oslo, NorwayCorrespondence[email protected]
&
Ove FurnesThe Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen;Department of Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, BergenCorrespondence[email protected]
 show all
Pages 714-720 | Received 28 Jul 2014, Accepted 27 Mar 2015, Published online: 16 Jul 2015

  • Abu-Rajab RB, Watson WS, Walker B, Roberts J, Gallacher SJ, Meek RM. Periprosthetic bone mineral density after total knee arthroplasty. Cemented versus cementless fixation. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2006; 88: 606–13.
  • Arthursson AJ, Furnes O, Espehaug B, Havelin LI, Søreide JA. Validation of data in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register the Norwegian Patient Register: 5,134 primary total hip arthroplasties and revisions operated at a single hospital between 1987 and 2003. Acta Orthop 2005; 76(6): 823–8.
  • Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report. Adelaide:AOA; 2012.
  • Badawy M, Espehaug B, Indrekvam K, Engesæter LB, Havelin LI, Furnes O. Influence of Hospital Volume on Revision Rate After Total Knee Arthroplasty with Cement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2013; 95: e131 (1-6)
  • Bassett RW. Results of 1,000 Performance knees: cementless versus cemented fixation. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13: 409–13.
  • Beauprè LA, al-Yamani M, Huckell JR, Johnston DWC. Hydoxyapitite-coated tibial implants compared with cemented tibial fixation in primary total knee arthroplasty. A randomized trial of outcomes at five years. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2007; 89: 2204–11.
  • Bellemans J, Ries MD, Victor J. Total knee arthroplasty. A guide to get better performance. Springer Science & Business Media. 2005.
  • Campbell MD, Duffy GP, Trousdale RT. Femoral component failure in hyprid total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; 356: 58–65.
  • Carlsson A, Bjorkman A, Besjakov J, Onsten I. Cemented tibial component fixation performs better than cenentless fixation: a randomized radiostereometric study comparing porous-coated, hydroxyapatite-coated and cemented tibial components over 5 years. Acta Orthop 2005; 76: 362–9.
  • Carr AJ, Robertsson O, Graves S, Price AJ, Arden NK, Judge A, Beard DJ. Knee replacement. Lancet 2012; 379: 1331–40.
  • Cawley DT, Kelly N, McGarry JP, Shannon FJ. Cementing techniques for the tibial component in primary total knee replacement. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B(3): 295–300.
  • DKAR (Danish Knee Arthroplasty Register). Annual report 2012. Århus Denmark (www.dkar.dk).
  • Duffy GP, Berry DJ, Rand JA. Cement versus cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; (356): 66–72.
  • Espehaug B, Furnes O, Havelin L, Engesæter LB, Vollset S, Kindseth O. Registration completeness in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2006; 77(1): 49–56.
  • Faris PM, Keating EM, Farris A, Meding JB, Ritter MA. Hybrid total knee arthroplasty: 13-year survivorship of AGC total knee systems with average 7 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466: 1204–9.
  • Furnes O, Espehaug B, Lie SA, Vollset SE, Engesæter LB, Havelin LI. Early failures among 7.174 primary total knee replacements. A follow-up study from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1994-2000. Acta Orthop Scand 2002; 73(2): 117–129.
  • Furnes O, Espehaug B, Lie SA, Vollset SE, Engesæter LB, Havelin LI. Failure Mechanisms After Unicompartmental and Tricompartmental Primary Knee Replacement with Cement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2007; 89(3): 519–525.
  • Gao F, Henricson A, Nilsson KG. Cemented versus uncemented fixation of the femoral component of the NexGen CR total knee replacement in patients younger than 60 years: a prospective randomised controlled RSA study. Knee 2009; 16 (3): 200–6.
  • Grambsch PM, Therneau TM. Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika 1994; 81(3): 515–526.
  • Havelin LI, Espehaug B, Vollset SE, Engesæter LB, Langeland N. The Norwegian arthroplasty register. A survey of 17, 444 hip replacements 1987-1990. Acta Orthop Scand 1993; 64: 245–51.
  • Havelin LI, Engesæter LB, Espehaug B, Furnes O, Lie SA, Vollset SE. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplastiew. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71: 337–53.
  • Jonsson EÖ, Johannesdottir H, Robertsson O, Mogensen B. Bacterial contamination of the wound during primary total hip and knee replacement. Acta Orthop 2014; 85(2): 159–164.
  • Knutson K, Lindstrand A, Lidgren L. Survival of knee arthroplastiew. A nation-wide multicentre investigation of 8000 cases. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1986; 68: 795–803.
  • Knutson K, Lewold S, Robertsson O, Lidgren L. The Swedish knee arthroplasty register. A nation-wide study of 30.003 knees 1976-1992. Acta Orthop Scand 1994; 65: 375–86.
  • Nakama GY, Peccin MS, Almeida G JM, Lira N O DA, Queiroz A AB, Navarro RD. Cemented, cementless or hybrid fixation options in total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis and other non-traumatic diseases. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012; Issue 10.
  • New Zealand Orthopaedic Association The New Zealand Joint Registry. Fifteen year report January 1999 to December 2013. www.nzoa.org.nz/nz-joint-registry; 2014.
  • NJR (National Joint Registry for England and Wales). 10th Annual Report 2013 (www.njrcentre.org.uk).
  • Nelissen RG, Valstar ER, Rozing PM. The effect of hydoxyapatite on the micromotion of total knee prostheses. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1998; 80: 1665–72.
  • Nilsson KG, Karrholm J, Carlsson L, Dalen T. Hydroxyapatite coating versus cemented fixation of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty: prospective randomized comparison of hydroxyapatite-coated and cemented tibial components with 5-year follow-up using radiostereometry. J Arthroplasty 1999; 14: 9–20.
  • Paxton EW, Inacio M, Slipchenko T, Fithian DC. The Kaiser Permanente National Total Joint Replacement Registry. Perm J 2008; 12(3): 12–16.
  • Rand JA, Ilstrup DM. Survivorship analysis of total knee arthroplasty. Cumulative rates of survival of 9200 total knee arthroplastiew. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1991; 73 (3): 397–409.
  • Ranstam J, Kärrholm J, Pulkkinen P, Mäkelä K, Espehaug B, Pedersen AB, Mehnert F, Furnes O. Statistical analysis of arthroplasty data II. Guidelines. 2011; 82 (3): 258–267.
  • Regner L, Carlsson L, Karrholm J, Herberts P. Ceramic coating improves tibial component fixation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13: 882–9.
  • Regner L, Carlsson L, Karrholm J, Herberts P. Tibial component fixation in porous- and hydroxyapatite-coated total knee arthroplasty: a radiostereo metric evaluation of migration and inducible displacement after 5 years. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15: 681–9.
  • Robertsson O. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. Validity and Outcome. Thesis, University of Lund 2000.
  • Robertsson O, Ranstam J. No bias of ignored bilaterality when analysing the revision risk of knee prostheses: analysis of a population based sample of 44,590 patients with 55,298 knee prostheses from the national Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2003; 4: 1.
  • Sibanda N, Copley LP, Lewsey JD, Borroff M, Gregg P, MacGregor AJ, Pickford M, Porter M, Tucker K, van der Meulen JH. Revision Rates after Primary Hip Knee Replacements in England between 2003 and 2006. PLoS medicine 2008; 5 (9): 1398–1408.
  • SKAR (Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register). Annual report 2012. Lund, Sweden (www.knee.se).

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.